Validation of the Treatment Motivation Scales for forensic outpatient treatment (TMS-F)

Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 242-255

  Drieschner, Klaus H ^a,c   Boomsma, Anne ^b  

^a Forensic Psychiatric Center Oldenkotte   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Multitrait multimethod; Offender treatment; Test construction; Treatment engagement; Treatment motivation; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COGNITION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; NETHERLANDS; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; SEXUAL CRIME; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; COGNITION; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTIVATION; NETHERLANDS; OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEX OFFENSES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 43149096674     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: 15523489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191107311651     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J.S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
2. Angleitner, A., John, O.P., & Lhr, F.J. (1986). It's what you ask and how you ask it: An itemmetric analysis of personality questionnaires. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 61-108). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3. Barbaree, H.E. (2005). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1115-1131.
4. Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W.W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.
5. Cronbach, L.J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5 th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
6. Drieschner, K.H. (2005). Measuring treatment motivation and treatment engagement in forensic psychiatric outpatient treatment: Development of two instruments. Unpublished Dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
7. Drieschner, K.H., & Boomsma, A. (2008). The Treatment Motivation Scales for forensic outpatient treatment (TMS-F): Construction and psychometric evaluation. Assessment, [ XX, xx - xx ].
8. Drieschner, K.H., & Boomsma, A. (in press). The Treatment Engagement Rating Scale (TER) for outpatient offender treatment: description, psychometric properties, and norms. Psychology, Crime & Law.
9. Drieschner, K.H., Lammers, S.M.M., & Van der Staak, C.P.F. (2004). Treatment motivation: An attempt for clarification of an ambiguous concept. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1115-1137.
10. Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241-261.
11. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F.W., & Trierweiler, L.I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.
12. Falshaw, L., Friendship, C., Travers, R., & Nugent, F. (2003). Searching for what works: An evaluation of cognitive skills programmes. London: Home Office.
13. Funder, D.C., & Colvin, C.R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
14. Funder, D.C., & Colvin, C.R. (1997). Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 656-672). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Gerbing, D.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., & Biddle, S.J.H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 3-31.
17. Hemphill, J.F., & Hart, S.D. (2002). Motivating the unmotivated: Psychopathy, treatment, and change. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change: A guide to enhancing engagement in therapy (pp. 193-221). New York: John Wiley.
18. Howells, K., & Day, A. (2007). Readiness for treatment in high risk offenders with personality disorders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 47-56.
19. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
20. Hutchinson, S.R., & Olnos, A. (1998). Behavior of descriptive fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis using ordered categorical data. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 344-364.
21. Jackson, D.N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests. Psychological Review, 78, 229-248.
22. Judd, C.M., Smith, E.R., & Kidder, L.H. (1991). Research methods in social relations (6 th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23. Kenny, D.A., & Kashy, D.A. (1992). The analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmative factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
24. Kenny, D.A., & McCoach, D.B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-351.
25. Knight, K., Hiller, M.L., Broome, K.M., & Simpson, D.D. (2000). Legal pressure, treatment readiness, and engagement in long-term residential programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 101-115.
26. Knight, K., Holcom, M., & Simpson, D.D. (1994). TCU Psychosocial Functioning and Motivation Scales: Manual on psychometric properties. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University-Institute of Behavioral Research.
27. Kraus, S.J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
28. Lanyon, R.I. (2001). Psychological assessment procedures in sex offending. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 253-260.
29. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighting the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
30. Marques, J.K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & Van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California's sex offender treatment and evaluation project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
31. Marsh, H.W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Maxwell, S.R. (2000). Sanction threats in court-ordered programs: Examining their effects on offenders mandated into drug treatment. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 542-563.
33. McConnaughy, E.A., Prochaska, J.O., & Velicer, W.F. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 368-375.
34. McGuire, J. (Ed.). (1995). What works: Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35. McMurran, M. (Ed.). (2002). Motivating offenders to change: A Guide to enhancing engagement in therapy. New York: John Wiley.
36. Miller, W.R. (1985). Motivation for treatment: A review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 84-107.
37. Muthn, L.K., & Muthn, B.O. (2004). Mplus user's guide (version 3). Los Angeles: Muthn & Muthn.
38. Nieberding, R.J., Moore, J.T., & Dematatis, A.P. (2002). Psychological assessment of forensic psychiatric outpatients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 350-363.
39. Plemper, E. (2001). Ambulante forensische psychiatrie: Onderzoek forensisch psychiatrische poli-en dagklinieken [Forensic outpatient psychiatry: Investigation of forensic psychiatric outpatient treatment centers]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.
40. Rosenbaum, R.L., & Horowitz, M.J. (1983). Motivation for psychotherapy: A factorial and conceptual analysis. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 346-354.
41. Salize, H. J., & Dressing, H. (Eds.). (2005). Placement and treatment of mentally disordered offenders-legislation and practice in the European Union. Lengerich, FRG: Pabst Science.
42. Sellen, J.L., McMurran, M.M., Cox, W.M., Theodosi, E., & Klinger, E. (2006). The Personal Concerns Inventory (Offender Adaptation): Measuring and enhancing motivation to change. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 294-305.
43. Serin, R., & Kennedy, S. (1997). Treatment readiness and responsivity: Contributing to effective correctional programming. Ottawa: Research Branch, Correctional Services of Canada.
44. Sijtsma, K., & Van der Ark, L.A. (2003). Investigation and treatment of missing item scores in test and questionnaire data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 505-528.
45. Tierney, D.W., & McCabe, M.P. (2002). Motivation for behavior change among sex offenders: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 113-129.
46. Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546-558.
47. Webster, C.D., Douglas, K.S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S.D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
48. West, S.G., Finch, J.F., & Curran, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Williamson, P., Day, A., Howells, K., Bubner, S., & Jauncey, S. (2003). Assessing offenders' readiness to change problems with anger. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 295-307.