A new perturbation solution to the michaelis-menten problem

AIChE Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1344-1357

  Dingee, John W ^a   Anton, A Brad ^a  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioengineering; Mathematical modeling; Reaction kinetics

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REACTION KINETICS;

MICHAELIS-MENTEN (MM); SINGULAR PERTURBATION; SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATION;

PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; REACTION KINETICS;

EID: 43749083008     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11461     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. 1 Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4th ed. New York, NY: Worth Publishing, 2000.
2. 2 Shuler ML, Kargi F. Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
3. 3 Garrett RH, Grisham CM. Biochemistry, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2005.
4. 4 Michaelis L, Menten ML. Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochem Z. 1913 ; 49: 333–369.
5. 5 Wolkenhauer O, Mesarovic M. Feedback dynamics and cell function: why systems biology is called systems biology. Mol BioSystems. 2005 ; 1: 14–16.
6. 6 Hatzimanikatis V, Li CH, Ionita JA, Henry CS, Jankowski MD, Broadbelt LJ. Exploring the diversity of complex metabolic networks. Bioinformatics. 2005 ; 21: 1603–1609.
7. 7 Van Slyke D, Cullen GE. The mode of action of urease and enzymes in general. J Biol Chem. 1914 ; 19: 141–180.
8. 8 Lin CC, Segel LA. Mathematics Applied to Deterministic Problems in the Physical Sciences. New York: SIAM, 1988 ; Chapters 9 and 10.
9. 9 Bender CM, Orszag SA. Advanced Mathemetical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 1974 ; Chapters 7–9.
10. 10 Holmes MH. Introduction to Perturbation Methods. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1995 ; Chapters 1 and 2.
11. 11 O(x)=“order of x ” in an asymptotic sense. Ibid 10, chapter 1.3.
12. 12 Ibid. 8, chapter 9.1; ibid 9, chapter 3.4.
13. 13 Bodenstein M. Z Phyzik Chem. 1913 ; 85: 329.
14. 14 Bowen J, Acrivos A, Oppenheim A. Singular perturbation refinement to quasi‐steady state approximation in chemical kinetics. Chem Eng Sci. 1963 ; 18: 177–188.
15. 15 Briggs GE, Haldane JBS. A note on the kinetics of enzyme action. Biochem J. 1925 ; 19: 338–339.
16. 16 Tzafriri AR. Michaelis‐Menten kinetics at high enzyme concentrations. Bull Math Biol. 2003 ; 65: 1111–1129.
17. 17 Tzafriri AR, Edelman ER. Quasi‐steady‐state kinetics at enzyme and substrate concentrations in excess of the Michaelis‐Menten constant. J Theor Biol. 2007 ; 245: 737–748.
18. 18 Moore JW, Pearson RG. Kinetics and Mechanism, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981 ; Chapter 8.
19. 19 Laidler KJ. Chemical Kinetics, 3rd ed. New York: Prentice‐Hall, 1987 ; Chapter 8.
20. 20 Segel LA. On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics. Bull Math Biol. 1988 ; 50: 579–593.
21. 21 Laidler KJ. Theory of the transient phase in kinetics, with special reference to enzyme systems. Can J Chem. 1955 ; 33: 1614–1624.
22. 22 Seshadri MS, Fritzsch G. Analytical solutions of a simple enzyme kinetic problem by a perturbative procedure. Biophys Struct Mech. 1980 ; 6: 111–123.
23. 23 Segel LA, Slemrod M. The quasi‐steady‐state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev. 1989 ; 31: 446–477.
24. 24 Heineken FG, Tsuchiya HM, Aris R. On the mathematical status of the pseudo‐steady state hypothesis of biochemical kinetics. Math Biosci. 1967 ; 1: 95–113.
25. 25 Rubinow SI. Introduction to Mathematical Biology. New York: Wiley, 1975.
26. 26 Murray JD. Mathematical Biology: An Introduction, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
27. 27 Borghans JAM, de Boer RJ, Segel LA. Extending the quasi‐steady state approximation by changing variables. Bull Math Biol. 1996 ; 58: 43–63.
28. 28 Schnell S, Maini PK. Enzyme kinetics at high enzyme concentrations. Bull Math Biol. 2000 ; 62: 483–499.
29. 29 Ashino R, Nagase M, Vaillancourt R. Behind and beyond the MATLAB ODE suite. Comput Math Appl. 2000 ; 40: 491–512.
30. 30 Shampine LF, Reichelt MW. The MATLAB ODE suite. SIAM J Sci Comput. 1997 ; 18: 1–22.
31. 31 Schnell S, Mendoza C. The condition for pseudo‐first‐order kinetics in enzymatic reactions is independent of the initial enzyme concentration. Biophys J. 2004 ; 107: 165–174.