The effect of two different faculty development interventions on third-year clerkship performance evaluations

Family Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 333-338

  Ogden, Paul E ^a   Edwards, Janine ^a   Howell, Martha ^a   Via, Robert M ^a   Song, Juhee ^a  

^a SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FAMILY MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS;

EID: 43549110900     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med 2003;15:270-92.
2. MacRae HM, Vu NV, Graham B, Word-Sims M, Colliver JA, Robbs RS. Comparing checklists and databases with physicians' ratings as measures of students' history and physical examination skills. Acad Med 1995;70:313-7.
3. Viswesvaran C, Ones D, Schmidt F. Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. J Appl Psychol 1996;81:557-74.
4. Nathan BR, Lord RG. Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: a process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings. J Appl Psychol 1983;68:102-14.
5. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75(October, suppl.):S6-S11 I.
6. Hasnain M, Connell KJ, Downing SM, Olthoff A, Yudkowsky R. Toward meaningful evaluation of clinical competence: the role of direct observation in clerkship ratings. Acad Med 2004;79:S21-S24.
7. Landon BE, Normand SL, Blumenthal D, Daley J. Physician clinical performance assessment: prospects and barriers. JAMA 2003;290:1183-9.
8. Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003;37:830-7.
9. Stillman PL, Swanson DB, Regan MB, et al. Assessment of clinical skills of residents utilizing standardized patients: a follow-up study and recommendations for application. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:393-401.
10. Burdick WP, Schoffstall J. Observation of emergency medicine residents at the bedside: how often does it happen? Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:909-13.
11. Williams RG, Dunnington GL, Klamen DL. Forecasting residents' performance - partly cloudy. Acad Med 2005;80(5):415-22.
12. Magarian GJ, Mazur DJ. Evaluation of students in medicine clerkships. Acad Med 1990;65:341-5.
13. Vu NV, Henkle JQ, Colliver JA. Consistency of pass-fail decisions made with clinical clerkship ratings and standardized patient examination scores. Acad Med 1994;69:S40-S41.
14. Shea J, Norcini J, Kimball H. Relationships of ratings of clinical competence and ABIM scores to certification status. Acad Med 1993;68:S2-S24.
15. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL, Wenrich MD. Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Acad Med 1996;71:364-70.
16. Martin JA, Reznick RK, Rothman A, Tamblyn RM, Regehr G. Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination? Acad Med 1996;71:170-5.
17. Vu NV, Marcy ML, Colliver JA, Verhulst SJ, Travis TA, Barrows HS. Standardized (simulated) patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance checklist items. Med Educ 1992;26:99-104.
18. Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Ainsworth MA. An innovative evaluation method in an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med 1996;71:S76-S78.
19. Cohen GS, Blumberg P, Ryan NC, Sullivan PL. Do final grades reflect written qualitative evaluations of student performance? Teach Learn Med 1993;5:16-7.
20. Magarian GJ, Mazur DJ. A national survey of grading systems used in medicine clerkships. Acad Med 1990;65:636-9.
21. Barzansky B, Jonas HS, Etzel SI. Educational programs in US medical schools, 1997-1998. JAMA 1998;280:803-8.
22. Pangaro LN. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med 1999;74:1203-7.
23. Hemmer PA, Hawkins R, Jackson JL, Pangaro LN. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med 2000;75:167-73.
24. Bodenheimer T. Primary care - will it survive? N Engl J Med 2006;355(9):861-4.
25. Tamblyn R, Benaroya S, Snell L, McLeod P, Schnarch B, Abrahamowicz M. The feasibility and value of using patient satisfaction ratings to evaluate internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 1994;9:146-52.
26. Newble D. The critical incident technique: a new approach to the assessment of clinical performance. Med Educ 1983;17:401-3.
27. Rhoton MF, Furgerson CL, Cascorbi HE. Evaluating clinical competence in anesthesia: using faculty comments to develop criteria. Annu Conf Res Med Educ 1986;25:57-62.
28. Rhoton MF. A new method to evaluate clinical performance and critical incidents in anesthesia: quantification of daily comments by teachers. Med Educ 1989;23:280-9.
29. Rhoton MF, Barnes A, Rashburg M, Ronai A, Springman S. Influence of anesthesiology residents' noncognitive skills on the occurrence of critical incidents and the residents' overall clinical performances. Acad Med 1991;66:359-61.
30. Soglin DJ. The use of event report cards in the evaluation of pediatric residents: a pilot study. Chicago: University of Illinois, Department of Medical Education, 1996.
31. Brennan BG, Nonnan GR. Use of encounter cards for evaluation of residents in obstetrics. Acad Med 1997;72:S43-S44.
32. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:795-9.
33. Wigdor AK, Green BF, eds. Performance assessment for the workplace, volume 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
34. Berk RA, ed. Performance assessment: methods and applications. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
35. Wiener EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, eds. Cockpit resource management. San Diego: Academic, 1993.
36. Hunt RA, Hinkle JE, Malony HN, eds. Clergy assessment and career development. Nashville, Tenn: Abingdon, 1990.
37. Santy PA. Choosing the right stuff: the psychological selection of astronauts and cosmonauts. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 1994.
38. Toquam JL, Macaulay JL, Westra CD, Fujita Y, Murphy SE. Assessment of nuclear power plant crew performance variability. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C, eds. Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1997;253-87.