Renewal of the clinical-phase dental curriculum to promote better learning at the University of Oulu

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 120-126

  Hietala, Eeva Liisa ^a   Karjalainen, Asko ^a   Raustia, Aune ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Assessment; Authentic learning; Core analysis; Dental curriculum; Study load

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; FINLAND; HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL FUNCTION; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; TEACHING; WORKLOAD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; COMPREHENSIVE DENTAL CARE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, DENTAL; FINLAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MENTAL PROCESSES; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TEACHING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 4344570325     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00329.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fiehn NE. The basic science teaching experiences in the Nordic countries. Eur J Dent Educ 1998: 2: 115-123.
2. Kerosuo E, Ruotoistenmäki J, Murtomaa H. Report on the development of a new curriculum at Helsinki. Eur J Dent Educ 2001: 5: 23-29.
3. Spencer JA, Jordan RG. Learner-centered approach in medical education. BMJ 1999: 318: 1280-2183.
4. Shepherd KR, Nihill P, Botto RW, McCarthy MW. Factors influencing pursuit and satisfaction of academic dentistry careers: perceptions of new dental educators. J Dent Educ 2001: 9: 841-848.
5. Hietala E-L, Karjalainen A, Raustia A. Authentic learning - the strength of dental education. Innovations in higher education. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Printing House, 2000: 86 (Abstract).
6. Lapinlampi T (ed.). Vapailla Vesillä. Oulun Yliopistopaino, Oulu: Korkeakouluopetuksen Kehittämistoimikunta, 2000: 43-44.
7. Bertolami CN. Rationalizing the dental curriculum in light of current disease prevalence and patient demand for treatment: form vs. content. J Dent Educ 2001: 8: 725-735.
8. Tosteson DC. New pathways in general medical education. N Engl Med J 1999: 4: 234-238 (special article).
9. Moskona D, Kaplan I, Leibovich P, Notzer N, Begleiter A. A three-year programme in oral diagnosis and treatment planning. A model using an interdiscipilinary teaching team. Eur J Dent Educ 1999: 3: 27-30.
10. Garvey MT, O'Sullivan M, Blake M. Multidisciplinary case-based learning for undergraduate students. Eur J Dent Educ 2000: 4: 165-168.
11. Godfrey RC. Undergraduate examinations -a continuing tyranny. Lancet 1995: 345: 765-767.
12. van der Vleuten C. Validity of final examination in undergraduate medical training. Br Med J 2000: 11: 1217-1219.
13. Davis MH, Ben-David MF, Harden RMHPJ, Ker McGhee C, Pippard MJ, Snadden D. Portfolio assessment in medical students' final examinations. Med Teach 2001: 4: 357-366.
14. Wenzlav TL, Fager JJ, Coleman MJ. What is a rubric? Do practitioners and the literature agree? Contemp Educ 1999: 4: 41-46.
15. Marinho VCC, Richards D, Niederman R. Variation, certainty, evidence, and change in dental education: employing evidence-based dentistry in dental education. J Dent Educ 2001: 5: 449-455.
16. DentEdEvolves Visitation. Project no: 10059-CP-2-2001-1-ER-ERASMUS-ETN. Final agreement: 28374-IC-4-1999-1-IE-ERASMUS-EPS-1, 100.