Developmental bias in evolution: Evolutionary accessibility of phenotypes in a model evo-devo system

Evolution and Development

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 375-390

  Psujek, Sean ^a   Beer, Randall D ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENOTYPE; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 43249126505     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00245.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alberch, P. 1982. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. In J. T. Bonner (ed.). Evolution and Development: Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Evolution and Development. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
2. Alberch, P. Gale, E. A. 1983. Size dependence during the development of the amphibian foot. Colchicine-indiuced digital loss and reduction. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 76 : 177 197.
3. Alberch, P. Gale, E. A. 1985. A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reduction in amphibans. Evolution 39 : 8 23.
4. Arthur, W. 2001. Developmental drive: an important determinant of the direction of phenotypic evolution. Evol. Dev. 3 : 271 278.
5. Arthur, W. 2004a. The effect of development on the direction of evolution: toward a twenty-first century consensus. Evol. Dev. 6 : 282 288.
6. Arthur, W. 2004b. Biased Embryos and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Arthur, W. Farrow, M. 1999. The pattern of variation in centipede segment number an example of developmental constraint in evolution. J. theor. Biol. 200 : 183 191.
8. Ashe, H. L. Briscoe, J. 2006. The interpretation of morphogen gradients. Development 133 : 385 394.
9. Bacci, A. Huguenard, J. 2006. Enhancement of spike-timing precision by autapic transmission in neocortical inhibitory interneurons. Neuron 49 : 119 130.
10. Benson, D. L., Colman, D. R. Huntley, G. W. 2001. Molecules, maps, and synapse specificity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 : 899 909.
11. Brakefield, P. M. 2006. Evo-devo and constraints upon selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 : 362 368.
12. Brakefield, P. M., French, V. Zwaan, B. J. 2003. Development and the genetics of evolutionary change within insect species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34 : 633 660.
13. Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K. Weatherbee, S. D. 2001. From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Blackwell Science, Inc, Massachusetts.
14. Chen, B. E., et al. 2006. The molecular diversity of Dscam is functionally required for neuronal wiring specificity in Drosophila. Cell 125 : 607 620.
15. Chilton, J. K. 2006. Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Dev. Biol. 292 : 13 24.
16. Chipman, A. D., Arthur, W. Akam, M. 2004. A double segment periodicity underlies segment generation in centipede development. Curr. Biol. 14 : 1250 1255.
17. Dantzker, J. L. Callaway, E. M. 2000. Laminar sources of synaptic input to cortical inhibitory inerneuonrs and pyramidal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 7 : 701 707.
18. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
19. Driever, W. Nüsslein-Volhard, C. 1988. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell 54 : 95 104.
20. Ephrussi, A. Johnston, St. D. 2004. Seeing is believing: the Biocoid morphogen gradient matures. Cell 116 : 143 152.
21. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
22. Ford, E. B. 1971. Ecological Genetics. 3rd Ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
23. Frankino, W. A., Zwaan, B. J., Stern, D. L. Brakefield, P. M. 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307 : 718 720.
24. Frankino, W. A., Zwaan, B. J., Stern, D. L. Brakefield, P. M. 2007. Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly. Evolution 61 : 2958 2970.
25. Gardner, D. 1977. Voltage-clamp analysis of a self-inhibitory synaptic potential in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia. J. Physiol. 264 : 893 920.
26. Gilbert, S. F. 2006. Developmental Biology. 8th Ed. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
27. Gomez-Mestre, I. Buchholz, D. R. 2006. Developmental plasticity mirrors differences among taxa in spadefoot toads linking plasticity and diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 19021 19026.
28. Gould, S. J. Lewontin, R. C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205 : 581 598.
29. Gupta, A., Wang, Y. Makram, H. 2000. Organizing principles for a diversity of GABAergic interneurons and synapses in the neocortex. Science 287 : 273 278.
30. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The Causes Of Evolution. Longmans, Green and Co., New York.
