Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding

Psychological Record

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 437-460

  O'Hora, Denis ^a,c   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Roche, Bryan ^a   Smeets, Paul ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344561745     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395484     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AYLLON T., & AZRIN, N. H. (1964). Reinforcement and instructions with mental patients. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 327-331.
2. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61-81.
3. BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & CULLINAN, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior. A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69-84
4. BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., DYMOND, S., & O'HORA, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. T. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
5. CHOMSKY, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
6. COHEN, J. D., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
7. CULLINAN, V., BARNES, D., HAMPSON, P. J., & LYDDY, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and nonexplicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559-585.
8. CULLINAN, V., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedures: Analyzing stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 121-145.
9. CULLINAN, V., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2000). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence II. The Psychological Record, 50, 467-492.
10. CULLINAN, V., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: The search for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 339-349.
11. DEGRANDPRE, R. J., & BUSKIST, W. F. (1991). Effects of accuracy of instructions on human behavior: Correspondence with reinforcement contingencies matters. The Psychological Record, 41, 371-384.
12. DERMER, M. L., & RODGERS, J. G. (1997). Schedule control over following instructions comprised of novel combinations of verbal stimuli. The Psychological Record, 47, 243-260.
13. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination functions in accordance with the derived stimulus relations of Sameness, More than, and Less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
14. GREEN, G., STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-615.
15. HAYES, L. J., THOMPSON, S., & HAYES, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 275-291.
16. HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations takes more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-244.
17. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
18. HAYES, S. C., ZETTLE, R. D., & ROSENFARB, I. (1989). Rule following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191-220). New York: Plenum.
19. HEALY, O., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998). Derived relational responding as an operant: The effects of between-session feedback. The Psychological Record, 48, 511-536.
20. HEALY, O., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207-227.
21. KAUFMAN, A., BARON, A., & KOPP, R. E. (1966). Some effects of instructions on human operant behavior. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 243-250.
22. LAZAR, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
23. LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioral Processes, 13, 205-215.
24. LYDDY, F. BARNES-HOLMES, D., & HAMPSON, P. (2001). Transfer of sequence function via equivalence in connectionist network. The Psychological Record, 51, 409-428.
25. MACCORQUODALE, K. (1969). B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. A retrospective appreciation. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 831-841.
26. O'HORA, D., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2001). The referential nature of rules and instructions: A response to "Instructions, rules, and abstraction: A misconstrued relation" by Emilio Ribes-Inesta. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 21-25.
27. O'HORA, D., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Developing a procedure to model the establishment of rule governance. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 19, 14-16.
28. O'HORA, D., ROCHE, B., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of Relational Frame Theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51-75.
29. OKOUCHI, H. (1999). Instructions as discriminative stimuli. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 205-214.
30. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
31. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-300.
32. SCHLINGER, H. D. (1993). Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 9-23.
33. SKINNER, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
35. WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). The transfer of conditional sequencing through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.