Development of pragmatic language comprehension in Finnish-speaking children

First Language

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 279-296

  Loukusa, Soile ^a,b   Leinonen, Eeva ^b   Ryder, Nuala ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context and language; Finnish; Language development; Pragmatic comprehension; Relevance theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249132637     PISSN: 01427237     EISSN: 17402344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0142723707076568     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams, C. (2002). Practitioner review: The assessment of language pragmatics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(8), 973-987.
2. Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M. & Bucciarelli, M. (1999). Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children. Brain and Language, 68, 507-528.
3. Becker, J. A. (1990). Processes in the acquisition of pragmatic competence. In G. Conti-Ramsden & C. E. Snow (Eds), Children's language (pp. 7-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bezuidenhout, A. & Sroda, M. S. (1998). Children's use of contextual cues to resolve referential ambiguity: An application of Relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition, 6(1/2), 265-299.
5. Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
6. Blakemore, D. (1992). Understanding utterances - An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7. Blåfield, L. & Kuusinen, J. (1974). Suomalaisen ITPA:n psykometriset ominaisuudet [Psychometric features of Finnish ITPA Test]. Kasvatustieteiden tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja 241. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
8. Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L. & Bara, B. G. (2003). How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 207-241.
9. Buckley, B. (2003). Children's communication skills - From birth to five years. London: Routledge.
10. Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489-503.
11. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850-859.
12. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana.
13. Donaldson, M. (1992). Human minds: An exploration. London: Allen Lane.
14. Ehlers, S. & Gillberg, C. (1993). The epidemiology of Asperger syndrome. A total population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(8), 1327-1350.
15. Ehlers, S., Gillberg, C. & Wing, L. (1999). A screening questionnaire for Asperger Syndrome and other high-functioning autism spectrum disorders in school age children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 129-141.
16. Elrod, M. M. (1987). Children's understanding of indirect request. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148(1), 63-70.
17. Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1996). Context in language. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (Eds), Social interaction, social context, and language (pp. 21-36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Eson, M. E. & Shapiro, A. S. (1982). When 'don't' means 'do': Pragmatic and cognitive development in understanding an indirect imperative. First Language, 3, 83-91.
19. Foster-Cohen, S. (2000). Relevance theory and language acquisition: A productive paradigm shift? Child Language Bulletin, 20(1), 5-8.
20. Foster-Cohen, S. (2004a). Introduction: Relevance Theory and second language learning/behaviour. Second Language Research, 20(3), 189-192.
21. Gathercole, S. E. & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
22. Gibbs Jr, R. W. & Moise, J. F. (1997). Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition, 62, 51-74.
23. Gillam, R. B. & Bedore, L. M. (2000). Language science. In R. B. Gillam, T. P. Marquardt & F. N. Martin (Eds), Communication sciences and disorders - From science to clinical practice (pp. 385-408). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Club, Thomson Learning.
24. Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism. A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101-109.
25. Happé, F. G. E. (1995). Understanding minds and metaphors: Insight from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(4), 275-295.
26. Hassibi, M. & Breuer Jr, H. (1980). Disordered thinking and communication in children. New York: Plenum Press.
27. Jaswal, V. K. & Markman, E. M. (2001). Learning proper and common names in inferential versus ostensive contexts. Child Development, 72(3), 768-786.
28. Kaplan, E. F., Goodglass, H. & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
29. Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. D. & Kirk, W. S. (1968). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
30. Laine, M., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., Hänninen, R. & Niemi, J. (1997). Bostonin nimentätesti [The Boston Naming Test]. Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus Oy.
31. Leinonen, E. & Kerbel, D. (1999). Relevance theory and pragmatic impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34(4), 367-390.
32. Leinonen, E., Letts, C. & Smith, B. R. (2000). Children's pragmatic communication difficulties. London: Whurr Publishers.
33. Leinonen, E., Ryder, N., Ellis, M. & Hammond, C. (2003). The use of context in pragmatic comprehension by specifically language-impaired and control children. Linguistics, 41-2, 407-423.
34. Lloyd, P., Camaioni, L. & Ercolani, P. (1995). Assessing referential communication skills in the primary school years: A comparative study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 13-29.
35. Marinac, J. V. & Ozanne, A. E. (1999). Comprehension strategies: The bridge between literal and discourse understanding. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 15(3), 233-246.
36. Mattila, M.-L., Kielinen, M., Linna, S.-L., Ebeling, H. & Moilanen, I. (2001). Asperger syndrome project in Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District: Preliminary results from the screening by ASSQ. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 60, Suppl. 1, 66.
37. McTear, M. F. & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1992). Pragmatic disability in children. London: Whurr Publishers.
38. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds - How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
39. Milosky, L. M. (1992). Children listening: The role of world knowledge in language comprehension. In R. S. Chapman (Ed.), Processes in language acquisition and disorders (pp. 20-44). St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.
40. Nippold, M. A. & Rudzinski, M. (1993). Familiarity and transparency in idiom explanation: A developmental study of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 728-737.
41. Noh, E.-J. (2000). Metarepresentation - A relevance theory approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 31-39.
43. Oakhill, J. & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language and Speech, 29(1), 25-37.
44. O'Neill, D. K. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Development, 67, 659-677.
45. Prutting, C. A. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 123-134.
46. Robinson, E. J. (1994). What people say, what they think, and what is really the case: Children's understanding of utterances as sources of knowledge. In C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds), Children's early understanding of mind - Origins and development. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
47. Robinson, E. J. & Whittaker, S. J. (1987). Children's conceptions of relations between messages, meanings and reality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 81-90.
48. Ryder, N. & Leinonen, E. (2003). Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(4), 397-415.
49. Shatz, M. (1977). Children's comprehension of their mothers' question-directives. Journal of Child Language, 5, 39-46.
50. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1997). Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences. Multilingua, 16, 145-151.
51. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
52. Strohner, H. & Nelson, K. E. (1974). The young child's development of sentence comprehension: Influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies. Child Development, 45, 567-576.
53. Thompson, L. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence: Past findings and future directions for research. In L. Thompson (Ed.), Children talking - The development of pragmatic competence (pp. 3-21). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
54. Umstead, R. S. & Leonard, L. B. (1983). Children's resolution of pronominal reference in text. First Language, 4, 73-84.
55. Vieiro, P. & García-Madruga, J. A. (1997). An analysis of story comprehension through spoken and written summaries in school-age children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 41-53.
56. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D. & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684.
57. Wellman, H. M. & Lagattuta, K. H. (2000). Developing understanding of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg & D. J. Cohen (Eds), Understanding other minds (pp. 21-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Oxford: Blackwell.
59. Žegarac, V. (2004). Relevance Theory and the in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(3), 193-211.