Nine-color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part I: Panel design by an empiric approach

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 400-410

  McLaughlin, Bridget E ^a   Baumgarth, Nicole ^b   Bigos, Martin ^c   Roederer, Mario ^d   De Rosa, Stephen C ^e   Altman, John D ^f   Nixon, Douglas F ^g   Ottinger, Janet ^h   Oxford, Carol ^b   Evans, Thomas G ⁱ   Asmuth, David M ^a,j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GLADSTONE INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Compensation; Fluorochrome conjugated antibody; Polychromatic flow cytometry; T cell immunophenotyping

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY CONJUGATE; CD45RA ANTIGEN; CELL ANTIGEN; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR CCR7; CYTOKINE; FLUORESCEIN ISOTHIOCYANATE; FLUOROCHROME; LYMPHOCYTE SURFACE MARKER;

ACCURACY; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; CELL MATURATION; COLORIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; MONOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; SPECTROSCOPY; T LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; TITRIMETRY;

ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION, T-LYMPHOCYTE; CYTOKINES; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMANS; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STAINING AND LABELING; T-LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS;

EID: 42949147530     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20555     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baumgarth N, Roederer M. A practical approach to multicolor flow cytometry for immunophenotyping. J Immunol Methods 2000;243:77-97.
2. Bigos M, Baumgarth N, Jager GC, Herman OC, Nozaki T, Stovel RT, Parks DR, Herzenberg LA. Nine color eleven parameter immunophenotyping using three laser flow cytometry. Cytometry 1999;36:36-45.
3. Roederer M. Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: Visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. Cytometry 2001;45:194-205.
4. Roederer M, De Rosa SC, Gerstein K, Anderson M, Bigos M, Stovel R, Nozaki T, Parks D, Herzenberg L, Herzenberg L. 8 color, 10-parameter flow cytometry to elucidate complex leukocyte heterogeneity. Cytometry 1997;29:328-339.
5. Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Roederer M. Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: Unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:648-655.
6. Geisler C. TCR trafficking in resting and stimulated T cells. Crit Rev Immunol 2004;24:67-86.
7. Baumgarth N, Bigos M. Optimization of emission optics. Methods in cell biology, Vol. 75, Cytometry: New Developments, 4th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2004. pp 3-22.
8. Parks DR, Roederer M, Moore WA. A new "Logicle" display method avoids deceptive effects of logarithmic scaling for low signals and compensated data. Cytometry Part A 2006;69:541-551.
9. De Rosa SC, Lu FX, Yu J, Perfetto SP, Falloon J, Moser S, Evans TG, Koup R, Miller CJ, Roederer M. Vaccination in humans generates broad T cell cytokine responses. J Immunol 2004;173:5372-5380.
10. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: Intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. Science 2000;290:92-97.
11. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999;401:708-712.
12. Riedy MC, Muirhead KA, Jensen CP, Stewart CC. Use of a photolabeling technique to identify nonviable cells in fixed homologous or heterologous cell populations. Cytometry 1993;12:133-139.
13. Maecker HT, Trotter J. Selecting Reagents for Multicolor Flow Cytometry. Hotlines Platinum Edition 2006. Available at www.bdbiosciences.com/pdfs/ newsletters/23-9059-00.pdf.
14. Maecker HT, Frey T, Nomura LE, Trotter J. Selecting fluorochrome conjugates for maximum sensitivity. Cytometry Part A 2004;62:169-173.
15. Maecker HT, Trotter J. Flow cytometry controls, instrument setup, and the determination of positivity. Cytometry Part A 2006;69:1037-1042.
16. Zuckermann FA. Extrathymic CD4/CD8 double positive T cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1999;72:55-66.
17. Sullivan YB, Landay AL, Zack JA, Kitchen SG, Al-Harthi L. Upregulation of CD4 on CD8+ T cells: CD4dimCD8bright T cells constitute an activated phenotype of CD8+ T cells. Immunology 2001;103:270-280.
18. Parel Y, Chizzolini C. CD4+ CD8+ double positive (DP) T cells in health and disease. Autoimmun Rev 2004;3:215-220.
19. Horton H, Thomas EP, Stucky JA, Frank I, Moodie Z, Huang Y, Chiu YL, McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC. Optimization and validation of an 8-color intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay to quantify antigen-specific T cells induced by vaccination. J Immunol Methods 2007;323:39-54.
20. Precopio ML, Betts MR, Parrino J, Price DA, Gostick F, Ambrozak DR, Asher TE, Douek DC, Harari A, Pantaleo G, Bailer R, Graham BS, Roederer M, Koup RA. Immunization with vaccinia virus induces polyfunctional and phenotypically distinctive CD8(+) T cell responses. J Exp Med 2007;204:1405-1416.
21. Berlier JE, Rothe A, Buller G, Bradford J, Gray DR, Filanoski BJ, Telford WG, Yue S, Liu J, Cheung CY, Chang W, Hirsch JD, Beechem JM, Haugland RP, Haugland RP. Quantitative comparison of long-wavelength Alexa Fluor dyes to Cy dyes: Fluorescence of the dyes and their boiconjugates. J Histochem Cytochem 2003;51:1699-1712.
22. Mahnke YD, Roederer M. Optimizing a multicolor immunophenotyping assay. Clin Lab Med 2007;27:469-485.
23. McLaughlin BE, Baumgarth N, Bigos M, Roederer M, De Rosa SC, Altman JD, Nixon DF, Ottinger J, Li J, Beckett L, Shacklett BL, Evans TG, Asmuth DM. Nine color flow cytometry for accurate measurement of T-cell subsets and cytokine responses. Part II. Panel performance across different instrument platforms. Cytometry A 2008; 73A: in press. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20556 (this issue).