A combined penalty and recursive real-time formulation for multibody dynamics

Journal of Mechanical Design

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 602-608

  Cuadrado, J ^a   Dopico, D ^a   Gonzalez, M ^a   Naya, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS;

COMPLEX MULTIBODY SYSTEMS; MULTIBODY DYNAMICS; REAL TIME MOTION SIMULATION;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 4344591741     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1758257     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Campanelli, M., Berzeri, M., and Shabana, A. A., 2000, "Performance of the Incremental and Non-incremental Finite Element Formulations in Flexible Multibody Problems," ASME J. Mech. Des., 122(4), pp. 498-507.
2. Fox, B., Jennings, L. S., and Zomaya, A. Y., 2001, "Numerical Computation of Differential-algebraic Equations for Non-linear Dynamics of Multibody Systems Involving Contact Forces," ASME J. Mech. Des., 123(2), pp. 272-281.
3. Lankarani, H. M., 2000, "A Poisson-based Formulation for Frictional Impact Analysis of Multibody Mechanical Systems With Open or Closed Kinematic Chains," ASME J. Mech. Des., 122(4), pp. 489-497.
4. Elias, D. A., and Chiang, L. E., 2003, "Dynamic Analysis of Impact Tools by Using a Method Based on Stress Wave Propagation and Impulse-momentum Principle," ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(1), pp. 131-142.
5. Kim, C., and Ro, P. I., 2002, "An Accurate Full Car Ride Model Using Model Reducing Techniques," ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(4), pp. 697-705.
6. Kang, J. S., Bae, S., Lee, J. M., and Tak, T. O., 2003, "Force Equilibrium Approach for Linearization of Constrained Mechanical System Dynamics," ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(1), pp. 143-149.
7. Serban, R., and Haug, E. J., 2000, "Globally Independent Coordinates for Real-time Vehicle Simulation," ASME J. Mech. Des., 122(4), pp. 575-582.
8. Lin, S.-T., and Huang, J.-N., 2002, "Stabilization of Baumgarte's Method Using the Runge-Kutta Approach," ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(4), pp. 633-641.
9. Shabana, A. A., 1998, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. García de Jalón, J., and Bayo, E., 1994, Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. Cuadrado, J., Gutiérrez, R., Naya, M. A., and Morer, P., 2001 "A Comparison in Terms of Accuracy and Efficiency Between a MBS Dynamic Formulation With Stress Analysis and a Non-linear FEA Code," Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 51(9), pp. 1033-1052.
12. Rodríguez, J. I., 2000, "Analysis Eficiente de Mecanismos 3D con metodos topologicos y tecnologia de components en Internet," Ph.D. Thesis, University of Navarre, Spain.
13. Bayo, E., and Avello, A., 1994, "Singularity Free Augmented Lagrangian Algorithms for Constraint Multibody Dynamics," Nonlinear Dyn., 5, pp. 209-231.
14. Iltis Data Package, 1990, IAVSD Workshop, Herbertov, Czechoslovakia.
15. Angeles, J., and Ma, O., 1988, "Dynamic Simulation of n-axis Serial Robotic Manipulators Using a Natural Orthogonal Complement," Int. J. Robot. Res., 7(5), pp. 32-47.
16. Jiménez, J. M., 1993, "Kinematic and Dynamic Formulations for Real-time Simulation of Multibody Systems," Ph.D. Thesis, University of Navarre, Spain.
17. Featherstone, R., 1987, Robot Dynamics Algorithms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
18. Cuadrado, J., Cardenal, J., Morer, P., and Bayo, E., 2000, "Intelligent Simulation of Multibody Dynamics: Space-state and Descriptor Methods in Sequential and Parallel Computing Environments," Multibody Syst. Dyn., 4, pp. 55-73.
19. ADAMS 11.0.0 Product Guides, 2000.