Technology curriculum and planning for technology in schools: The flemish case

TechTrends

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 23-26

  Vanderlinde, Ruben ^a   Van Braak, Johan ^a   De Windt, Vicky ^a   Tondeur, Jo ^a   Hermans, Ruben ^a   Sinnaeve, Ilse ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249111059     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-008-0131-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395-414.
2. Bryderup, I. M., & Kowalski, K. (2002). The role of local authorities in the integration of ICT in learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 470-479.
3. Fishman, B. J., & Pinkard, N. (2001). Bringing urban schools into the information age: Planning for technology vs. technology planning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(1), 63-80.
4. Fishman, B. J., & Zhang, B. H. (2003). Planning for technology: The link between intentions and use. Educational Technology, 43(4), 14-18.
5. Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to succesful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4), 943-956.
6. Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology
7. Hermans, R., van Keer, H., & van Braak, J. (in press). Development of the beliefs about primary education scale: Distinguishing a developmental and transmissive dimension. Teachers and Teaching Education.
8. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
9. Jones, R. M. (2003). Local and national ICT policies. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
10. Lisbon European Council. (2000). Towards a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge. Retrieved December 3, 2007, from http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/ cha/c10241.htm
11. Ministry of the Flemish Community (2005). Education in Flanders. The Flemish educational landscape in a nutshell. Brussels: Ministry of the Flemish Community. Educational Information and Documentation Division. Retrieved October 28, 2007 from, http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/publicaties/eDocs/pdf/120.pdf
12. Tearle, P. (2004). A theoretical and instrumental framework for implementing change in ICT in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(3), 331-351.
13. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 962-976.
14. Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Accepted for publication in Computers and Education.
15. van Braak, J. (2003). Opstellen van beleidplannen voor ICT in het onderwijs. [Redacting policy plans for ICT in education]. ICT en onderwijsvernieuwing, 7, 67-82.
16. Vandenbroucke, F. (2007). Competenties voor de kennismaatschappij: Beleidsplan ICT in het onderwijs [Competencies for the knowledge based society: Policy plan for ICT in education]. Brussels: Flemish Ministry of Education.
17. Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Hermans, R. (2007, October). School conditions fostering the implementation of a new technology curriculum: Development of a theoretical framework. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Anaheim, CA, USA