Assessable consequences of through-bond donor-acceptor interactions in β-aminoketones

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1452-1463

  Lampkins, Andrew J ^a   Li, Yan ^a   Al Abbas, Alexandre ^a   Abboud, Khalil A ^a   Ghiviriga, Ion ^a   Castellano, Ronald K ^a  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Donor acceptor systems; Hyperconjugation; Reactivity; Strained molecules; Through bond interactions

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ESTERS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DONOR-ACCEPTOR SYSTEMS; HYPERCONJUGATION; REACTIVITY; STRAINED MOLECULES; THROUGH-BOND INTERACTIONS;

BOND LENGTH;

EID: 43149087226     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200701220     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. a) R. Hoffmann, A. Imamura, W. J. Hehre, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 1499-1509;
2. b) R. Hoffmann, Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 1-9;
3. c) R. Gleiter, W. D. Stohrer, R. Hoffmann, Helv. Chim. Acta 1972, 55, 893-906;
4. d) R. Gleiter. Angew. Chem. 1974, 86, 770-775;
5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1974, 13, 696-701;
6. e) M. N. Paddon-Row, Acc. Chem. Res 1982, 15, 245-251;
7. f) R. Gleiter, W. Schafer, Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 369-375.
8. For excellent leading references on hyperconjugation see: a) J. B. Lambert, Y. Zhao, R. W. Emblidge, L. A. Salvador, X. Liu, J.-H. So, E. C. Chelius, Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 183-190;
9. b) I. V. Alabugin, T. A. Zeidan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3175-3185;
10. c) I. V. Alabugin, M. Manoharan, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 9011-9024.
11. c-o, etc.).
12. a) R. C. Cookson, J. Henstock, J. Hudec, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 1060-1062;
13. b) R. C. Cookson, Proc. R. Sot: London Ser. A 1967, 297, 27-39.
14. a) J. Kulhan, J. Palecek, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1963, 28, 2260-2264;
15. b) W. A. Ayer, B. Altenkir, R. H. Burnell, M. Moinas, Can. J. Chem. 1969, 47, 449-455;
16. c) J. Hudec, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1970, 829-831;
17. d) T. Sasaki, S. Eguchi, T. Kiriyama, Y. Sakito, J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1648-1652;
18. e) A. W. J. Dekkers, J. W. Verhoeven, W. N. Speckamp, Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 1691-1696;
19. f) P. Pasman, J. W. Verhoeven, T. J. Deboer, Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 2827-2830;
20. g) A. M. Halpern, A. L. Lyons.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3242-3247;
21. h) J. R. Wiseman, H. O. Krabbenhoft, R. E. Lee, J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 629-632;
22. i) J. W. Verhoeven, in Electron Transfer-from Isolated Molecules to Biomolecules, Pt. 1, Vol. 106 (Eds.: J. Jortner, M. Bixon), 1999, pp. 603-644.
23. N. Risch, J. Chem. Soc Chem. Commun. 1983, 532-533.
24. a) H. Li, E. A. Homan, A. J. Lampkins, I. Ghiviriga, R. K. Castellano, Org. Lett. 2005. 7, 443-446;
25. b) A. J. Lampkins, O. Abdul-Rahim, H. Li, R. K. Castellano, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4471-4474;
26. c) B. G. Sumpter, V. Meunier, A. Vázquez-Mayagoitia, R. K. Castellano, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2007, 107, 2233-2242;
27. d) B. G. Sumpter, V. Meunier, E. F. Valeev, A. J. Lampkins, H. Li, R. K. Castellano, J. Phys. Chem. C in press.
28. Notably, treatment of triester-functionalized phloroglucinol derivatives with Lewis or prolic acids results, under certain condilions, in significant lactone formation. We are exploring this chemistry separately and will report on it in due course.
29. See a special issue on diastereoselectivity: a) A. S. Cieplak. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1265-1336;
30. b) W. Adcock, N. A. Trout, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1415-1435;
31. c) S. Tomoda. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1243-1263;
32. d) G. Mehta, J. Chandrasekhar, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1437-1467;
33. e) B. W. Gung, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1377-1386;
34. f) M. Kaselj, W. S. Chung, W. J. le Noble. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1387-1413.
35. a) J. M. Hahn, W.J. le Noble, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1916-1917;
36. b) E.M. Gonikberg, W.J. le Noble, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7751-7755;
