Female pied flycatchers respond differently to songs of mates, neighbours and strangers

Behaviour

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 269-285

  Lampe, Helene M ^a   Slagsvold, Tore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032388582     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853998793066249     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arnold, A.P. (1980). Sexual differences in the brain. - Am. Sci. 68, p. 165-173.
2. _, Bottjer, S.W., Brenowitz, E.A., Nordeen, E.J. & Nordeen, K.W. (1986). Sexual dimorphisms in the neural vocal control system in song birds: Ontogeny and phylogeny. - Brain Behav. Evol. 28, p. 22-31.
3. Baker, M.C., Bjerke, T.K., Lampe, H. & Espmark, Y. (1986). Sexual response of female Great Tits to variation in size of males' song repertoires. - Am. Nat. 128, p. 491-498.
4. _, _, _ & _ (1987). Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes. - Anim. Behav. 35, p. 395-401.
5. Ball, G.F., Casto, J.M. & Bernard, D.J. (1994). Sex differences in the volume of avian song control nuclei: Comparative studies and the issue of brain nucleus delineation. - Psychoneuroendocr. 19, p. 485-504.
6. Breiehagen, T. & Slagsvold, T. (1988). Male polyterritoriality and female-female aggression in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. - Anim. Behav. 36, p. 604-606.
7. Brenowitz, E.A. (1991). Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. - Science 251, p. 303-305.
8. _ & Kroodsma, D.E. (1996). The neuroethology of bird song. - In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E. Kroodsma & E.H. Miller, eds). Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, p. 285-304.
9. Clayton, N.S. (1988). Song discrimination learning in zebra finches. - Anim. Behav. 36, p. 1016-1024.
10. Cooney, R. & Cockburn, A. (1995). Territorial defence is the major function of female song in the superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus. - Anim. Behav. 49, p. 1635-1647.
11. Curio, E. (1959). Verhaltensstudien am Trauerschnäpper. Beiträge zur Etologie und Ökologie von Muscicapa h. hypoleuca Pallas. - Z. Tierpsychol. Beiheft 3, p. 1-118.
12. Cynx, J. & Nottebohm, F. (1992). Role of gender, season, and familiarity in discrimination of conspecific song by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, p. 1368-1371.
13. Dale, S., Amundsen, T, Lifjeld, J.T. & Slagsvold, T. (1990). Mate sampling behavior of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, p. 87-91.
14. DeVoogd, T.J. & Nottebohm, F. (1981). Sex differences in dendritic morphology of a song control nucleus in the canary: A quantitative Golgi study. - J. Comp. Neurology 196, p. 309-316.
15. Eens, M., Pinxten, R. & Verheyen, R.F. (1991). Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling. - Behaviour 116, p. 210-238.
16. Eriksson, D. & Wallin, L. (1986). Male bird song attracts females - a field experiment. -Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, p. 297-299.
17. Espmark, Y.E. & Lampe, H.M. (1993). Variations in the song of the pied flycatcher within and between breeding seasons. - Bioacoustics 5, p. 33-65.
18. Falls, J.B. (1982). Individual recognition by sounds in birds. - In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E. Kroodsma & E.H. Miller, eds). Academic Press, New York, London, p. 237-278.
19. Godard, R. (1991). Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory species. -Nature 350, p. 228-229.
20. Gurney, M.E. (1981). Hormonal control of cell form and number in the zebra finch song system. - J. Neurosci. 1, p. 658-673.
21. von Haartman, L. (1956). Territory in the pied flycatcher Muscicapa hypoleuca. - Ibis 98, p. 460-475.
22. Hovi, M. & Rätti, O. (1994). Mate sampling and assessment procedures in female pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). - Ethology 96, p. 127-137.
23. Hultsch, H. (1993). Psychobiological and ecological aspects of song learning and memorization. - Etología 3, p. 309-323.
24. _ & Todt, D. (1992). The serial order effect in the song acquisition of birds: relevance of exposure frequency to song models. - Anim. Behav. 44, p. 590-592.
25. Katz, L.C. & Gurney, M.E. (1981). Auditory responses in the zebra finch's motor system for song. - Brain Res. 211, p. 192-197.
26. Konishi, M. & Akutagawa, E. (1985). Neuronal growth, atrophy and death in a sexually dimorphic song nucleus in the zebra finch. - Nature 315, p. 145-147.
27. Lampe, H.M. & Espmark, Y.E. (1994). Song structure reflects male quality in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). - Anim. Behav. 47, p. 869-876.
28. _ & Sætre, G.-P. (1995). Female pied flycatchers prefer males with larger song repertoires. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, p. 163-167.
29. Lind, H., Dabelsteen, T. & McGregor, P.K. (1996). Female great tits can identify mates by song. - Anim. Behav. 52, p. 667-671.
30. Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R.V. (1992). The Pied Flycatcher. - T & AD Poyser, London.
31. Marler, P. (1991). Song-learning behavior: the interface with neuroethology. - Trends Neurosci. 14, p. 199-206.
32. McCasland, J. & Konishi, M. (1981). Interaction between auditory and motor activities in an avian song control nucleus. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, p. 1815-1819.
33. McGregor, P.K. & Avery, M.I. (1986). The unsung songs of great tits (Parus major): learning neighbours' songs for discrimination. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, p. 311-316.
34. Miller, D.B. (1979a). The acoustic basis of mate recognition by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttara). - Anim. Behav. 27, p. 376-380.
35. _ (1979b). Long-term recognition of father's song by female zebra finches. - Nature 280, p. 389-391.
36. Nemeth, E. (1994). Individuelles Erkennen des Gesangs durch die Weibchen und Gesangsaktivität der Männchen bei der Rohrammer (Emberiza schoeniclus). - J. Ornith. 135, p. 217-222.
37. Nottebohm, F. (1993). The search for neural mechanisms that define the sensitive period for song learning in birds. - Neth. J. Zool. 43, p. 193-234.
38. _ & Arnold, A.P. (1976). Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain. - Science 194, p. 211-213.
39. _, Kasparian, S. & Pandazis, C. (1981). Brain space for a learned task. - Brain Res. 213, p. 99-109.
40. Ratcliffe, L. & Otter, K. (1996). Sex differences in song recognition. - In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E. Kroodsma & E.H. Miller, eds). Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, p. 339-355.
41. Searcy, W.A. (1992). Measuring responses of female birds to male song. - In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (P.K. McGregor, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, p. 175-189.
42. Slagsvold, T., Amundsen, T., Dale, S. & Lampe, H. (1992). Female-female aggression explains polyterritoriality in male pied flycatchers. - Anim. Behav. 43, p. 397-407.
43. Stoddard, P.K. (1996). Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. - In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (D.E. Kroodsma & E.H. Miller, eds). Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, p. 356-374.
44. _, Beecher, M.D., Loesche, P. & Campbell, S.E. (1992). Memory does not constrain individual recognition in a bird with song repertoires. - Behaviour 122, p. 274-287.
45. Weary, D.M., Lemon, R.E. & Perreault, S. (1992). Song repertoires do not hinder neighbor-stranger discrimination. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, p. 441-447.
46. Wiley, R.H., Hatchwell, B.J. & Davies, N.B. (1991). Recognition of individual males' songs by female dunnocks: a mechanism increasing the number of copulatory partners and reproductive success. - Ethology 88, p. 145-153.
47. Williams, H. (1985). Sexual dimorphism of auditory activity in the zebra finch song system. - Behav. neural Biol. 44, p. 470-484.