Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm)

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 157, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 442-456

  Braun, Claude M J ^a   Larocque, Caroline ^a   Achim, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Interhemispheric relay; Poffenberger; Simple reaction time; Spatial compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERHEMISPHERIC TRANSFER; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTING RESPONSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL FIELD; WRITING;

EID: 4344653809     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1858-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aglioti S, Dall'Agnola R, Girelli M, Marzi CA (1991) Bilateral hemispheric control of foot distal movements: evidence from normal subjects. Cortex 27:571-581
2. Anzola GP, Vignolo LA (1992) Interhemispheric communication following unilateral cerebrovascular lesions. Ital J Neurol Sci 13:649-655
3. Anzola GP, Bertoloni G, Buchtel HA, Rizzolatti G (1977) Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 15:295-302
4. Berlucchi G, Crea F, Di Stefane M, Tassinari G (1977) Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:505-517
5. Bisiacchi P, Marzi CA, Nicoletti R, Carena G, Mucignat C, Tomaiuolo F (1994) Left-right asymmetry of callosal transfer in normal human subjects. Behav Brain Res 64:173-178
6. Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol 106:3-22
7. Braun CMJ (1992) Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli. Neuropsychol Rev 3:321-365
8. Braun CMJ, Daigneault S (1994) Effects of a right hemifield advantage on crossed-uncrossed differentials in simple reaction time: toward a new model of interhemispheric relay. Acta Psychol 85:91-98
9. Braun CMJ, Daigneault S, Dufresne A, Miljours S, Collin I (1995) Does so-called interhemispheric transfer time depend on attention? Am J Psychol 108:527-546
10. Braun CMJ, Mailloux C, Dufresne A (1996) Left and right visual field advantages are a function of scotopic and photopic retinal adaptation respectively in simple reaction time to near-threshold targets. Acta Psychol 91:3-14
11. Braun CMJ, Achim A, Larocque C (2003) The evolution of the concept of interhemispheric relay time. In: Zaidel E, Iacoboni M, Pascual-Leone A (eds) The role of the human callosum in sensory motor integration: anatomy, physiology and behavior; individual differences and clinical applications. MIT Press, Boston, pp 237-259
12. Brebner J (1973) S-R compatibility and changes in RT with practice. Acta Psychol 37:93-106
13. Brebner J, Shephard M, Cairney P (1972) Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychol 36:1-15
14. Broadbent DE (1974) Division of function and integration of behavior. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences. Third study program. Academic Press, New York, pp 31-41
15. Corballis MC (1998) Interhemispheric neural summation in the absence of the corpus callosum. Brain 121:1795-1807
16. Dirnberger G, Greiner K, Duregger C, Endl W, Lindinger G, Lang W (2003) The effects of alteration of effector and side of movement on the contingent negative variation. Clin Neurophys 114:2018-2028
17. Di Stefano M, Salvadori C (1998) Asymmetry of the interhemispheric visuomotor integration in callosal agenesis. Neuroreport 9:1331-1335
18. Garcia-Colera A, Semjen A (1987) The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychol 66:237-250
19. Godbout JA, Achim A, Braun CMJ (1995) Modulation motrice des dynamiques interhémisphériques dans le paradigme de Poffenberger. Compte rendu du 18ième congrès de la Société Québécoise pour la Recherche en Psychologie (SQRP), Ottawa. p 72 (Abstract)
20. Hommel B (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward an empirical clarification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:764-775
21. Hommel B (1996a) No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Percept Psychophys 58:102-110
22. Hommel B (1996b) S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Q J Exp Psychol 49A:546-571
23. Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (1995) Channels of the corpus callosum. Evidence from simple reaction times to lateralized flashes in the normal and the split brain. Brain 118:779-788
24. Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (2003) Interhemispheric visuo-motor integration in humans: the role of the superior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia (in press)
25. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Mazziotta JC (1996) Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. J Neurophysiol 76:321-331
26. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Lenzi GL, Mazziotta JC (1997) Merging of oculomotor and somatomotor space coding in the human right precentral gyrus. Brain 120:1635-1645
27. Kinsbourne M (1970) The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol 3:193-201
28. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253-270
29. Marzi CA, Bisiacchi P, Nicoletti R (1991) Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 29:1163-1177
30. Marzi CA, Perani D, Tassinari G, Colleluori A, Maravita A, Miniussi C, Paulesu E, Scifo P, Fazio F (1999) Pathways of interhemispheric transfer in normals and in a split-brain subject. A positron emission tomography study. Exp Brain Res 126:451-458
31. Nicoletti R, Umiltá C (1989) Splitting visual space with attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:164-169
32. Poffenberger AT Jr (1912) Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nerve centers. Arch Psychol 23:1-65
33. Proctor RW, Lu CH (1999) Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice reaction tasks. Mem Cogn 27:63-77
34. Ratinckx E, Brysbaert M, Vermeulen E (2001) CRT screens may give rise to biased estimates of interhemispheric transmission time in the Poffenberger paradigm. Exp Brain Res 136:413-416
35. Riggio L, Gawryszewski L de G, Umiltá C (1986) What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychol 62:89-100
36. Rogers RD, Monsell S (1995) Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124:207-231
37. Rubichi S, Nicoletti R, Iani C, Umilta C (1997) The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1353-1367
38. Simon JR (1967) Choice reaction time as a function of auditory SR correspondence, age and sex. Ergonomics 10:659-664
39. Simon JR, Craft JL, Small QM (1970) Manipulating the strength of a stereotype: interference effects in an auditory information processing task. J Exp Psychol 86:63-68
40. Tagliabue M, Zorzi M, Umilta C, Bassignani F (2000) The role of long-term and short term memory links in the Simon effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:648-670
41. Wallace RJ (1971) S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J Exp Psychol 88:354-360