37. c) B. W. Gung. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5263-5301;
38. d) M. Kaselj, E. M. Gonikberg, W. J. Ie Noble, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3218-3223;
39. e) S. Tomoda, T. Senju, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 5303-5318.
40. a) Y. Senda, M. Morita, H. Itoh, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 221-224;
41. b) Y. Senda, Chirality 2002, 14, 110-120.
42. a) J. M. Coxon, K. N. Houk, R. T. Luibrand, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 418-427;
43. b) V. Yadav, G. Senthil, D. Jeyaraj, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14211-14218;
44. c) F. Jimenez-Cruz, R. Cetina, H. Rios-Olivares, Chem. Lett. 2000, 956-957;
45. d) D. Moraleda, C. Ollivier, M. Santelli, Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5471-5474.
46. L. Verotta, O. Sterner, G. Appendino, E. Bombardelli, T. Pilati. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 5479-5484.
47. B. R. Cho, K. Chajara, H.J. Oh, K. H. Son, S.-J. Jeon. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1703-1706.
48. When the cyclization is performed in methanol, lhe triisopropyl ester (20%) is obtained in addition to two of the three possible methyl ester derivatives (the mono-, 21%, and bis-methylesler. 6 %)."
49. A.J. Lampkins, O. Abdul-Rahim, R. K. Castellano, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5815-5818.
50. B. W. Domagalska, L. Syper, K.A. Wilk, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1931-1939.
51. S. Simaan, J. S. Siegel, S. E. Biali, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3699-3701.
52. a) B. Krijnen, H. B. Beverloo, J. W. Verhoeven, C. A. Reiss, K. Goubitz, D. Heijdenrijk, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4433-4440;
53. b) D. J. A. De Ridder, K. Goubitz, H. Schenk, B. Krijnen, J. W. Verhoeven, Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 799-811;
54. c) D. J. A. De Ridder, K. Goubitz, H. Schenk, B. Krijnen, J. W. Verhoeven, Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 812-826.
55. R. K. Castellano. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 845-865.
56. Compared with similar isopropyl ester substituents in the CSD (HEFKOS10= 1.508Å; HEFKUY10= 1.509 Å).
57. J. P. Degelaen, P. Pham, E. R. Blout, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1984, 106, 4882-4890.
58. The X-ray structures of 6 and 7 have been collected at 173 K, while those taken from the literature for comparison have generally been collected at room temperature (290-295 K). The consequence of temperature on through-bond interactions in these systems (in the solid state) is not known.
59. N. Risch, M. Langhals, W. Mikosch, H. Bögge, A. Müller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9411-9412.
60. F. Jiménez-Cruz, R. Cetina-Rosado, S. Hernández-Ortega, R. A. Toscano, H. Ríos-Olivares, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2001, 57, 868-869.
61. F. Jiménez-Cruz, H. Ríos-Olivares, S. Hernández- Ortega, A. Cervantes-Nevarez. J. Mol. Struct. 2003, 655, 23-29.
62. Side-by-side analysis of some structures is complicated by substitution a to the nitrogen, although comparison to similarly substituted aza-adamantanes suggests that the substituents should have a marginal effect on the bond lengths and angles of the core. Reference [24] stales for 23 thai "the deformation of the tricyclic system induced by the incorporation of lhe phenyl ring is quite small."
63. P. W. Hickmott, M. G. Ahmed, S. A. Ahmed, S. Wood, M. Kapon, J. Chem. Sot: Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 2559-2571.
64. M. G. Ahmed, S. M. I. Moeiz, S. A. Ahmed, F. Kiuchi, Y. Tsuda, P. Sampson, J. Chem. Res. Synop. 1999, 316-317.
65. V. A. Tafeenko, A. E. Prozorovskii, V. V. Kovalev, I. V. Knyazeva, J. Struct. Chem. 1987, 28, 155-158.
66. a) D. A. Dougherty, W. D. Hounshell, H. B. Schlegel, R. A. Bell, K. Mislow. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17, 3479-3482;
67. b) D. A. Dougherty, H. B. Schlegel, K. Mislow, Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1441-1447;
68. c) E. Osawa, P. M. Ivanov, C. Jaime, J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3990-3993;
69. d) D. A. Dougherty, C. S. Choi, G. Kaupp, A. B. Buda, J. M. Rudzinski, E. Osawa, J. Chem. Sot: Perkin Trans. 2 1986, 1063-1070;
70. e) N. L. Allinger, K. S. Chen, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, S. R. Wilson, G. M. Anstead, J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 747-755;
