Trends in diversity and abundance of obligate epiphytic bryophytes in a highly managed landscape

Ecography

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 567-576

  Vanderpoorten, Alain ^a   Engels, Patrick ^a   Sotiaux, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; BRYOPHYTE; CONSERVATION PLANNING; EPIPHYTE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; TREND ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; PICEA; PTERIDOPHYTA;

EID: 4344574263     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03890.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Andresen, E. 2003. Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. - Ecography 26 : 87-97.
2. Anon. 1993. Plan d'occupation des sols de Wallonie, 1/50 000. Final report. - Namur, Belgium.
3. Anon. 1995. Red data book of European bryophytes. - Trondheim, (see also internet updates at 〈http://www.nt.ntnu.no/~soder/ECCB/〉).
4. Anon. 2003. State of Europe's forests 2003. - MCPFE, Vienna.
5. Atkinson, M. D. and Atkinson, E. 2002. Biological flora of the British Isles. Sambucus nigra L. - J. Ecol. 90: 895-923.
6. Barkman, J. J. 1958. Ecology and phytosociology of cryptogamic epiphytes. - Van Gorcum, Assen.
7. Bates, J. W. and Brown, D. H. 1981. Epiphyte differentiation between Quercus petraea and Fraxinus excelsior trees in maritime area of southwest England. - Vegetatio 48: 61-70.
8. Bates, J. W. et al. 1997. Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a 'tetrad' transect across southern Britain 1. Geographical trends in abundance and evidence of recent change. - J. Bryol. 19: 685-714.
9. Berg, Å. et al. 2002. Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey. - Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 1479-1503.
10. Boudreault, C., Gauthier, S. and Bergeron, Y. 2000. Epiphytic lichens and bryophytes on Populus tremuloides along a chronosequence in the southwestern boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. - Bryologist 103: 725-738.
11. Brehm, G., Sussenbach, D. and Fiedler, K. 2003. Unique elevational diversity patterns of geometrid moths in an Andean montane rainforest. - Ecography 26: 456-466.
12. Buckley, P., Ito, S. and McLachlan, S. 2002. Temperate woodlands. - In: Perrow, M. R. and Davy, A. J. (eds), Handbook of ecological restoration. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 503-538.
13. Cattin, M. F. et al. 2003. The impact of mowing as a management strategy for wet meadows on spider (Araneae) communities. - Biol. Conserv. 113: 179-188.
14. Cobb, A. R. et al. 2001. Recolonization of bigleaf maple branches by epiphytic bryophytes following experimental disturbance. - Can. J. Bot. 79: 1-8.
15. Dierssen, K. 2001. Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. - Bryophytorum Bibl. 56: 1-289.
16. Draper, D. et al. 2003. Application of GIS in plant conservation programmes in Portugal. - Biol. Conserv. 113: 337-349.
17. Duckett, J. G., Goode, J. A. and Matcham, H. W. 2001. Studies of protonemal morphogenesis in mosses. VIII. The gemmiferous protonemata of Orthodontium and Dicranoweisia. - J. Bryol. 23: 181-193.
18. Düll, R. 1992. Indicator values of mosses and liverworts. - Script. Geobot. 18: 175-214.
19. Esseen, P. and Renhorn, K. 1998. Edge effects on an epiphytic lichen in fragmented forests. - Conserv. Biol. 12: 1307-1317.
20. Frahm, J.-P. 1992. Untersuchungen zur epiphytischen Moosvegetation der Vogesen. - Herzogia 9: 213-228.
21. Frisvoll, A. A. and Prestø, T. 1997. Spruce forest bryophytes in central Norway and their relationship to environmental factors including modern forestry. - Ecography 20: 3-18.
22. Fuller, R. J. and Peterken, G. F. 1995. Woodland and scrub. - In: Sutherland, W. J. and Hill, D. A. (eds), Managing habitats for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 329-361.
23. Glavich, D. A. 2003. The distribution, ecology, and taxonomy of Bryonia spiralifera and B. pseudocapillaris on the Samoa Peninsula, Humboldt Co., coastal northern California. - Bryologist 106: 588-595.
24. Glime, J. M. and Hong, W. S. 2002. Bole epiphytes on three conifer species from Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada. - Bryologist 105: 451-464.
25. Graae, B. J. 2000. The effect of landscape fragmentation and forest continuity on forest floor species in two regions of Denmark. - J. Veg. Sci. 11: 881-892.
26. Hannerz, M. and Hånell, B. 1997. Effects on the flora in Norway spruce forests following clearcutting and shelterwood cutting. - For. Ecol. Manage. 90: 29-49.
27. Herben, T. 1994. Local-rate of spreading and patch dynamics of an invasive moss species, Orthodontium lineare. - J. Bryol. 18: 115-125.
28. Hermy, M. et al. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. - Biol. Conserv. 91: 9-22.
29. Hodgetts, N. 1996. The conservation of lower plants in woodland. - Joint Nature Conservation Comm., Peterborough.
30. Holien, H. 1998. Lichens in spruce forest stands of different successional stages in central Norway with emphasis on diversity and old growth species. - Nova Hedw. 66: 283-324.
31. Honnay, O., Verheyen, K. and Hermy, M. 2002. Permeability of ancient forest edges for weedy plant species invasion. - For. Ecol. Manage. 161: 109-122.
32. Humphrey, J. W. et al. 2000. The importance of conifer plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. - Biol. Conserv. 96: 241-252.
