Comparative Evaluation of Three Nickel-Titanium Instrumentation Systems in Human Teeth Using Computed Tomography

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 668-671

  Ozgur Uyanik, M ^a   Cehreli, Zafer C ^a   Ozgen Mocan, Burce ^a   Tasman Dagli, Fugen ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Canal shape; computed tomography; image analysis; NiTi instruments; transportation

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MOLAR; NICKEL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TITANIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33745186451     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hülsmann M., Peters O.A., and Dummer P.M.H. Mechanical preparation of root canals. shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 10 (2005) 30-76
2. Gambill J.M., Alder M., and Del Rio C.E. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 22 (1996) 369-375
3. Glickman G.N., and Koch K.A. 21st century endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 131 (2000) 39-46
4. Weine F.S., Kelly R.F., and Lio P.J. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1 (1975) 255-262
5. Mizrahi S.J., Tucker J.W., and Seltzer S. A scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various endodontic instruments. J Endod 1 (1975) 324-333
6. Walton R.E. Histologic evaluation of different methods of enlarging the pulp canal space. J Endod 2 (1976) 304-311
7. Hülsman M., and Bluhm M. Efficacy, cleaning ability, and safety of different rotary instruments in root canal treatment. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 468-476
8. Schäfer E., and Vlasis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 239-248
9. Paqué F., Musch U., and Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 8-16
10. Peters O.A., Peters C.I., Schönenberger K., and Barbakow F. Protaper rotary root canal preparation. assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 93-99
11. Seidler B. Root canal fillings. an evaluation and method. J Am Dent Assoc 53 (1956) 567-576
12. Bramante C.M., Berbert A., and Borges R.P. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod 13 (1987) 243-245
13. Tachibana H., and Matsumoto K. Applicability of X-ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol 6 (1990) 16-20
14. Nielsen R.B., Alyassin A.M., Peters D.D., Carnes D.L., and Lancaster J.L. Microcomputed tomography. an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod 21 (1995) 561-568
15. Schneider S.W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32 (1971) 271-275
16. Stamm T., Kaup M., Hohoff A., Meier T., and Meyer U. Validity of a three-dimensional public-domain system for contemporary endodontic research. J Endod 29 (2003) 801-805
17. Stamm T., Meyer U., Meier N., Ehmer U., and Joos U. Public domain computer-aided surgery (CAS) in orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery. J Orofac Orthop 63 (2002) 62-75
18. Gluskin A.H., Brown D.C., and Buchanan L.S. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GTTM files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 476-484
19. Rhodes J.S., Pitt Ford T.R., Lynch J.A., Liepins P.J., and Curtis R.V. Microcomputed tomography. a new tool for experimental endodontology. Int Endod J 32 (1999) 165-170
20. Yun H., and Kim S.K. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95 (2003) 228-233
21. Yoshimine Y., Ono M., and Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 5 (2005) 373-375
22. Peters O.A., Peters C.I., Schönenger K., and Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation. effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 86-92
23. Calberson F.L.G., Deroose C.A.J.G., Hommez G.M.G., and De Moor R.J.G. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 613-623
24. Iqbal M.K., Firic S., Tulcan J., Karabucak B., and Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 359-364
25. Bergmann L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Beullens M., Wevers M., Van Meerbeek B., and Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi Rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 288-295
26. Perez F., Schoumacher M., and Peli F. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals. stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium Hero Shaper. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 637-644
27. Guelzow A., Stamm O., Martus P., and Kielblassa. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 743-752