ChIP-on-beads: Flow-cytometric evaluation of chromatin immunoprecipitation

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 69, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1086-1091

  Székvölgyi, Lóránt ^a   Bálint, Bálint L ^a   Imre, László ^a,b   Goda, Katalin ^a   Szabó, Miklós ^b   Nagy, László ^a   Szabó, Gábor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^b Institute of Isotopes   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Chromatin immunoprecipitation; Flow cytometry

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; HISTONE H4; LYSINE; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN GLUTAMINE GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE;

ACETYLATION; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIGENETICS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TGM2 GENE;

ACETYLATION; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DOWN-REGULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HISTONES; METHYLATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; RNA, MESSENGER; TRANSGLUTAMINASES;

EID: 33750011602     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20325     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Schreiber SL, Bernstein BE. Signaling network model of chromatin. Cell 2002;111:771-778.
2. Lachner M, O'Sullivan RJ, Jenuwein T. An epigenetic road map for histone lysine methylation. J Cell Sci 2003;116:2117-2124.
3. Downs JA, Jackson SP. Cancer: Protective packaging for DNA. Nature 2003;424:732-734.
4. Hake SB, Xiao A, Allis CD. Linking the epigenetic 'language' of covalent histone modifications to cancer. Br J Cancer 2004;90:761-769.
5. Seligson DB, Horvath S, Shi T, et al. Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Nature 2005;435:1262-1266.
6. Das PM, Ramachandran K, vanWert J, Singal R. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Biotechniques 2004;37:961-969.
7. Spencer VA, Sun JM, Li L, Davie JR. Chromatin immunoprecipitation: A tool for studying histone acetylation and transcription factor binding. Methods 2003;31:67-75.
8. Kuo MH, Allis CD. In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic protein: DNA associations in a chromatin environment. Methods 1999;19:425-433.
9. Dolken L, Schuler F, Dolken G. Quantitative detection of t(14;18)positive cells by real-time quantitative PCR using fluorogenic probes. Biotechniques 1998;25:1058-1064.
10. Spiro A, Lowe M. Quantitation of DNA sequences in environmental PCR products by a multiplexed, bead-based method. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:1010-1013.
11. Taylor JD, Briley D, Nguyen Q, et al. Flow cytometric platform for high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Biotechniques 2001;30:661-669.
12. Pataki J, Szabo M, Lantos E. et al. Biological microbeads for flow-cytometric immunoassays, enzyme titrations, and quantitative PCR. Cytometry A 2005;68:45-52.
13. Balint BL, Szanto A, Madi A, et al. Arginine methylation provides epigenetic transcription memory for retinoid-induced differentiation in myeloid cells. Mol Cell Biol 2005;25:5648-5663.
14. Davies PJ, Murtaugh MP, Moore WT Jr, Johnson GS, Lucas D. Retinoic acid-induced expression of tissue transglutaminase in human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells. J Biol Chem 1985;260:5166-5174.
15. Lu S, Saydak M, Gentile V, Stein JR Davies PJA. Isolation and characterization of the human tissue transglutaminase gene promoter. J Biol Chem 1995;270:9748-9756.
16. Nagy L, Saydak M, Shipley N, et al. Identification and characterization of a versatile retinoid response element (retinoic acid receptor response element-retinoid X receptor response element) in the mouse tissue transglutaminase gene promoter. J Biol Chem 1996;271:4355-4365.
17. Rutledge RG, Cote C. Mathematics of quantitative kinetic PCR and the application of standard curves. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;31:e93.
18. Khobta A, Carlo-Stella C, Capranico G. Specific histone patterns and acetylase/deacetylase activity at the breakpoint-cluster region of the human MLL gene. Cancer Res 2004;64:2656-2662.