The condition for pseudo-first-order kinetics in enzymatic reactions is independent of the initial enzyme concentration

Biophysical Chemistry

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 165-174

  Schnell, S ^a,b   Mendoza, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b CHRIST CHURCH   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTO VENEZOLANO DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Fitting procedure; Flooding method; Michaelis Menten reaction; Progress curves; Pseudo first order kinetics; Rate constants

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENZYME KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MENTEN CONSTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1242338790     PISSN: 03014622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2003.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Boyde T.R.C. Foundation Stones of Biochemistry. 1980;Voile et Aviron, Hong Kong.
2. Kasserra H.P., Laidler K.J. Transient-phase studies of a trypsin-catalyzed reaction. Can. J. Chem. 48:1970;1793-1802.
3. Pettersson G. The transient-state kinetics of two-substrate enzyme systems operating by an ordered ternary-complex mechanism. Eur. J. Biochem. 69:1976;273-278.
4. Pettersson G. A generalized theoretical treatment of the transient-state kinetics of enzymic reaction systems far from equilibrium. Acta Chem. Scand. B. 32:1978;437-446.
5. Gutfreund H. Kinetics for Life Sciences: Receptors, Transmitters and Catalysis. 1995;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Fersht A.R. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: a Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding. 1999;Freeman, New York.
7. Silicio F., Peterson M.D. Ratio errors in pseudo first order reactions. J. Chem. Educ. 38:1961;576-577.
8. Moore J.W., Pearson R.G. Kinetics and Mechanism. 1981;Wiley, New York.
9. Espenson J.H. Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Mechanisms. 1995;McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
10. Corbett J.F. Pseudo first-order kinetics. J. Chem. Educ. 49:1972;663.
11. Schnell S., Maini P.K. Enzyme kinetics at high enzyme concentration. Bull. Math. Biol. 62:2000;483-499.
12. T.M. Lowry, W.T. John, Studies of dynamic isomerism. Part XII. The equations for two consecutive unimolecular changes, J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 97 (1910) 2635-2645.
13. Hijazi N.H., Laidler K.J. Transient-phase and steady-state kinetics for enzyme systems involving two substrates. Can. J. Biochem. 51:1973;832-840.
14. Gutfreund H., Sturtevant J.M. The mechanism of chymotrypsin-catalyzed reactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 42:1956;719-728.
15. Schnell S., Mendoza C. Closed form solution for time-dependent enzyme kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 187:1997;207-212.
16. Schnell S., Maini P.K. Enzyme kinetics far from the standard quasi-steady-state and equilibrium approximations. Math. Comput. Model. 35:2002;137-144.
17. Nölting B. Protein folding kinetics: Biophysical methods. 1999;Springer, Berlin.
18. Roussel M.R., Fraser S.J. Accurate steady-state approximations: implications for kinetics experiments and mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. 95:1991;8762-8770.
19. max estimates. Comments Theor. Biol. 8:2003;169-187.
20. Segel L.A. On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics. Bull. Math. Biol. 50:1988;579-593.
21. Briggs G.E., Haldane J.B.S. A note on the kinetic of enzyme action. Biochem. J. 19:1925;338-339.
22. Michaelis L., Menten M.L. Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochem. Z. 49:1913;333-369.
23. Shear D. An analog of the Boltzmann H-theorem (a Liapunov function) for systems of coupled chemical reactions. J. Theor. Biol. 16:1967;212-228.
24. Higgins J. Some remarks on Shear's Liapunov function for systems of chemical reactions. J. Theor Biol. 21:1968;293-304.
25. Okuda M. Inflector analysis of the second stage of the transient phase for an enzymatic one-substrate reaction. Prog. Theor. Phys. 68:1982;1827-1840.
26. Nguyen A.H., Fraser S.J. Geometrical picture of reaction in enzyme kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 91:1989;186-193.
27. Roussel M.R. Forced-convergence iterative schemes for the approximation of invariant manifolds. J. Math. Chem. 21:1997;385-393.
28. Segel L.A., Slemrod M. The quasi-steady-state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev. 31:1989;446-477.
29. Crooke P.S., Tanner R.D., Aris R. The role of dimensionless parameters in the briggs-haldane and Michaelis-Menten approximations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 34:1979;1354-1357.
30. Tanner R.D., Loo A.C., Shisler J.L., Reed M.W., Rowlett R.D., Morris J.W., et al. Mapping the lag phase and bounding the growth phase in fermentation reaction. AIChE Symp. Ser. 73:1976;55-65.
31. Schnell S., Mendoza C. Enzymological considerations for a theoretical description of the quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction (QC-PCR). J. Theor. Biol. 184:1997;433-440.
32. Schnell S., Mendoza C. Theoretical description for polymerase chain reaction. J. Theor. Biol. 188:1997;313-318.
33. Heinrich R., Schuster S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems. 1996;Chapman and Hall, New York.
34. Fell D.F. Understanding the Control of Metabolism. 1997;Portland Press, London.
35. Hammes G.G. Enzyme Catalysis and Regulation. 1982;Academic Press, New York.