Michaelis-Menten Kinetics at High Enzyme Concentrations

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1111-1129

  Tzafriri, A R ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344395658     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8240(03)00059-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Atkinson, D. E. (1977). Cellular Energy Metabolism and its Regulation, New York: Academic Press.
2. Borghans, J. A. M., R. J. De Boer and L. A. Segel (1996). Extending the quasi-steady state approximation by changing variables. Bull. Math. Biol. 58, 43-63.
3. Briggs, G. E. and J. B. S. Haldane (1925). A note on the kinetics of enzyme action. Biochem. J. 19, 338-339.
4. Corless, R. M., G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey and D. E. Knuth (1996). On the Lambert W function. Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329-359.
5. Gutfreund, H. and B. R. Hammond (1959). Steps in the reaction of chymotrypsin with tyrosine derivatives. Biochem. J. 73, 526-530.
6. Kruskal, M. D. (1963). Asymptotology, in Mathematical Models in Physical Science, S. Drobot (Ed.), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, pp. 17-48.
7. Li, G., A. S. Tomlin, H. Rabitz and J. Toth (1993). Determination of approximate lumping schemes by a singular perturbation method. J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3562-3574.
8. Lim, H. C. (1973). On kinetic behavior at high enzyme concentrations. AIChE J. 19, 659-661.
9. Lin, C. C. and L. A. Segel (1988). Mathematics Applied to Deterministic Problems in the Natural Sciences, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), pp. 303-320.
10. Michaelis, L. and M. L. Menten (1913). Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochem. Z. 49, 333-369.
11. Schnell, S. and P. K. Maini (2000). Enzyme kinetics at high enzyme concentrations. Bull. Math. Biol. 62, 483-499.
12. Schnell, S. and P. K. Maini (2002). Enzyme kinetics far from the standard quasi-steady-state and equilibrium approximations. Math. Comput. Model 35, 137-144.
13. Schnell, S. and C. Mendoza (1997). Closed form solution for time-dependent enzyme kinetics. J. Theor. Biol 187, 207-212.
14. Segel, L. A. (1988). On the validity of the steady-state assumption of enzyme kinetics. Bull. Math. Biol. 50, 579-593.
15. Segel, L. A. and M. Slemrod (1989). The quasi-steady-state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev. 31, 446-477.
16. Sols, A. and R. Marco (1970). Concentrations of metabolites and binding sites. Implications in metabolic regulation, in Current Topics in Cellular Regulation, Vol. 2, B. Horecker and E. Stadtman (Eds), New York: Academic Press, pp. 227-273.
17. van Slyke, D. D. and G. E. Cullen (1914). The mode of action of urease and of enzymes in general. J. Biol. Chem. 19, 141-180.
18. Tzafriri, A. R., M. Bercovier and H. Parnas (2002). Reaction diffusion modeling of the enzymatic erosion of insoluble fibrillar matrices. Biophys. J. 83, 776-793.