Qualitative Control: A Review of the Framework for Assessing Qualitative Evaluation

Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 111-122

  Kushner, Saville ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ethics frameworks; policy; qualitative evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444452518     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005053194     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cook, T. (1997) ‘Lessons Learned in Evaluation Over the Past 25 Years’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Fetterman, D. (2001) Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Greene, J. (2001) ‘The Relational and Dialogic Dimensions of Program Quality’, in A. P. Benson, D. M. Hinn and C. Lloyd (eds) Visions of Quality: How Evaluators Define, Understand and Represent Program Quality, Advances in Program Evaluation 7, pp. 57-72. London: JAI/Elsevier.
4. House, E. R. (1980) Evaluating with Validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Jenkins, B. and A. Gray (1999) ‘Police Evaluation in British Government: From Idealism to Realism?’, in R. C. Rist (ed.) Program Evaluation and the Management of Government: Patterns and Prospects Across Eight Nations. London: Transaction Publishers.
6. Kushner, S. (2000) Personalizing Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Mertens, D. (1999) ‘Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation’, American Journal of Evaluation 20(1): 1-14.
8. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
9. Ryan, K. E. and L. DeStefano (2003) Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue and Deliberation, New Directions for Evaluation 85. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Schwandt, T. A. (1996) ‘Farewell to Criteriology’, Qualitative Enquiry 2(1): 58-72.
11. Scriven, M. (2003) ‘Evaluation in the New Millenium: the Transdisciplinary Vision’, in S. I. Donaldson and M. Scriven (eds) Evaluating Social Programs and Problems: Visions for the New Millenium. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
12. Simons, H. and R. Usher, eds (2000) Situated Ethics in Educational Research. London: Routledge.
13. Spencer, L., J. Ritchie, J. Lewis and L. Dillon (2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: a Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. London: Cabinet Office.
14. Stake, R. E. (1986) Quieting Reform: Social Science and Social Action in an Urban Youth Program. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
15. Stake, R. E. (2003) Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Wax, M. L. and J. Cassell (1980) ‘From Regulation to Reflection: Ethics in Social Research’, The American Sociologist 16: 224-229.