Sound-induced brain activity depends on stimulus subjective salience in female zebra finches

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 331, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 347-356

  Vignal, Clémentine ^a   Bouchut, Colette ^a   Mathevon, Nicolas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Call; Female songbird; Hippocampus; Individual recognition; Stimulus subjective salience; Zebra finch; ZENK

Indexed keywords

IMMEDIATE EARLY PROTEIN; IMMEDIATE EARLY PROTEIN ZENK;

BRAIN; MATE RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; SONGBIRD;

ACOUSTIC STRESS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FINCH; HIPPOCAMPUS; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SONGBIRD; SOUND DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TELENCEPHALON;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; BRAIN; FEMALE; FINCHES; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; SOUND; TELENCEPHALON; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

PASSERI; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

EID: 43049092958     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Kuhl P.K. Human speech and birdsong: communication and the social brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 9645-9646
2. Marler P. Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels?. Am. Sci. 58 (1970) 669-673
3. Marler P., and Doupe A.J. Singing in the brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 2965-2967
4. Brainard M.S., and Doupe A.J. What songbirds teach us about learning. Nature 417 (2002) 351-358
5. Catchpole C.K., and Slater P.J.B. Bird Song (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6. Kroodsma D.E., and Miller E.H. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (1996), Comstock, Ithaca, NY, USA
7. Williams H. Birdsong and singing behavior. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1016 (2004) 1-30
8. Marler P. Bird calls: their potential for behavioral neurobiology. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1016 (2004) 31-44
9. Mello C.V. Mapping vocal communication pathways in birds with inducible gene expression. J. Comp. Physiol. 188 (2002) 943-959
10. Jarvis E.D., Gunturkun O., Bruce L., Csillag A., Karten H., Kuenzel W., Medina L., Paxinos G., Perkel D.J., Shimizu T., Striedter G., Wild J.M., Ball G.F., Dugas-Ford J., Durand S.E., Hough G.E., Husband S., Kubikova L., Lee D.W., Mello C.V., Powers A., Siang C., Smulders T.V., Wada K., White S.A., Yamamoto K., Yu J., Reiner A., and Butler A.B. Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat. Rev. 6 (2005) 151-159
11. Reiner A., Perkel D.J., Mello C.V., and Jarvis E.D. Songbirds and the revised avian brain nomenclature. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1016 (2004) 77-108
12. Gentner T.Q., Hulse S.H., and Ball G.F. Functional differences in forebrain auditory regions during learned vocal recognition in songbirds. J. Comp. Physiol. 190 (2004) 1001-1010
13. Ball G.F., and Gentner T.Q. They're playing our song: gene expression and birdsong perception. Neuron 21 (1998) 271-274
14. Bolhuis J.J., Hetebrij E., Den Boer-Visser A.M., De Groot J.H., and Zijlstra G.G. Localized immediate early gene expression related to the strength of song learning in socially reared zebra finches. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 2165-2170
15. Vignal C., Attia J., Mathevon N., and Beauchaud M. Background noise does not modify song-induced genic activation in the bird brain. Behav. Brain Res. 153 (2004) 241-248
16. Boumans T., Vignal C., Smolders A., Sijbers J., Verhoye M., Van Audekerke J., Mathevon N., and Van der Linden A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in zebra finch discerns the neural substrate involved in segregation of conspecific song from background noise. J. Neurophysiol. 99 (2008) 931-938
17. Ribeiro S., Cecchi G.A., Magnasco M.O., and Mello C.V. Toward a song code: evidence for a syllabic representation in the canary brain. Neuron 21 (1998) 359-371
18. Eda-Fujiwara H., Satoh R., Bolhuis J.J., and Kimura T. Neuronal activation in female budgerigars is localized and related to male song complexity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17 (2003) 149-154
19. Gentner T.Q., Hulse S.H., Duffy D., and Ball G.F. Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. J. Neurobiol. 46 (2001) 48-58
20. Maney D.L., MacDougall-Shackleton E.A., MacDougall-Shackleton S.A., Ball G.F., and Hahn T.P. Immediate early gene response to hearing song correlates with receptive behavior and depends on dialect in a female songbird. J. Comp. Physiol. 189 (2003) 667-674
21. Bolhuis J.J., Zijlstra G.G., den Boer-Visser A.M., and Van Der Zee E.A. Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 2282-2285
22. Hernandez A.M., and MacDougall-Shackleton S.A. Effects of early song experience on song preferences and song control and auditory brain regions in female house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). J. Neurobiol. 59 (2004) 247-258
23. Sockman K.W., Gentner T.Q., and Ball G.F. Complementary neural systems for the experience-dependent integration of mate-choice cues in European starlings. J. Neurobiol. 62 (2005) 72-81
