Human schedule performance, protocol analysis, and the "silent dog" methodology

Psychological Record

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 405-422

  Cabello, Francisco ^a   Luciano, Carmen ^b   Gomez, Inmaculada ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LA RIOJA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344693338     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395482     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AUSTIN, J., & DELANEY, P. F. (1998). Protocol analysis as a tool for behavior analysis. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 41-56.
2. BARNES, D. (1989). Behavior-behavior analysis, human schedule performance, and radical behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 39, 339-350.
3. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1989). Instructed human fixed-interval perform-ance: The effects of the experimental settings. The Psychological Record, 39, 351-364.
4. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). Concurrent activities and instructed human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 501-520.
5. BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., & DYMOND, S. (2001). Self and self-directed rules, in S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
6. BARNES-HOLMES, D., O'HORA, D., ROCHE, B., HAYES, S. C., BISSETT, R. T., & LYDDY, F. (2001). Understanding and verbal regulation. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
7. BARON, A., KAUFMAN, A., & STAUBER, K. A. (1969). Effects of instructions and reinforcement feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 701-712.
8. BARRETT, D. M., DEITZ, S. M., GAYDOS, G. A., & QUINN, P. C. (1987). The effects of programmed contingencies and social conditions on response stereotipy with human subjects. The Psychological Record, 37, 489-505.
9. BENTALL, R. P., & LOWE, C. F. (1987). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: III. Instructional effects in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 177-190.
10. BENTALL, R. P., LOWE, C. F., & BEASTY, A. (1985). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 165-180.
11. CABELLO, F., BARNES-HOLMES, D., STEWART, I., & O'HORA, D. (2002). Using Visual Basic in the experimental analysis of behavior: A brief introduction. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 20, 18-21.
12. CABELLO, F., & O'HORA, D. (2002). Addressing the limitations of protocol analysis in the study of complex human behavior. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy [Revista Internacional de Psicologia y Terapia Psicologica], 2(2), 115-130.
13. CHASE, P. N., & DANFORTH, J. S. (1991). The role of rules in concept formation. In L J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.) Dialogues on verbal behavior. Reno: Context Press.
14. CRITCHFIELD, T. S., & EPTING, L. K. (1998). The trouble with babies and the value of bathwater: Complexities in the use of verbal reports as data. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 65-74.
15. CRITCHFIELD, T. S., TUCKER, J. A., & VUCHINICH, R. E. (1998). Self-report methods. In K. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
16. DIXON, M. R., & HAYES, L. J. (1998). Effects of differing instructional histories on the resurgence of rule-following. The Psychological Record, 48, 275-292.
17. ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18. GALIZIO, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53-70.
19. GOMEZ, I., & LUCIANO, M. C. (2000). Autocontrol a traves de reglas que alteran la function [Self-control through altering function rules]. Psicothema, 12, 418-425.
20. HARZEM, P., LOWE, C. F., & BAGSHAW, M. (1978). Verbal control in human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 28, 405-423.
21. HAYES, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog - verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon's Protocol Analysis: Verbal reports as data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351-363.
22. HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., HAAS, J. R., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule governed from schedule controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 137-147.
23. HAYES, S. C., WHITE, D., & BISSETT, R. T. (1998). Protocol analysis and the silent dog method of analyzing the impact of self-generated rules. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 57-63.
24. HAYES, S. C., ZETTLE, R., & ROSENFARB, I. (1989). Rule-following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
25. HOLLAND, J. G. (1958). Counting by humans on fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 179-181.
26. LATIES, V. G., & WEISS, B. (1963). Effects of a concurrent task on fixed-interval responding in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 431-436.
27. LEANDER, J. D., LIPPMAN, L. G., & MEYER, M. M. (1968). Fixed interval performance as related to instructions and subjects verbalizations of the reinforcement contingency. The Psychological Record, 18, 469-474.
28. LOWE, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and the organization of behavior. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
29. LOWE, C. F. (1983). Radical behaviorism and human psychology. In G. C. L. Daney (Ed.), Animal models of human behavior: Conceptual, evolutionary and neurobiological perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
30. LOWE, C. F., HARZEM, P., & HUGHES, S. (1978). Determinants of operant behavior in humans: Some differences from animals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 373-386.
31. LUCIANO, M. C. (1993). La conducta verbal a la luz de recientes investigaciones. Su papel sobre otras conductas verbales y no verbales [Verbal behavior according to recent research: its role on verbal and nonverbal behavior]. Psicothema, 5(2), 351-374.
32. MATTHEWS, B. A., CATANIA, A. C., & SHIMOFF, E. (1985). Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 155-164.
33. MATTHEWS, B. A., SHIMOFF, E., CATANIA, A. C., & SAGVOLDEN, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453-467.
34. MOLINA, F. J., & LUCIANO, M. C. (2002). Imitacion y descripcion de la tarea [Imitative behavior and description of the task]. Acta Comportamentalia, 10(1), 23-44.
35. POTTER, B., HUBER, S., & MICHAEL, J. (1997). The role of mediating verbal behavior in selection-based responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 41-56.
36. REHFELDT, R. A., & DIXON, M. R. (2000). Investigating the relation between self-talk and emergent stimulus relations. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 18, 28-29.
37. REHFELDT, R. A., DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L J., & STEELE, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48, 647-664.
38. REHFELDT, R. A., & HAYES, L. J. (2000). The long-term retention of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 405-428.
39. RIBES, E., & SANCHEZ, S. (1992). Individual behavior consistencies as interactive styles: Their relation to personality. The Psychological Record, 42, 369-387.
40. ROSENFARB, I. S., NEWLAND, M. C., BRANNON, S. E., & HOWEY, D. S. (1992). Effects of self-generated rules on the development of schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 107-121.
41. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. S. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127-190.
42. SHIMOFF, E. (1986). Post-session verbal reports and the experimental analysis of behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 19-22.
43. SHIMOFF, E., CATANIA, A. C., & MATTHEWS, B. A. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low rate performances to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207-220.
44. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
45. SKINNER, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
46. WEINER, H. (1970). Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 391-394.
47. WILLIAMS, R. A. (1985). Schedule performance and verbal behavior under solitary and social training conditions. Dissertation Abstracts International-B, 46, 687.
48. WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.
49. WULFERT, E., GREENWAY, D. E., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1994). Third-order equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 44, 411-439.
50. ZETTLE, R. D., & YOUNG, M. K. (1987). Rule-following and human operant responding: Conceptual and methodological considerations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 33-39.