Three-dimensional virtual images modify the waveform of pupillary near response

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 79-83

  Matsuda, Taisuke ^a,c   Suzuki, Yasuo ^b  

^a SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TEINE KEIJINKAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c Obihiro Kosei Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Horizontal disparity; Pupillary near response; Three dimensional image; Vergence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EYE POSITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; PUPIL REFLEX; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; PUPIL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 43049144997     PISSN: 00215155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-007-0515-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kardon R. The pupil. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A, editors. Adler's physiology of the eye. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 713-743.
2. Fry GA. The relation of pupil size to accommodation and convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1945;22:451-465.
3. Knoll HA. Pupillary changes associated with accommodation and convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1949;26:346-357.
4. Alpern M, Manson GL, Jardinico RE. Vergence and accommodation (V). Pupil size changes associated with changes in accommodative vergence. Am J Ophthalmol 1961;52:762-767.
5. Backer WD, Ogle KN. Pupillary response to fusional eye movements. Am J Ophthalmol 1964;58:743-756.
6. Stakenburg, M. Accommodation without pupillary constriction. Vision Res 1991;31:267-273.
7. Phillips NJ, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation. Vision Res 1992;32:1775-1779.
8. Li Z, Sun F. Pupillary response induced by stereoscopic stimuli. Exp Brain Res 2005;160:394-397.
9. Hiraoka M, Moroda M, Touya Y, Hakamata N. Near triad meter: dynamic measurement of pupillometry with horizontal eye tracker by accommodative stimulation (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Ophthalmol Soc) 2003;107:702-708.
10. Tsuchiya K, Ukai K, Ishikawa S. A quasistatic study of pupil and accommodation after-effects following near vision. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989;9:385-391.
11. Suzuki Y, Onda Y, Katada S, Ino S, Ifukube T. Effects of an eye-glass-free 3-D display on human visual system. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2004;48:1-6.
12. Barbur JL, Harlow AJ, Sahraie A. Pupillary responses to stimulus structure, colour and movement. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992;12:137-141.
13. Huang G, Sun F. Human pupillary response to ramp changes in light intensity. Exp Neurol 1988;100:322-331.
14. Sahraie A, Barbur JL. Pupil response triggered by the onset of coherent motion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:494-500.
15. Young RS, Alpern M. Pupil responses to foveal exchange of monochromatic lights. J Opt Soc Am 1980;70:697-706.
16. Wann, JP, Rushton S, Mon-Williams M. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Res 1995;35:2731-2736.
17. Howarth PA, Costello PJ. The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness symptoms when an HMD was used as a personal viewing system. Displays 1997;18:107-116.
18. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP. Binocular virtual reality displays: when problems do and don't occur. Hum Factors 1998;40:42-49.
19. Rushton SK, Riddell PM. Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. Appl Ergon 1999;30:69-78.
20. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP, Rushton S. Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993;13:387-391.
21. Mon-Williams M, Plooy A, Burgess-Limerick R, Wann J. Gaze angle: a possible mechanism of visual stress in virtual reality headsets. Ergonomics 1998;41:280-285.
22. Iwasaki T, Tawara A. Effects of viewing distance on accommodative and pupillary responses following a three-dimensional task. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:113-118.
23. Hasebe H, Oyamada H, Ukai K, Toda H, Bando T. Changes in oculomotor functions before and after loading of a 3-D visually-guided task by using a head-mounted display. Ergonomics 1996;39:1330-1343.
24. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res 1998;38:2053-2066.
25. Kadlecova V, Peleska M, Vasko A. Dependence on age of the diameter of the pupil in the dark. Nature 1958;182:1520-1521.
26. Schafer WD, Weale RA. The influence of age and retinal illumination on the pupillary near reflex. Vision Res 1970;10:179-191.
27. Schaeffel F, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J Physiol 1993;461:301-320.