Use of surfactant modified ultrafiltration for perchlorate (ClO4-) removal

Water Research

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 2001-2012

  Yoon, Jaekyung ^a   Yoon, Yeomin ^a,e   Amy, Gary ^a   Cho, Jaeweon ^b   Foss, David ^c   Kim, Tae Hyung ^d  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

^c WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS INC   (United States)

^d Lehigh University   (United States)

^e Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Perchlorate; Surfactant; Ultrafiltration; Water treatment; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

BINARY MIXTURES; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; NEGATIVE IONS; PORE SIZE; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

ELECTROSTATIC EXCLUSION;

ULTRAFILTRATION;

ANIONIC SURFACTANT; CATIONIC SURFACTANT; PERCHLORATE; RIVER WATER;

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; SURFACTANT; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; CONTACT ANGLE; FLOW RATE; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEASUREMENT; MEMBRANE; MODEL; NANOFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER ANALYSIS; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 0037402420     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00600-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Yoon Y. Rejection of perchlorate by reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes: mechanisms and modeling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA, 2001.
2. Strathmann H, Ho WS, Sirkar KK, editors. In: Membrane handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992.
3. Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J Membrane Sci. 112(2):1996;263-274.
4. Morel G., Ouazzani N., Graciaa A., Lachaise J. Surfactant modified ultrafiltration for nitrate ion removal. J Membrane Sci. 134(1):1997;47-57.
5. Cho J., Amy G., Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter. factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux-decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane J Membrane Sci. 164:2000;89-110.
6. Childress A., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membrane Sci. 119:1996;253-268.
7. Cho J., Amy G., Pellegrino J., Yoon Y. Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization. Desalination. 118(1-3):1998;101-108.
8. Her N., Amy G., Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants. identification and control Desalination. 132(1-3):2000;143-160.
9. Zhang W., Hallstrom B. Membrane characterization using the contact angle technique: I. Methodology of the captive bubble technique. Desalination. 79(1):1990;1-12.
10. Gekas V., Persson K.M., Wahlgren M., Sivik B. Contact angles of ultrafiltration membranes and their possible correlation to membrane performance. J Membrane Sci. 72(3):1992;293-302.
11. Cho J., Amy G., Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter. initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes Water Res. 33(11):1999;2517-2526.
12. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics Lide DR, editor in chief, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 76th Edition, 1995. p. 5-91.
13. Porter M.C. Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Develop. 11(3):1972;234-248.
14. Wilbert M.C., Delagah S., Pellegrino J. Variance of streaming potential measurements. J Membrane Sci. 161(1-2):1999;247-261.
15. Rosa M., de Phino M. Membrane surface characterization by contact angle measurements using the immersed method. J Membrane Sci. 131(1-2):1997;167-180.
16. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ Sci Technol. 34(17):2000;3710-3716.