Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences

NeuroImage

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 17-20

  Davatzikos, Christos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Morphometric analysis; Voxel

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; BRAIN; GENOTYPE; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 4344667151     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.010     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. NeuroImage. 11(6):2000;805-821
2. Bookstein F.L. 'Voxel-based morphometry' should not be used with imperfectly registered images. NeuroImage. 14:2001;1454-1462
3. Burges C.J.C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(2):1998;121-167
4. Chung M.K., Worsley K.J., Paus T., Cherif C., et al. A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry. NeuroImage. 14(3):2001;595-606
5. Davatzikos C., Vaillant M., Resnick S., Prince J.L., et al. A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 20:1996;88-97
6. Davatzikos C., Genc A., Xu D., Resnick S.M. Voxel-based morphometry using the RAVENS maps: methods and validation using simulated longitudinal atrophy. NeuroImage. 14:2001;1361-1369
7. Golland P., Grimson W., Eric L., Shenton M.E., et al. Deformation analysis for shape based classification. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2082:2001;517-530
8. Good C.D., Scahill R.I., Fox N.C., Ashburner J., et al. Automatic differentiation of anatomical patterns in the human brain: validation with studies of degenerative dementias. NeuroImage. 17(1):2002;29-46
9. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer Series in Statistics. 2001;Springer-Verlag, New York
10. Job D.E., Whalley H.C., McConnell S., Glabus M., et al. Structural gray matter differences between first-episode schizophrenics and normal controls using voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage. 17(2):2002;880-889
11. Kubicki M., Shenton M.E., Salisbury D.F., Hirayasu Y., et al. Voxel-based morphometric analysis of gray matter in first episode schizophrenia. NeuroImage. 17(4):2002;1711-1719
12. Lao Z., Shen D., Xue Z., Karacali B., et al. Morphological classification of brains via high-dimensional shape transformations and machine learning methods. NeuroImage. 21(1):2003;46-57
13. McIntosh A.R., Bookstein F.L., Haxby J.V., Grady C.L. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. NeuroImage. 3(3):1996;143-157
14. Mehta S., Grabowski T.J., Trivedi Y., Damasio H. Evaluation of voxel-based morphometry for focal lesion detection in individuals. NeuroImage. 20(3 SU):2003;1438-1454
15. Miller M., Banerjee A., Christensen G., Joshi S., et al. Statistical methods in computational anatomy. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 6:1997;267-299
16. Hulshoff Pol H.E., Schnack H.G., Mandl R.C.W., van Haren N.E.M., et al. Focal gray matter density changes in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 58(12):2001;1118-1125
17. Strother S.C., Kanno I., Rottenberg D.A. Principal component analysis, variance partitioning, and functional connectivity. J. Cereb. Flow Metab. 15(3):1995;355-360
18. Thompson P.M., MacDonald D., Mega M.S., Holmes C.J., et al. Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 21(4):1997;567-581