24. Aubin T., and Jouventin P. How to identify vocally a kin in a crowd? The penguin model. Adv. Stud. Behav. 31 (2002) 243-277
25. Beer C.G. Individual recognition of voice in the social behavior of birds. Adv. Stud. Behav. 3 (1970) 27-74
26. Falls J.B. Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In: Kroodsma D.E., and Miller E.H. (Eds). Acoustic Communication in Birds (1982), Academic Press, New York 273-278
27. Jouventin P., Aubin T., and Lengagne T. Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim. Behav. 57 (1999) 1175-1183
28. Lampe H.M., and Slagsvold T. Female pied flycatchers respond differently to song of mates, neighbours and strangers. Behaviour 135 (1998) 269-285
29. Marzluff J.M. Vocal recognition of mates by breeding Pinyon Jays, Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus. Anim. Behav. 36 (1988) 296-298
30. Miller D.B. The acoustic basis of mate recognition by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Anim. Behav. 27 (1979) 376-380
31. Robertson B.C. Vocal mate recognition in a monogamous, flock-forming bird, the silvereye, Zosterops lateralis. Anim. Behav. 51 (1996) 303-311
32. Butterfield P.A. The pair bond in the Zebra finch. In: Crook J.H. (Ed). Social Behaviour in Birds and Mammals: Essays on the Social Ethology of Animals and Man (1970), Academic Press, London 249-278
33. Zann R. The Zebra Finch: a Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
34. Vicario D.S., Naqvi N.H., and Raksin J.N. Sex differences in discrimination of vocal communication signals in a songbird. Anim. Behav. 61 (2001) 805-817
35. Zann R. Structural variation in the zebra finch distance call. Z. Tierpsychol. 66 (1984) 328-345
36. Vignal C., Mathevon N., and Mottin S. Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice. Nature 430 (2004) 448-451
37. Vignal C., Mathevon N., and Mottin S. Mate recognition by female zebra finch: Analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process. Behav. Proc. 77 (2008) 191-198
38. Aubin T. Syntana: A software for the synthesis and analysis of animal sounds. Bioacoustics 6 (1994) 80-81
39. Simpson H.B., and Vicario D.S. Brain pathways for learned and unlearned vocalizations differ in zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 10 (1990) 1541-1556
40. Mello C.V., Vicario D.S., and Clayton D.F. Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 6818-6822
41. Gentner T.Q., and Margoliash D. Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature 424 (2003) 669-674
42. Gentner T.Q. Neural systems for individual song recognition in adult birds. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1016 (2004) 282-302
43. Terpstra N.J., Bolhuis J.J., Riebel K., van der Burg J.M., and den Boer-Visser A.M. Localized brain activation specific to auditory memory in a female songbird. J. Comp. Neurol. 494 (2006) 784-791
44. Terpstra N.J., Bolhuis J.J., and den Boer-Visser A.M. An analysis of the neural representation of birdsong memory. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 4971-4977
45. Colombo M., and Broadbent N. Is the avian hippocampus a functional homologue of the mammalian hippocampus?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24 (2000) 465-484
46. Shimizu T., Bowers A.N., Budzynski C.A., Kahn M.C., and Bingman V.P. What does a pigeon (Columba livia) brain look like during homing? Selective examination of ZENK expression. Behav. Neurosci. 118 (2004) 845-851
47. Watanabe S., and Bischof H.J. Effects of hippocampal lesions on acquisition and retention of spatial learning in zebra finches. Behav. Brain Res. 155 (2004) 147-152
48. Bailey D.J., Rosebush J.C., and Wade J. The hippocampus and caudomedial neostriatum show selective responsiveness to conspecific song in the female zebra finch. J. Neurobiol. 52 (2002) 43-51
49. Bailey D.J., and Wade J. FOS and ZENK responses in 45-day-old zebra finches vary with auditory stimulus and brain region, but not sex. Behav. Brain Res. 162 (2005) 108-115
50. Sadananda M., and Bischof H.J. Enhanced fos expression in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) brain following first courtship. J. Comp. Neurol. 448 (2002) 150-164
51. Sadananda M., and Bischof H.J. c-fos is induced in the hippocampus during consolidation of sexual imprinting in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Hippocampus 14 (2004) 19-27
52. Kruse A.A., Stripling R., and Clayton D.F. Context-specific habituation of the zenk gene response to song in adult zebra finches. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82 (2004) 99-108
53. McGregor P.K., Otter K., and Peake T.M. Communication networks: receiver and signaller perspectives. In: Espmark Y., Amundsen T., and Rosenqvist G. (Eds). Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication (2000), Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, Norway 329-340
54. Vignal C., Andru J., and Mathevon N. Social context modulates behavioural and brain immediate early gene responses to sound in male songbird. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22 (2005) 949-955