31. Hummel, T., Vasconcelos, M. L., Clemens, J. C., Fishilevich, Y., Vosshall, L. B. Zipursky, S. L. 2003. Axonal targeting of olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila is controlled by Dscam. Neuron 37 : 221 231.
32. Jaeger, J. Reinitz, J. 2006. On the dynamic nature of positional information. BioEssays 28 : 1102 1111.
33. Jaeger, J., Sharp, D. H. Reinitz, J. 2007. Known maternal gradients are not sufficient for the establishment of gap domains in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech. Dev. 124 : 108 128.
34. Karabelas, A. B. Purpura, D. P. 1980. Evidence for autapses in the substantia nigra. Brain Res. 200 : 467 473.
35. Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Kopp, A., Duncan, I. Carroll, S. B. 2000. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosphila. Nature 408 : 553 559.
37. Kozloski, J., Hamzei-Sichani, F. Yuste, R. 2001. Stereotyped position of local synaptic targets in neocortex. Science 293 : 868 872.
38. Lewis, J. G. E. 1981. The Biology of Centipedes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Maynard Smith, J., et al. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on evolution and development. Q. Rev. Biol. 60 : 265 287.
40. Minelli, A., Foddai, D., Pereira, L. A. Lewis, J. G. A. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 38 : 103 117.
41. Nishikawa, K. C. 1997. Emergence of novel functions during brain evolution. Bioscience 47 : 341 354.
42. Park, M. R., Lighthall, J. W. Kitai, S. T. 1980. Recurrent inhibition in the rat neostiatum. Brain Res. 194 : 359 369.
43. Pouzat, C. Marty, A. 1998. Autaptic inhibitory currents recorded from interneurones from rat cerebellar slices. J. Physiol. 509 : 777 783.
44. Purves, D. Lichtman, J. 1985. Principles of Neural Development. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
45. Raff, R. A. 1996. The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
46. Remold, S. Lenski, R. E. 2004. Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli. Nature Genetics 36 : 423 426.
47. Rose, L. S. Kemphues, K. J. 1998. Early patterning of the C. elegans embryo. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32 : 521 545.
48. Salazar-Ciudad, I. Jernvall, J. 2002. A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 8116 8120.
49. Salazar-Ciudad, I. Jernvall, J. 2004. How different types of pattern formation mechanisms affect the evolution of form and development. Evol. Dev. 6 : 6 16.
50. Sanes, J. R. Yamagata, M. 1999. Formation of lamina-specific synaptic connections. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9 : 79 87.
51. Schmucker, D., et al. 2000. Drosophila Dscam is an axon guidance receptor exhibiting extraordinary molecular diversity. Cell 101 : 671 684.
52. Schuster, P. Fontana, W. 1999. Chance and necessity in evolution: lessons from RNA. Physica. D 133 : 427 452.
53. Schuster, P., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F. Hofacker, I. L. 1994. From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255 : 279 284.
54. Shen, K. Bargmann, C. I. 2003. The immunoglobulin superfamily protein SYG-1 determines the location of specific synapses in C. elegans. Cell 112 : 619 630.
55. Spencer, G. E., Lukowiak, K. Syed, N. I. 2000. Transmitter-receptor interactions between growth cones of identified Lymnaea neurons determine target cell selection in vitro. J. Neurosci. 20 : 8077 8086.
56. Sperry, R. W. 1963. Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 50 : 703 710.
57. True, J. R. Haag, E. S. 2001. Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Dev. 3 : 109 119.
58. Van der Loos, H. Glaser, E. M. 1972. Autapses in neocortex cerebri: synapses between a pyramidal cell's axon and its own dendrites. Brain Res. 48 : 355 360.
59. van Nimwegen, E., Crutchfield, J. P. Huynen, M. 1999. Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 9716 9720.
60. Weiss, K. M. Fullerton, S. M. 2000. Phenogenetic drift and the evolution of genotype-phenotype relationships. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57 : 187 195.
61. Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica, Version 5.2. Wolfram Research, Inc, Champaign, IL. 2005.
62. Wray, G. A. 2003. Transcriptional regulation and the evolution of development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47 : 675 684.
63. Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proc. 6th Int. Congress of Genetc. 1 : 356 366.
64. Yamagata, M., Weiner, J. A. Sanes, J. R. 2002. Sidekicks: synaptic adhesion molecules that promote lamina-specific connectivity in the retina. Cell 110 : 649 60.
65. Zhu, H., Hummel, T., Clemens, J. C., Berdnik, D., Zipursjky, S. L. Luo, L. 2006. Dendritic patterning by Dscam and synaptic partner matching in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 9 : 349 355.