Quantitative data analysis methods for bead-based DNA hybridization assays using generic flow cytometry platforms

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 467-476

  Corrie, S R ^a   Lawrie, G A ^a   Battersby, B J ^a   Ford, K ^a   Ruhmann A ^a   Koehler, K ^b   Sabath, D E ^b   Trau, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Absolute target quantitation; Bead assay; Beads; Equilibrium constant; Flow cytometry; Fold ratio; Microspheres; Molecular diagnostic; Quantitation; T test

Indexed keywords

CYTOKERATIN 19; MICROSPHERE; RNA;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL LABELING; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE; GENOMICS; HISTOGRAM; ISOTHERM; LABORATORY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REACTION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DNA; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMANS; KERATIN-19; MOLECULAR PROBE TECHNIQUES; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES; RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 42949176942     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20534     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Consortium TM. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducihility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24:1151-1161.
2. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FC, Kim IF, Markowitz V, Matese JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart J, Taylor R, Vilo J, Vingron M. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAMF) - Towards standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001; 29:365-271.
3. Naciff JM, Richardson BD, Oliver KG, Jump ML, Torontall SM, Juhlin KD, Carr GJ, Paine JR, Tiesman JP, Daston GP. Design of a microsphere-based high-throughput gene expression assay to determine estrogenic potential. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1164-1171.
4. Yang L, Tran DK, Wang X. BADGE, Beads Array for the Detection of Gene Expression, a high-throughput diagnostic bioassay. Genome Res 2001;11:1888-1898.
5. Fuja T, Hou S, Bryant P. A multiplex microsphere bead assay for comparative RNA expression analysis using flow cytometry. J Biotechnol 2004;108:193-205.
6. Spiro A, Lowe M. Quantitation of DNA sequences in environmental PCR products by a multiplexed head-based method. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:1010-1013.
7. Spiro A, Lowe M, Brown D. A bead-based method for multiplexed identification and quantitation of DNA sequences using flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:4258-4265.
8. Schmitt M, Bravo IG, Snijdcrs PJF, Gissmann L, Pawlita M, Waterboer T. Bead-based multiplex genotyping of human papillomaviruses. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:504-512.
9. Tan PK, Downey TJ, Spitznagel EL Jr, Xu P, Fu D, Dimitrov DS, Lempicki RA, Raaka BM, Cam MC. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:5676-5684.
10. Kuo WP, Liu F, Trimarchi J, Punzo C, Lombardi M, Sarang J, Whipple ME, Maysuria M, Serikawa K, Lee SY, McCrann D, Kang J, Shearstone JR, Burke J, Park DJ, Wang X, Rector TL, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Perrin S, Choi S, Bumgarner R, Kim JH, Short GF III, Freeman MW, Seed B, Jensen R, Church GM, Hovig E, Cepko CL, Park P, Ohno-Machado L, Jenssen TK. A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridisation-based technologies. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:832-840.
11. Barnes M, Freudenberg J, Thompson S, Aronow B, Pavlidis P. Experimental comparison and cross-validation of the affymetrix and illumina gene expression analysis platforms. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:5914-5923.
12. Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Roederer M. Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: Unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:648-655.
13. Dunbar SA, Vander-Zee CA, Oliver KG, Karen KL, Jacobson JW. Quantitative, multiplexed detection of bacterial pathogens: DNA and protein applications of the Luminex LabMAP system. J Microbiol Methods 2003;53:245-252.
14. Chatelier RC, Ashcroft RG. Calibration of flow cytometric fluorescence standards using the isoparametric analysis of ligand binding. Cytometry 1987;8:632-636.
15. McCoy SL, Hausman FA, Deffebach ME, Bakke A, Merkens LS, Bennett RM, Hefeneider SH. Quantification of DNA binding to cell-surfaces by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 2000;241:141-146.
16. Chatelier RC, Ashcroft RG, Lloyd CJ, Nice EC, Whitehead RC, Sawyer WH, Burgess AW. Binding of fluoresceinatcd epidermal growth factor to A431 cell sub-populations studied using a model-independent analysis of flow cytometric fluorescence data. EMBO J 1986;5:1181-1186.
