Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students

Computers and Education

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 609-623

  Padilla Meléndez, Antonio ^a   Garrido Moreno, Aurora ^a   Del Aguila Obra, Ana Rosa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Applications in subject areas; Computer mediated communication; Cooperative collaborative learning; Country specific developments; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; TEACHING; USER INTERFACES;

APPLICATIONS IN SUBJECT AREAS; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COUNTRY-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENTS; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGIES;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 43849088174     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. a encuesta AIMC a usuarios de Internet. Madrid: Sersa. http://www.aimc.es.
2. Barro, S. (2004). Las TIC en el sistema universitario español. Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas (CRUE).
3. Braak J. Domains and determinants of university students' self-perceived computer competence. Computers & Education 43 (2004) 299-312
4. Brown S.A., Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M.M., and Burkman J.R. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information System 11 4 (2002) 283-295
5. Cobarsí, J., Puig-Pey, A., Valls, J., & Coenders, G. (2005). Campus networked information systems in Spain: A student-centred countrywide ranking and cluster classification [online working paper]. UOC (Working Paper Series; WP05-001).
6. Dasgupta S., Granger M., and McGarry N. User acceptance of e-collaboration technology: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Group Decision and Negotiation 11 2 (2002) 87-100
7. Drennan J., Kennedy J., and Pisarski A. Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research 98 6 (2005) 331-339
8. European Commission (2005). Elearning conference conclusions. Brussels: European Commission. http://www.elearningconference.org.
9. Fung H., and Yuen A. Student adoption towards Web-based learning platform. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3583 (2005) 14-25
10. Gaston J. Reaching and teaching the digital natives. Library Hi Tech News 23 3 (2006) 12-13
11. Gong M., Xu Y., and Yu Y. An enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education 15 4 (2004) 365-374
12. Hu P., Clark T.H., and Ma W.W. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management 41 (2003) 227-241
13. Ives B., and Jarvenpaa S.L. Will the Internet revolutionize business education and research?. Sloan Management Review 37 3 (1996) 33-41
14. Kaynama S.A., and Keesling G. Development of a Web-based Internet marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education 22 2 (2000) 84-89
15. Kock N. What is e-collaboration?. International Journal of e-Collaboration 1 1 (2005) 1-7
16. Kock N., and D'Arcy J. Resolving the e-collaboration paradox: The competing influences of media naturalness and compensatory adaptation. [Special issue on electronic collaboration]. Information Management and Consulting 17 4 (2002) 72-78
17. Kock N., and Nosek J. Expanding the boundaries of e-collaboration. [Special issue on expanding the boundaries of e-collaboration]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 48 1 (2005) 1-9
18. Lee M.K.O., Cheung C.M.K., and Cheng Z. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management 42 (2005) 1095-1104
19. Ma O., and Liu L. The Technology Acceptance Model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16 1 (2004) 59-72
20. Martins L.L., and Kellermanns F.W. A model of business school students' acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3 1 (2004) 7-26
21. Oblinger D.G., and Hawking B.L. The myth about student competency. Educause Review 41 2 (2006) 12-13
22. Ong C., and Lai J. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2006) 816-829
23. Papastergiou M., and Solomonidou C. Gender issues in Internet access and favourite Internet activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school. Computers & Education 44 (2005) 377-393
24. Qureshi, S. (2006). Adaptation in distributed projects: Collaborative processes in digital natives and digital immigrants. In Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS '06 (vol. 8, pp. 4-7).
25. Sánchez-Franco M.J. Exploring the influences of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behavior & Information Technology 25 (2006) 19-36
26. Sanchez-Franco, M. J., Villarejo-Ramos, A. F., & Rondan-Cataluña, F. J. (2006). Male and female professors. A theoretical analysis regarding the web acceptance and use. In Proceedings of the fifth European marketing trends congress, Venice (pp. 1-10).
27. Selim H.M. An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education 40 (2003) 343-360
28. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science 42 1 (1996) 85-92
29. Taylor S., and Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 6 (1995) 144-174
30. Telefónica. La sociedad de la información en España 2004 (2004), Telefónica, Spain
31. Thompson S.H.T., and Lim V.K.G. Factors influencing personal computer usage: The gender gap. Women in Management Review 11 8 (1996) 18
32. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 342-365
33. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
34. Venkatesh V., Speier C., and Morris M.G. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences 33 2 (2002) 297-316