Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 807-813

  Versiani, Marco Aurélio ^a   Pascon, Elizeu Álvaro ^a   Alves de Sousa, Cássio José ^b   Borges, Marco Aurélio Gagliardi ^a   Sousa Neto, Manoel Damião ^c  

^a ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ODONTOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TIME; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MOLAR; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 43249084110     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Siqueira Jr. J.F. Reaction of periradicular tissues to root canal treatment: benefits and drawbacks. Endod Topics 10 (2005) 123-147
2. Peters O.A. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 30 (2004) 559-567
3. Hülsmann M., Peters O.A., and Dummer P.M.H. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 10 (2005) 30-76
4. Bergmans L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Beullens M., Wevers M., Van Meerbeek B., and Lambrechts P. Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 35 (2002) 820-828
5. Paqué F., Musch U., and Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 8-16
6. Al-Sudani D., and Al-Shahrani S. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe nickel titanium rotary systems. J Endod 32 (2006) 1198-1201
7. Veltri M., Mollo A., Pini P.P., Ghelli L.F., and Balleri P. In vitro comparison of shaping abilities of ProTaper and GT rotary files. J Endod 30 (2004) 163-166
8. Gluskin A.H., Brown D.C., and Buchanan L.S. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 476-484
9. Rhodes J.S., Pitt Ford T.R., Lynch J.A., Liepins P.J., and Curtis R.V. A comparison of two nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques in teeth using microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J 33 (2000) 279-285
10. Kalender W.A., and Polacin A. Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys 18 (1991) 910-915
11. Hübscher W., Barbakow F., and Peters O.A. Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 740-747
12. Peters O.A., Peters C.I., Schönenberger K., and Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 86-92
13. Bergmans L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Wevers M., and Lambrechts P. A methodology for quantitative evaluation of root canal instrumentation using microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 390-398
14. Uyanik M.O., Cehreli Z.C., Mocan B.O., and Dagli F.T. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography. J Endod 32 (2006) 668-671
15. Tasdemir T., Aydemir H., Inan U., and Unal O. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 402-408
16. Peters O.A., Schönenberger K., and Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 221-230
17. Schneider S.W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 32 (1971) 271-275
18. Pruett J.P., Clement D.J., and Carnes Jr. D.L. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 23 (1997) 77-85
19. Calhoun G., and Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14 (1988) 273-277
20. Iqbal M.K., Firic S., Tulcan J., Karabucak B., and Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 359-364
21. Guelzow A., Stamm O., Martus P., and Kielbassa A.M. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 743-752
22. Yang G.B., Zhou X.D., Zheng Y.L., Zhang H., Shu Y., and Wu H.K. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 40 (2007) 707-714
23. Hartmann M.S.M., Barletta F.B., Fontanella V.R.C., and Vanni J.R. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Endod 33 (2007) 962-965
24. Kum K.Y., Spångberg L., Cha B.Y., Il-Young J., Msd, Seung-Jong L., and Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 26 (2000) 719-723
25. Yun H.H., and Kim S.K. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95 (2003) 228-233
26. Schäfer E., and Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 229-238
27. Bergmans L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Beullens M., Wevers M., Van Meerbeek B., and Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 288-295
28. Schaeffer M.A., White R.R., and Walton R.E. Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 31 (2005) 271-274