Driving out Alternative Ways of Seeing: The Significance of Neo-Liberal Policy Mechanisms for UK Primary Care Research

Social Theory and Health

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 316-337

  Shaw, Sara E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discourse analysis; Governmentality; Health research policy; Neo liberalism; Primary care

Indexed keywords

EID: 43449139010     PISSN: 14778211     EISSN: 1477822X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700102     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ball DF, Butler J (2004). The implicit use of business concepts in the UK research assessment exercise. R&D Management 34: 87-97
2. Black N (1997). A national strategy for research and development: lessons from England. Annual Review of Public Health 18: 485-505
3. Bonell C (2006). Normalized management of HIV prevention services in an advanced liberal NHS in the 1990s. Critical Public Health 16: 89-97
4. Carter YH, Elwyn G (2003). History and structure of research in primary care. In: Jones R, Britten N, Culpepper L, Gass D, Grol R, Mant D and Silagy C (eds). The Oxford Textbook of Primary Medical Care. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp 503-506
5. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (1993). Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science Engineering and Technology. Cmnd 2250. HMSO: London
6. Demeritt D (2000). The new social contract for science: accountability, relevance, and value in US and UK science and research policy. Antipode 32: 308-329
7. Department of Health (1991). Research for Health. A Research and Development Strategy for the NHS. HMSO: London
8. Department of Health (1998). A First Class Service: Quality in the New NHS. DH: London
9. Department of Health (2000). Research and Development for a First Class Service: R&D Funding in the New NHS. DH: Leeds
10. Department of Health (2001a). Science and Innovation Strategy. DH: London
11. Department of Health (2001b). Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. DH: London
12. Department of Health (2004). Research for Patient Benefit Working Party: Final Report. DH: London
13. Department of Health & Medical Research Council (2005). A Primary Care Clinical Research Network for England (PCRN-E). DH and MRC Primary Care Research Infrastructure Working Party: London
14. Department of Trade and Industry (2003a). Innovation Report. Competing in the Global Economy: The Innovation Challenge. DTI: London
15. Department of Trade and Industry (2003b). Bioscience 2015. Improving National Health, Increasing National Wealth. A Report to the Government by the Bioscience Innovation and Growth Team. HMSO: London
16. Edelman M (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago University Press: Chicago. Ferlie E, McNulty T (1999). ''Going to market'': changing patterns in the organisation and character of process research. Scandinavian Journal of Management 13: 367-387
17. Fischer F (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford University Press: Oxford
18. Foucault M (1986). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-77. Longman: New York
19. Foucault M (1994). Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984. Volume 3. Penguin Books: London
20. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Notwotney H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage: London
21. Griffiths Report (1983). NHS Management Inquiry. DHSS: London
22. Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block M (2006). Building health research systems to achieve better health. Health Research Policy and Systems 4, doi:10.1186/1478-4505-4-10
23. Hindess B (1996). Discipline and cherish: foucault on power, domination and government. In: Discourses of Power: from Hobbes to Foucault. Blackwell: Oxford
24. HM Treasury (2003). Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. Final Report. HM Treasury: London
25. HM Treasury (2004). Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014. HM Treasury: London
26. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (1995). Medical Research and the NHS Reforms. HL Paper 12. HMSO: London
27. Iedema R, Flabouris A, Grant S and Gorm C. (2006). Narrativizing errors of care: critical incident reporting in clinical practice. Social Science & Medicine 62: 133-144
28. Joyce P (2006). Governmentality and risk: setting priorities in the new NHS. Sociology of Health & Illness 23: 594-614
29. Kazancigil A (1998). Governance and science: market-like modes of maintaining society and producing knowledge. International Social Science Journal 155: 69-79
30. Kushner S (2005). Qualitative control: a review of the framework for assessing qualitative evaluation. Evaluation 11: 111-122
31. Larner W (2000). Neo-liberalism; policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy 63: 5-25
32. Lemke T (2006).'The birth of bio-politics': Michel Foucault's lecture at the College de France on neoliberal governmentality. Economy and Society 30: 190-207
33. Lord Haldane (1918). Report of the Machinery of Government Committee. Cmnd 9230. HMSO: London
34. Lord Privy Seal (1971). Framework for Government Research and Development. Cmnd 4814. HMSO: London
35. Lupton D (1999. Risk. Routledge: London
36. Marinker M (2006). Health policy and the constructive conversationalist. In: Marinker M (ed). Constructive Conversations About Health: Policy and Values. Radcliffe: Abingdon
37. May C (2006). Mobilising modern facts: health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health & Illness 28: 513-532
38. Merton RK (1942). The Sociology of Science. University of Chicago Press: Chicago
39. O'Neill O (2002). A Question of Trust. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
40. Papon P (1996). A new context for scientific expertise? Some lessons from the french experience. Minerva 34: 151-160
41. Parker I (2002). Critical Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke
42. Power M (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press: Oxford
43. Research and Development Task Force (1994). Supporting Research and Development in the NHS. A Report to the Minister for Health by a Research and Development Taskforce Chaired by Professor Anthony Culyer. HMSO: London
44. Ritzer G (2004). The McDonaldisation of Society [revised new century edn]. Pine Forge Press: London
45. Rose N (1996). Governing 'advanced' liberal democracies. In: Barry A, Osborne Tand Rose N (eds). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. University of Chicago Press: Chicago
46. Secretary of State for Health (1989). Working for Patients: The Health Service Caring for the 1990s (Cmnd 555). HMSO: London
47. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (2000). Excellence and Opportunity: A Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century. Cmnd 4814. TSO: London
48. Shore C, Wright S (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In: Strathern M (ed). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. Routledge: London. pp 57-89
49. Simons H (1996). The paradox of the case study. Cambridge Journal of Education 26: 225-241
50. Stein JA (2002). Globalisation, science, technology and policy. Science and Public Policy 29: 402-408
51. Stilgoe J, Irwin A, Jones K (2006). The Received Wisdom: Opening up Expert Advice. DEMOS: London
52. Stokes D (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institute: Washington
53. Williams T, May C, Mair F, Mort M, Gask L (2003). Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care. Health Policy 64: 39-54
54. Wilkie T (1991). British Science and Politics Since 1945. Blackwell: Oxford.