71. f) K. K. Baldridge, T. R. Battersby, R. VernonClark, J. S. Siegel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7048-7054.
72. V. Galasso, THEOCHEM 2000, 528, 171-176.
73. a) A. M. Brouwer, B. Krijnen, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 32-40;
74. b) W. D. Ooslerbaan, R. W. A. Havenith, C. A. van Walree, L. W. Jenneskens, R. Gleiter, H. Kooijman, A. L. Spek, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1066-1074.
75. Worth noting. DFT-LDA/cc-pVDZ calculations already performed on 4 (and reported in ref. [7c]) show bond lengths and angles for the AAT core that agree very well with those reported herein (generally within 0.01 Åand 1.5°. respectively). Calculations al the molecular mechanics level (e.g. Amber* force field) do not reproduce the bond length changes, a phenomenon noted in ref. [31e] but argued against in ref. [31 f].
76. D. Kardel, W. Knoche, N. Risch, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 1455-1459.
77. The n-π* transition is too weak to be observed in these systems (see related results in ref. [5d]).
78. This is not the case for through-bond interactions that show marked charge-transfer character. See, for example, ref. [19].
79. Cooperative stretching of the carbonyls in these systems has been noted before (see below, ref. [43a]). but we could not find any references of a comprehensive study or discussion.
80. D. A. Lightner, T. D. Bouman, W. M. Donald Wijekoon, A. E. Hansen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 934-944.
81. D. Lenoir, P. Mison, E. Hyson, P. v. R. Schleyer, M. Saunders, P. Vogel, L. A. Telkowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2157-2164.
82. R. K. Murray, Jr., D. L. Goff, T. M. Ford, J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 3870-3874.
83. G. E. Henry, H. Jacobs, C. M. S. Carrington, S. McLean, W. F. Reynolds, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8663-8666.
84. a) N. Risch, Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 4849-4856;
85. b) N. Risch, U. Billerbeck, E. Krieger, Chem. Ber. 1992, 125, 459-465.
86. B. W. Gung, M. A. Wolf, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 232-236.
87. J. M. Grill, J. W. Ogle, S. A. Miller, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9291-9296.
88. H. Duddeck, V. Wiskamp, D. Rosenblum, J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 5332-5336.
89. The average value for 1-aza-adamantanediones from ref. [43a] is δ ≈ 207 ppm. Such an NMR comparison of course depends significantly on how the chemical shifts are referenced (as well as other parameters).
90. a) C. Worrell, J. W. Verhoeven, W. N. Speckamp, Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 3525-3531;
91. b) L. Toom, A. Kull, I. Kaljurand, I. Leito, H. Ottosson, H. Grennberg, A. Gogoll, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7155-7164.
92. The latter two reagents oxidize diaza-adamantanones: see ref. [5d].
93. K. Bowden, E. J. Grubbs, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 171-177.
94. a) L. M. Stock, J. Chem. Educ. 1972, 49, 400-404;
95. b) R. D. Topsom, Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1976, 12, 1-20;
96. c) R. Gleiter, M. Kobayashi, J. Kuthan, Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 2775-2781;
97. d) G. Spanka, P. Rademacher, J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 592-596.
98. P. Geneste, I. Hugon, C. Reminiac, G. Lamaty, J. P. Roque, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. Part 2 1976, 845-846.
99. a) C. A. Grob, P. W. Schiess. Angew. Chem. 1967, 79, 1-14:
100. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 1-15;
101. b) C. A. Grob, Angew. Chem. 1969, 81, 543-554;
102. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 535-546.
103. N. Risch, U. Billerbeck, B. Meyerroscher, Chem. Ber. 1993, 126, 1137-1140.
104. N. Risch, M. Langhals, T. Hohberg, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4465-4468.
105. 3J(H.H) ≈ 12 Hz.
106. T. Scherer, W. Hielkema, B. Krijnen, R. M. Hermant, C. Eijckelhoff, F. Kerkhof, A. K. F. Ng. R. Verleg, E. B. Vandertol, A. M. Brouwer, J. W. Verhoeven, Reci. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1993, 112, 535-548.
107. SHELXTL6, Bruker-AXS. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2000.
108. P. v. d. Sluis, A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1990, 46, 194-201.
109. A. L. Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7-13.