33. Humphrey, J. W. et al. 2002. Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. - Biol. Conserv. 107: 165-180.
34. Jukes, M., Peace, A. J. and Ferris, R. 2001. Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain : the influence of site type, ground vegetation and stand structure. - For. Ecol. Manage. 148: 271-286.
35. Kautz, T. and Gradstein, S. R. 2001. On the ecology and conservation of Spruceanthus theobromae (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae) from western Ecuador. - Bryologist 104: 607-612.
36. Klein, J.-P. and Vanderpoorten, A. 1997. Bryophytic vegetation in riparian forests: their use in the ecological assessment of the connectivity between the Rhine and its floodplain. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 6: 257-265.
37. Loppi, S., Bonini, I. and De Dominicis, V. 1999. Epiphytic lichens and bryophytes of forest ecosystems in Tuscany (central Italy). - Cryptogamie Mycol. 20: 127-135.
38. Maldonado-Coelho, M. and Marini, M. A. 2004. Mixed species bird flocks from Brazilian Atlantic forest: the effects of forest fragmentation and seasonality on their size, richness and stability. - Biol. Conserv. 116: 19-26.
39. Mazimpaka, V. et al. 1997. An important area for Orthotrichum consimile Mitt. in Europe: the north-western Iberian Peninsula. - J. Bryol. 19: 832-834.
40. McGee, G. G. and Kimmerer, R. W. 2002. Forest age and management effects on epiphytic bryophyte communities in Adirondack northern hardwood forests, New York, USA. - Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1562-1576.
41. Moe, B. and Botnen, A. 2000. Epiphytic vegetation on pollarded trunks of Fraxinus excelsior in four different habitats at Grinde, Leikanger, western Norway. - Plant Ecol. 151: 143-159.
42. Newmaster, S. G. and Bell, F. W. 2002. The effects of silvicultural disturbances on cryptogam diversity in the boreal-mixedwood forest. - Can. J. For. Res. 32: 38-51.
43. Norden, B. and Appelqvist, T. 2001. Conceptual problems of ecological continuity and its bioindicators. - Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 779-791.
44. Norton, T. W. 1996. Conservation of biological diversity in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. - For. Ecol. Manage. 85: 1-7.
45. Peck, J. E. 1997. The association of commercially harvestable bryophytes and their host species in northwestern Oregon. - Bryologist 100: 383-393.
46. Pipp, A. K., Henderson, C. and Callaway, R. M. 2001. Effects of forest age and forest structure on epiphytic lichen biomass and diversity in a douglas-fir forest. - Northwest Sci. 75: 12-24.
47. Printzen, C. et al. 2002. New and interesting lichen records from old-growth forest stands in the German National Park Bayerischer Wald. - Nova Hedw. 74: 25-49.
48. Rambo, T. R. and Muir, P. S. 1998. Bryophyte species associations with coarse woody debris and stand ages in Oregon. - Bryologist 101: 366-376.
49. Rose, F. 1992. Temperate forest management: its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. - In: Bates, J. W. and Farmer, A. M. (eds), Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Clarendon Press, pp. 211-233.
50. Ross-Davis, A. L. and Frego, K. A. 2002. Comparison of plantations and naturally regenerated clearcuts in the Acadian forest: forest floor bryophyte community and habitat features. - Can. J. Bot. 80: 21-33.
51. Saetersdal, M. et al. 2004. Vascular plants as a surrogate species group in complementary site selection for bryophytes, macrolichens, spiders, carabids, staphylinids, snails, and wood living polyporous fungi in a northern forest. - Biol. Conserv. 115: 21-31.
52. Sillett, S. C. et al. 2000. Four years of epiphyte colonization in Douglas-fir forest canopies. - Bryologist 103: 661-669.
53. Sotiaux, A. and Vanderpoorten, A. 2001. Check-list of the bryophytes of Belgium. - Belg. J. Bot. 134: 97-120.
54. Stieperaere, H. and Jacques, E. 1995. The spread of Orthodontium lineare and Campylopus introflexus in Belgium. - Belg. J. Bot. 128: 117-123.
55. Summerville, K. S., Ritter, L. M. and Crist, T. O. 2004. Forest moth taxa as indicators of lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment. - Biol. Conserv. 116: 9-18.
56. Thompson, I. D., Baker, J. A. and Ter-Mikaelian, M. A. 2003. Review of the long-term effects of post-harvest silviculture on vertebrate wildlife, and predictive models, with an emphasis on boreal forests in Ontario, Canada. - For. Ecol. Manage. 177: 441-469.
57. Trass, H., Vellak, K. and Ingerpuu, N. 1999. Floristical and ecological properties for identifying of primeval forests in Estonia. - Ann. Bot. Fenn. 6: 67-80.
58. Van der Pluijm, A. 2001. Orthotrichum acuminatum H. Philib., a Mediterranan moss new to The Netherlands. - Lindbergia 26: 111-114.
59. Vanderpoorten, A. and Engels, P. 2002. The effects of environmental variation on bryophytes at a regional scale. - Ecography 25: 513-522.
60. Vanderpoorten, A., Sotiaux, A. and Sotiaux, O. 2001. Integrating bryophytes into a forest management plan: lessons from grid-mapping in the forest of Soignes. - Cryptogamie Bryol. 22: 217-230.
61. Vellak, K. and Paal, J. 1999. Diversity of bryophyte vegetation in some forest types in Estonia: a comparison of old unmanaged and managed forests. - Biodiv. Conserv. 8: 1595-1620.
62. Zartman, C. E. 2003. Habitat fragmentation impacts on epiphyllous bryophyte communities in central Amazonia. - Ecology 84: 948-954.