Pentachlorophenol removal from water using surfactant-enhanced filtration through low-pressure thin film composite membranes

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 154, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 426-431

  Kumar, Yogesh ^a   Popat, K M ^a   Brahmbhatt, H ^a   Ganguly, B ^a   Bhattacharya, A ^a  

^a CSIR CENTRAL SALT AND MARINE CHEMICALS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Molecular volume; Pentachlorophenol; Sodium dodecyl sulfate; Thin film composite membrane

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FILTRATION; PHENOLS; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

MOLECULAR VOLUME; PENTACHLOROPHENOL; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; THIN FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANE;

WATER TREATMENT;

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; GLUCOSE; PENTACHLOROPHENOL; SUCROSE;

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FILTRATION; PHENOLS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; WATER TREATMENT;

COMPOSITE; FILM; FILTRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM; MEMBRANE; PCP; PERMEABILITY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CROSSFLOW FILTRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE FILTER; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; WATER TREATMENT;

FILTRATION; GLUCOSE; PENTACHLOROPHENOL; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; POLYMERS; PRESSURE; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; SUCROSE; SULFONES; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 43049137720     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.060     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gzara L., and Dhahbi M. Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants. Desalination 137 (2001) 241-250
2. Huddleston J.G., Willauer H.D., Griffin S.T., and Rogers R.D. Aqueous polymeric solutions as environmentally benign liquid/liquid extraction media. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (1999) 2523-2539
3. -) removal. Water Res. 37 (2003) 2001-2012
4. McAlister K.A., Lee H., and Trevors J.T. Microbial degradation of pentachlorophenol. Biodegradation 7 (1996) 1-40
5. Baynes R.E., Brooks J.D., Mumtaz M., and Rivieri J.E. Effect of chemical interactions in pentachlorophenol mixtures on skin and membrane transport. Toxicol. Sci. 69 (2002) 295-302
6. Bhattacharya A., Ray P., Brahmbhatt H., Vyas K.N., Joshi S.V., Devmurari C.V., and Trivedi J.J. Pesticides removal performance by low-pressure reverse osmosis membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 102 (2006) 3575-3579
7. Radvanovic P., Thiel S.W., and Hwang S.T. Formation of asymmetric polysulfone membranes by immersion precipitation. Part II. The effects of casting solution and gelation bath compositions on membrane structure and skin formation. J. Membr. Sci. 65 (1992) 231-246
8. Dewar M.J.S., Zoebisch E.G., Healy E.F., and Stewart J.J.P. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 3902-3909
9. TITAN, Wavefunction Inc., 18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 370, Irvine, CA 92612, USA, Schrodinger Inc., 1500 SW First Avenue, Suite 1180, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
10. Levine I.N. Quantum Chemistry. 5th ed. (2000), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Chapter 16
11. Mazzobre M.F., Roman M.V., Mourelle A.F., and Horacio R.C. Octanol-water partition co-efficient of glucose, sucrose and trehalose. Carbohyd. Res. 340 (2005) 1207-1211
12. Merck, in: S. Budavari (Ed.), The Merck Index, 12th ed., Merck and Co., White House Station, NJ, 1996.
13. Gohil J.M., Bhattacharya A., and Ray P. Effect of polymeric surface-active agents in the phase inversion step of asymmetric membrane formation. J. Surf. Sci. Technol. 20 (2004) 1-7
14. Kiso Y., Nishimura Y., Kitao T., and Nishimura K. Rejection properties of non-phenylic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 171 (2000) 229-237
15. Vander Bruggen B., Schaep J., Maes W., Wilms D., and Vandecasteele C. Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground waters. Desalination 117 (1998) 139-147
16. Kosutic K., and Kunst B. Removal of organics from aqueous solutions by commercial RO and NF membranes of characterized porosities. Desalination 142 (2002) 47-56
17. Zhang Y., Vander Bruggen B., Chen G.X., Braeken L., and Vandecasteele C. Removal of pesticides by nanofiltration: effect of water matrix. Sep. Purif. Technol. 38 (2004) 163-172
18. Nunes S., and Pineman K.V. In: Nunes S.P., and Peinermann K.V. (Eds). Membrane Technology in the Chemical Industry (2006), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
19. Bhattacharya A., and Ray P. Studies on the surface tension of poly(vinyl alcohol): effect of concentration, temperation, and addition of chaotropic agents. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 93 (2004) 122-130
20. Peterson R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 83 (1993) 81-150
21. Chen S.S., Taylor J.S., Mulford L.A., and Norris C.D. Influence of molecular weight, molecular size, flux, and recovery for aromatic pesticide removal by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 160 (2004) 103-111
22. Bhattacharya A., and Ghosh P. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane: theory and application in separation of electrolytes. Rev. Chem. Eng. 20 (2004) 111-173
23. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., and Vandecasteele C. Influence of molecular size polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 156 (1999) 29-41
24. Christofi N., and Ivshina I.B. Microbial surfactants and their use in the field studies of soil remediation. J. Appl. MicroBiol. 93 (2002) 915-929
25. Childress A., and Elimlech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
26. Childress A., and Elimlech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716