The implicit use of business concepts in the UK Research Assessment Exercise

R and D Management

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 87-97

  Ball, Derrick F ^a   Butler, Jeff ^b  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442275828     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00325.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Ball, D.F. (1997) Quality measurement as a basis for resource allocation: research assessment exercises in United Kingdom universities. R&D Management, 27, 3, 281-289.
2. Coombs, R. and Georghiou, L. (2002) A new 'Industrial Ecology'. Science, 296, 19 April, p 471.
3. Griffith, J. (1995) Research assessment: as strange a maze as ever men trod. Council for Academic Freedom and Academic Standards, Report no. 4, February.
4. HEFCE (1993) A Report for the Universities Funding Council on the conduct of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise published by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council and the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, June.
5. HEFCE (1995a) HEFCE Circular RAE96 2/95.
6. HEFCE (1995b) HEFCE Circular RAE96 3/95.
7. House of Commons (2002) Select Committee on Science and Technology, The Research Assessment Exercise, www.parliament.uk/commons/selcom/s&thome April.
8. National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society.
9. Roberts, G. (2003) Review of research assessment, Report by Sir Gareth Roberts to the UK funding bodies, Issued for consultation, Mayhttp://www.rareview.ac.uk/reports/roberts/roberts_surnmary.pdf
10. Royal Academy of Engineering (2002) Measuring Excellence.
11. Times Higher Education Supplement (1997) 24 January.
12. Times Higher Educational Supplement (1998) 6 March for England, 20 March for Scotland and Wales.