17. Stein RA, Wilkinson JC, Guyer CA, Staros JV. An analytical approach to the measurement of equilibrium binding constants: Application to EGF binding to EGF receptors in intact cells measured by flow cytometry. Biochemistry 2001;40:6142-6154.
18. Wang L, Gaigalas AK, Abbasi F, Marti GE, Vogt RF, Schwartz A. Quantitating fluorescence intensity from fluorophores: Practical use of MESF values. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 2002;107:339-353.
19. Corrie SR, Lawrie GA, Trau M. Quantitative analysis and characterization of biofunctionalized fluorescent silica particles. Langmuir 2006;22:2731-2737.
20. Miller C, Vogel R, Surawski P, Jack K, Corrie S, Trau M. Fabrication of functionalized organosilica microspheres via a novel synthesis route. Langmuir 2005;21:9733-9740.
21. Miller CR, Vogel R, Surawski PT, Corrie SR, Ruhmann A, Trau M. Biomolecular screening with novel organosilica microspheres. Chem Commun 2005;38:4783-4785.
22. Johnston APR, Battersby BJ, Lawrie GA, Trau M. Porous functionalised silica particles: A potential platform for biomolecular screening. Chem Commun 2005:848-850.
23. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 1996;5:299-314.
24. Draghici S Statistical intelligence: Effective analysis of high-density microarray data. Drug Discov Today 2002;7 (Suppl):S55-S63.
25. Draghici S. Data Analysis Tools for DNA Microarrays. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2003.
26. Langmuir I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. II. Liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1917;39:1848-1906.
27. Nacf F, Magnasco MO. Solving the riddle of the bright mismatches: Labelling and effective binding in oligonucleotide arrays. Phys Rev E 2003;68:1-4.
28. Iannone MA, Consler TG. Effect of microsphere binding site density on the apparent affinity of an interaction partner. Cytometry Part A 2006;69A:374-383.
29. Tessema M, Simons PC, Cimino DF, Sanchez L, Waller A, Posner RG, Wandinger-Ness A, Prossnitz ER, Sklar LA. Glutathione-S-transferase-green fluorescent portein fusion protein reveals slow dissociation from high site density beads and measures free GSH. Cytometry Part A 2006;69A:326-334.
30. Goddard G, Martin JC, Naivar M, Goodwin PM, Graves SW, Habbersett R, Nolan JP, Jett JH. Single particle high resolution spectral analysis flow cytometry. Cytometry Part A 2006;69A:842-851.
31. Jacobson JW, Oliver KG, Weiss C, Kettman J. Analysis of individual data from bead-based assays ("bead arrays"). Cytometry Part A 2006;69A:384-390.
32. Szekvolgyi L, Balint BL, Imre L, Goda K, Szabo M, Nagy L, Szabo G. ChIP-on-beads: Flow-cytometric evaluation of chromatin immimoprecipitatiou. Cytometry Part A 2006;69A:1086-1091.
33. Vives-Rego J, Resina O, Comas J, Loren G, Julia O. Statistical analysis and biological interpretation of the flow cytometric heterogeneity observed in bacterial axenic cultures. J Microbiol Methods 2003;53:43-50.
34. Coder DM, Redelman D, Vogt RF. Computing the central location of immunofluorescence distributions: Logarithmic data transformations are not always appropriate. Cytometry (Commun Clin Cytom) 1994;18:75-78.
35. Young IT. Proof without prejudice: Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the analysis of histograms from flow systems and other sources. J Histochem Cytochem 1977;25:935-941.
36. Lampariello F, Aiello A. Complete mathematical modelling method for the analysis of immunofluorescence distributions composed of negative and weakly positive cells. Cytometry 1998;32:241-254.
37. Bowtell DDL. Options available - from start to finish - for obtaining expression data by microarray. Nat Genet 1999;21:25-32.
38. Chuaqui RF, Bonner RF, Best CJM, Gillespie JW, Flaig MJ, Hewitt SM, Phillips JL, Krizman DB, Tangrea MA, Ahram M, Linehan WM, Knezevic V, Emmert-Buck MR. Post-analysis follow-up and validation of microarray experiments. Nat Genet 2002;3 (Suppl):509-514.
39. Lockhart DJ, Winzeler EA. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 2000;405:827-836.
40. Rahmann S, Grafe C. Mean and variance of Gibbs free energy of oligonucleotides in the nearest neighbour model under varying conditions. Bioinformatics 2004;20: 2928-2933.
41. Yilmaz LS, Noguera DR. Mechanistic approach to the problem of hybridization efficiency in fluorescent in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:7126-7139.
42. Koehler RT, Peyret N. Thermodynamic properties of DNA sequences: Characteristic values for the human genome. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3333-3339.