Spruce forest bryophytes in central Norway and their relationship to environmental factors including modern forestry

Ecography

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 3-18

  Frisvoll, Arne A ^a   Prestø, Tommy ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILBERRY; BRYOPHYTE; FORESTRY; LIVERWORT; MOSS; NORWAY SPRUCE;

NORWAY;

ERICACEAE; PICEA ABIES; PINACEAE; VACCINIUM MYRTILLUS;

EID: 0030618906     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00342.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen, R. B. and Peet, R. K. 1990. Gradient analysis of forests of the Sangre de Christo Range, Colorado. - Can. J. Bot. 68: 193-201.
2. Andersson, L. I. and Hytteborn, H. 1991. Bryophytes and decaying wood - a comparison between managed and natural forest. - Holarct. Ecol. 14: 121-130.
3. Anonymous 1984. Naturgeografisk regionindelning av Norden. - Nordiska Ministerrådet, Stockholm.
4. Aronsson, M., Hallingbäck, T. and Mattsson, J.-E. (eds) 1995. Rödlistade växter i Sverige 1995. - ArtDatabanken, Uppsala, in Swedish.
5. Aune, B. 1993. Air temperature normals, normal period 1961-1990. - Det norske meteorologiske inst., Report 02/93 Klima: 1-63.
6. Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M. and Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: Distribution and habitat associations. - Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731.
7. Borcard, D., Legendre, P. and Drapeau, P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. - Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
8. Braak, C. J. F. ter 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. - Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
9. _ 1987. CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principle components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). - TNO Inst. of Applied Computer Sci., Statistics Dept, Wageningen, Report 89 ITI A 11: 1-95.
10. Carleton, T. J. 1990. Variation in terricolous bryophyte and microlichen vegetation along primary gradients in Canadian boreal forests. - J. Veg. Sci. 1: 585-594.
11. Clausen, E. 1964. The tolerance of hepatics to desiccation and temperature. - Bryologist 64: 411-417.
12. Dahl, E., Elven, R., Moen, A. and Skogen, A. 1986. Vegetasjonsregionkart over Norge 1:1.5M. Nasjonalatlas for Norge, kartblad 4.1.1. - Statens Kartverk, Oslo.
13. Ehnström B. and Waldén, H. W. 1986. Faunavård i skogsbruket. Del 2 - Den lägre faunan. - Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, in Swedish.
14. Førland, E. J. 1993. Precipitation normals, normal period 1961-1990. - Det norske meteorologiske inst., Report 39/93 Klima: 1-63.
15. Fremstad, E. and Elven, R. 1991. Enheter for vegetasjonskartlegging i Norge. - NINA Utredning 28.
16. _ , Bendiksen, E., Flatberg, K. I., Frisvoll, A. A., Holien, H., Høiland, K., Prestø, T. and Svalastog, D. 1995. Planter i boreal skog - effekter av lokale faktorer, skogsdrift og omgivelser på artsmangfoldet. - Aktuelt fra Skogforsk 16-95: 1-32.
17. Frisvoll, A. A. in press. Bryophytes of 110 spruce forest stands in Central Norway. - Lindbergia.
18. _ and Blom H. H. 1992. Trua moser i Norge med Svalbard; raud liste. - NINA Utredning 42: 1-55.
19. _ , Elvebakk, A., Flatberg, K. I. and Økland, R. H. 1995. Sjekkliste over norske mosar. Vitskapleg og norsk namneverk. - NINA Temahefte 4: 1-104.
20. Gustafsson L. and Hallingbäck, T. 1988. Bryophyte flora and vegetation of managed and virgin coniferous forest in south-west Sweden. - Biol. Conserv. 44: 283-300.
21. Hafsten, U. 1992. The immigration and spread of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Norway. - Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr. 46: 121-158.
22. Hansson, L. (ed.) 1992. Ecological principles of nature conservation. - Elsevier, London.
23. Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest. Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. - Univ. Chicago Press.
24. _ and Silva-Lopez, G. 1992. Forest fragmentation and the conservation of biological diversity. - In: Fiedler, P. L. and Jain, S. K. (eds), Conservation biology: The theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. - Chapman and Hall, pp. 197-237.
25. Ingelög, T., Thor, G. and Gustafsson, L. (eds) 1984. Floravård i skogsbruket, del 1 - Allmän del. - Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, in Swedish.
26. _ , Thor, G. and Gustafsson, L. (eds) 1987. Floravård i skogsbruket, del 2 - Artdel. - Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, in Swedish.
27. Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F. and van Tongeren, O. F. R. (eds) 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. - Pudoc, Wageningen.
28. Jonsson, B. G. 1993. Treefall disturbance, succession, and diversity in boreal forest floor vegetation. - Ph.D.-thesis, Univ. of Umeå.
29. Laaka, S. 1992. The threatened epixylic bryophytes in old primeval forests in Finland. - Biol. Conserv. 59: 151-154.
30. Lahti, T. and Väisänen, R. A. 1987. Ecological gradients of boreal forests in South Finland: an ordination test of Cajander's forest site type theory. - Vegetatio 68: 145-156.
31. Lesica, P., McCune, B., Cooper, S. V. and Hong, W. S. 1991. Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. - Can. J. Bot. 69: 1745-1755.
32. Lid, J. and Lid, D. T. 1994. Norsk flora. - Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo.
33. Muhle, H. and LeBlanc, F. 1975. Bryophyte and lichen succession on decaying logs. I. Analysis along an evaporational gradient in eastern Canada. - J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 39: 1-33.
34. Økland, R. H. 1990. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. - Sommerfeltia Suppl. 1: 1-233.
35. _ and Bendiksen, E. 1985. The vegetation of the forest-alpine transition in the Grunningsdalen area, Telemark, SE Norway. - Sommerfeltia 2: 1-224.
36. _ and Eilertsen, O. 1993. Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal coniferous forests in the Solhomfjell area, Gjerstad, SE Norway. - Sommerfeltia 10: 1-254.
37. _ and Eilertsen, O. 1994. Canonical Correspondence Analysis with variation partitioning: some comments and an application. - J. Veg. Sci. 5: 117-126.
38. Økland, T. 1990. Vegetational and ecological monitoring of boreal forests in Norway. I. Rausjømarka in Akershus county, SE Norway. - Sommerfeltia 10: 1-52.
39. Persson, T. (ed.) 1980. Structure and function of northern coniferous forests - an ecosystem study. - Ecol. Bull. 32.
40. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. - Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
41. Söderström, L. 1981. Distribution of bryophytes in spruce forests on hillslopes in central Sweden. - Wahlenbergia 7: 141-153.
42. _ 1983. Hotade och sällsynta mossarter i norrländska granskogar. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 77: 4-12.
43. _ 1987a. Dispersal as limiting factor for distribution among epixylic bryophytes. - Symp. Biol. Hungarica 35: 475-483.
44. _ 1987b. The regulation of abundance and distribution patterns of bryophyte species on decaying logs in spruce forests. - Ph.D.-thesis, Univ. of Umeå.
45. _ 1988. The occurrence of epixylic bryophytes and lichen species in an old natural and managed forest stand in northeast Sweden. - Biol. Conserv. 45: 169-178.
46. _ 1989. Regional distribution pattern of bryophyte species on spruce logs in northern Sweden. - Bryologist 92: 349-355.
47. _ 1993. Substrate preference in some forest bryophytes: a quantitative study. - Lindbergia 18: 98-103.
48. _ and Jonsson, B. G. 1992. Naturskogarnas fragmentering och mossor på temporära substrat. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 185-198.
49. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. - Prentice Hall.