Anterior segment changes during accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens: High-frequency ultrasound study

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 949-956

  Marchini, Giorgio ^a   Pedrotti, Emilio ^a   Modesti, Marina ^a   Visentin, Silvia ^a   Tosi, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; AGED; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER ANGLE; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMICROSCOPY; CILIARY BODY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IRIS; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBICULUM;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRESBYOPIA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSEUDOPHAKIA;

EID: 43849096257     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kaufman P.L. Accommodation and presbyopia: neuromuscular and biophysical aspects. In: Hart Jr. W.M. (Ed). Adler's Physiology of the Eye; Clinical Application. 9th ed (1992), Mosby, St Louis, MO 391-441
2. Fischer R.F. The mechanics of accommodation in relation to presbyopia. Eye 2 (1988) 646-649
3. Gilmartin B. The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15 (1995) 431-437
4. Croft M.A., and Kaufman P.L. Accommodation and presbyopia: the ciliary neuromuscular view. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 19 1 (2006) 13-24
5. Allen E.D., Burton R.L., Webber S.K., Haaskjold E., Sandvig K., Jyrkkio H., Leite E., Nyström A., and Wollensak J. Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 446-451
6. Gray P.J., and Lyall M.G. Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implants for unilateral cataracts in prepresbyopic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 76 (1992) 336-337
7. Knorz M.C., and Seiberth V. DieTrue-Vista-Bifokal-IOL; Aktuelle Ergebnisse der eupopäischen multizentrischen Studie. [True vista bifocal IOL: update of the European multicenter study]. Ophthalmologe 93 (1996) 17-21
8. Steinert R.F., Aker B.L., Trentacost D.J., Smith P.J., and Tarantino N. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 1243-1255
9. Huber C. Myopic astigmatism; a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Doc Ophthalmol 52 (1981) 123-178
10. Verzella F., and Calossi A. Multifocal effect of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 9 (1993) 58-61
11. Nakazawa M., and Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 96 (1983) 435-438
12. Elder M.J., Murphy C., and Sanderson G.F. Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 615-619
13. Bettman J.W. Apparent accommodation in aphakic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 33 (1950) 921-928
14. Hirsch M.J. Apparent accommodation in aphakia. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 27 (1950) 412-414
15. Bellucci R., and Giardini P. Pseudoaccomodation with the 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: a refraction study of 52 subjects. J Cataract Refract Surg 19 (1993) 32-35
16. Percival S.P.B., and Setty S.S. Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccomodation of the AMO ARRAY multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 19 (1993) 26-31
17. Gimbel H.V., Sanders D.R., and Raanan M.G. Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 881-887 discussion by JT Holladay, 888
18. Cumming J.S., Slade S.G., and Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens; results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 2005-2009 discussion by TP Werblin, 2010
19. Hara T., Hara T., Yasuda A., and Yamada Y. Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action. Part 1. Design and placement in an excised animal eye. Ophthalmic Surg 21 (1990) 128-133
20. Legeais J.-M., Werner L., Werner L., Abenhaim A., and Renard G. Pseudoaccomodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 262-267
21. Nakazawa M., and Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25 (1984) 1458-1460. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/25/12/1458.pdf Accessed March 6, 2008
22. Ishikawa H., and Schuman J.S. Anterior segment imaging: ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17 1 (2004) 7-20
23. Ishikawa H., Liebmann J.M., and Ritch R. Quantitative assessment of the anterior segment using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11 (2000) 133-139
24. Findl O., Kiss B., Petternel V., Menapace R., Georgopoulos M., Rainer G., and Drexler W. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 669-676
25. Ravalico G., and Baccara F. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 68 (1990) 604-646
26. Hardman Lea S.J., Rubinstein M.P., Snead M.P., and Haworth S.M. Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br J Ophthalmol 74 (1990) 22-25
27. Strenk S.A., Strenk L.M., and Guo S. Magnetic resonance imaging of aging, accommodating, phakic, and pseudophakic ciliary muscle diameters. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1792-1798
28. Lesiewska-Junk H., and Kałunżny J. Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eyes of young patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 562-565
29. Nawa Y., Ueda T., Nakatsuka M., Tsuji H., Marutani H., Hara Y., and Uozato H. Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 2069-2072
30. Marchini G., Pedrotti E., Sartori P., and Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses; pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2476-2482
31. Tello C., Liebmann J., Potash S.D., Cohen H., and Ritch R. Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35 (1994) 3549-3552. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/35/9/3549 Accessed March 6, 2008
32. Blum M., Tetz M.R., Faller U., and Völker H.E. Age-related changes of the ciliary sulcus: implications for implanting sulcus-fixated lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 23 (1997) 91-96
33. Davis R.M., Campbell D.M., and Jacoby B.G. Ciliary sulcus anatomical dimensions. Cornea 10 (1991) 244-248
34. Orgül S.I., Daicker B., and Büchi E.R. The diameter of the ciliary sulcus: a morphometric study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231 (1993) 487-490