Synthetic compounding in the english interlanguage of Basque–Spanish bilinguals

International Journal of Multilingualism

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 231-257

  García Mayo, María del Pilar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

L3 acquisition; Multilingualism; Non target language representations; Synthetic compounding; Transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249154138     PISSN: 14790718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2167/ijm033.0     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agathopoulou, E., Compounds in the Greek-English interlanguage and the issue of non-target like syntactic representations versus surface problems. Paper presented at EUROSLA (European Second Language Association) 12. September18–22, Basel.
2. Agathopoulou, E., 2003. Noun-noun compounds in the Greek-English interlanguage, PhD dissertation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
3. Azkarate, M., 1995. “ Sobre los compuestos de tipo sustantivo+/sustantivo/adj deverbal en euskera ”. In De Gramática Generativa, Edited by:Goenaga, P., 39–50. Gasteiz:Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
4. Bybee, J., and Slobin, D., 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58:265–289.
5. Cenoz, J., and Hoffman, C., 2003. Acquiring a third language:What role does bilingualism play. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 1 (7):1–5.
6. Cenoz, J., and Valencia, J., 1994. Additive trilingualism:Evidence from the Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15:195–207.
7. Clahsen, H., 1991. German plurals in adult second language development:Evidence for a dual mechanism model of inflection. Arbeiten des SFB 282 (Theorie des Lexikons), 4:48–66.
8. Clahsen, H., 1995. “ German plurals in adult second language development:Evidence for a dual-mechanism model of inflection ”. In The Current State of Interlanguage:Studies in Honor of William E. Rutherford, Edited by:Eubank, L., Selinker, L., and Sharwood-Smith, M., 123–137. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
9. Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., and Marcus, G. F., 1992. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45:225–255.
10. Clark, E. V., and Barron, B. J.S., 1988. A thrower-button or a button-thrower? Children's judgments of grammatical and ungrammatical compound nouns. Linguistics, 26:3–19.
11. Clark, E. V., Hecht, B. F., and Mulford, R. C., 1986. Coining complex compounds in English:Affixes and word order in acquisition. Linguistics, 24:7–29.
12. De Angelis, G., and Selinker, L., 2001. “ Interlanguage transfer and competing linguistic systems ”. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition:A Psycholinguistic Perspective, Edited by:Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., and Jessner, U., 42–58. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
13. De Bot, K., 1992. A bilingual production model:Levelt's ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 19:471–490.
14. Desrochers, A., Liceras, J. M., Spradlin, T., and Fernández, R., 2003. “ Can an online response latency task shed light on native and non-native competence in the deverbal compounds of Spanish? ”. In L2 Links:Proceedings of the 2002 Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA-6) Conference, Edited by:Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H., and Goodluck, H., 64–70. Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Press.
15. Dewaele, J. M., 2001. “ Activation or inhibition? The interaction of L1, L2 and L3 on the language mode continuum ”. In Crosslinguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition:A Psycholinguistic Perspective, Edited by:Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., and Jessner, U., 69–89. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
16. Eckman, F., 1994. “ Local and long-distance anaphora in second language acquisition ”. In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition, Edited by:Tarone, E., Gass, S., and Cohen, A., 207–225. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Flynn, S., Foley, C., and Vinnitskaya, I., 2004. Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition:Comparing adults' and children's patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1 (1):3–16.
18. Franceschina, F., 2001. Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17:213–247.
19. García Mayo, M. P., 2002. The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12 (2):156–175.
20. Gass, S., 1983. “ Language transfer and universal grammatical relations ”. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, Edited by:Gass, S., and Selinker, L., 69–82. Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
21. Gordon, P., 1985. Level ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21:73–93.
22. Hawkins, R., and Chan, Y-C., 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition:The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13:187–226.
23. Hayes, J., Murphy, V., Davey, N., Smith, P., and Peters, L., The /s/ morpheme and the compounding phenomenon in English. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Study. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Herschensohn, J., 2000. The Second Time Around:Minimalism and L2 Acquisition, Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
25. Jarvis, S., 2000. Methodological rigor in the study of transfer:Identifying L1 influence on the initial lexicon. Language Learning, 50:245–309.
26. Jarvis, S., and Odlin, T., 2000. Morphological type, spatial reference and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22:535–556.
27. Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., and Prasada, S., 1991. Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15:73–218.
28. Kiparsky, P., 1982. “ From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology ”. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, Edited by:Van der Hulst, H., and Smith, N., 131–175. Dordrecht:Foris.
29. Lardiere, D., 1995. L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 11 (1):20–56.
30. Lardiere, D., 1998a. Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14:1–26.
31. Lardiere, D., 1998b. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14:359–175.
32. Lardiere, D., and Schwartz, B. D., 1997. Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds. Journal of Linguistics, 33:327–353.
33. Liceras, J. M., and Diaz, L., 2000. Triggers in L2 acquisition:The case of Spanish N-N compounds. Studia Linguistica, 54 (2):197–211.
34. Liceras, J. M., Mongeon, C., Cuza, A., Senn, C., and Spradlin, T., 2001. La adquisición en el aula sin input formal:los compuestos ‘exocéntricos’ de las interlenguas del español. Revista Electrónica E/LE 1 (Sección investigación- Lingüística), Madrid:Espasa Calpe.
35. Möhle, D., 1989. “ Multilingual interaction in foreign language production ”. In Interlingual Processes, Edited by:Dechert, H. W., and Rauparch, M., 179–194. Túbingen:Gunter Narr.
36. Murphy, S., 2003. Second language transfer during third language acquisition. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics, 3 (1):1–21.
37. Murphy, V. A., 1997. The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgment task. Second Language Research, 13:34–65.
38. Murphy, V. A., 2000. Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology. Language Learning, 50 (1):153–197.
39. Murphy, V. A., and Hayes, J., Processing compounds in the L2:The influence of the middle morpheme. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum. October3–6, Toronto, Canada.
40. Nicoladis, E., 1999. ‘Where is my brush-teeth?’ Acquisition of compound nouns in a bilingual child. Bilingualism:Language and Cognition, 2:245–256.
41. Nicoladis, E., 2002a. What is the difference between ‘toilet paper’ and ‘paper toilet’? French-English bilingual children's cross-linguistic transfer in compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 29 (4):843–863.
42. Nicoladis, E., 2002b. The cues that children use in acquiring adjectival phrases and compound nouns:Evidence from bilingual children. Brain and Language, 6 (1):635–648.
43. Nicoladis, E., 2003. Cross-linguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool bilingual children. Bilingualism:Language and Cognition, 6 (1):17–31.
44. Pinker, S., and Prince, A., Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Edited by:Sutton, L. A., Johnson, C., and Shields, R., pp. 230–251. Berkeley:Berkeley Linguistics Society.
45. Prévost, P., and White, L., 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16:103–133.
46. Safont Jordà, M. P., 2005. Third Language Learners. Pragmatic Production and Awareness, Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
47. Selinker, L., and Lakshmanan, U., 1993. “ Language transfer and fossilization:The ‘Multiple Effects Principle’ ”. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, Edited by:Gass, S., and Selinker, L., 197–216. Philadelphia, PA:John Benjamins.
48. Selkirk, E., 1982. The Syntax of Words, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
49. Slabakova, R., 2002. The compounding parameter in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (4):507–540.
50. Tsimpli, I-M., and Rousssou, A., 1991. Parameter resetting in L2. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 3:149–169.
51. White, L., 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.