On "Modified constraint-induced therapy... " Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340

Physical Therapy

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 680-684

  Wolf, Steven L ^a,b,c,d  

^a Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine and Medicine

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Atlanta VA Rehab R and D Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PRODUCTIVITY; REIMBURSEMENT;

EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL;

EID: 42949128246     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2008.88.5.680     Document Type: Letter

References (32)

1. Page SJ, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke exhibiting minimal movement ability in the affected arm. Phys Ther. 2007;87:872-878.
2. Page SJ, Levine P, Hill V. Mental practice as a gateway to modified constraint-induced movement therapy: a promising combination to improve function. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:321-327.
3. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A, et al. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.
4. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.
5. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:33-40.
6. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, et al. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:137-152.
7. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189-1194.
8. Brogardh C, Sjolund BH. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:218-227.
9. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, et al. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:401-408.
10. Fritz SL, George SZ, Wolf SL, Light KE. Participant perception of recovery as criterion to establish importance of improvement for constraint-induced movement therapy outcome measures: a preliminary study. Phys Ther. 2007;87:170-178.
11. Lin KC, Wu CY, Wei TH, et al. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:1075-1086.
12. Malcolm MP, Triggs WJ, Light KE, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:707-715.
13. Wu CY, Chen CL, Tsai WC, et al. A randomized controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:273-278.
14. Wu CY, Lin KC, Chen HC, et al. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: a kinematic study of motor control mechanisms. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:460-466.
15. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke. 2005;36:2493-2496.
16. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410-1414.
17. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, et al. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:55-60.
18. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:27-32.
19. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847-853.
20. Lord JP, Hall K. Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:88-91.
21. Patten C, Lexell J, Brown HE. Weakness and strength training in persons with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:293-312.
22. Lum PS, Patten C, Kothari D, Yap R. Effects of velocity on maximal torque production in poststroke hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30:732-742.
23. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:620-628.
24. Winstein CJ, Stewart JC. Conditions of task practice for individuals with neurologic impairments. In: Selzer SC, Cohen LG, Duncan PW, Gage FH, ed. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation. Vol 2. New York, NY: Cambridge Press; 2006:89-102.
25. American Medical Association. Current Procedural Terminology, 2008. Chicago, Ill: AMA; 2008.
26. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
27. US Department of Health and Human Services. HCPCS Coding Questions. 2.22.2006. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ MedHCPCSGenInfo20_HCPCS_Coding_Questions.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed October 4, 2007.
28. Blanton S, Wilsey H, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke rehabilitation: perspectives on future clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23:15-28.
29. Lee G. Performance-based payment: a tentative first step. PT Magazine. 2007;15(6):26-28.
30. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Looking in the rear view mirror when conversing with back seat drivers: the EXCITE trial revisited. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:379-387.
31. Page SJ, Wu C, Lin K. Letter to the editor. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:574-575.
32. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D, et al. The EXCITE Trial: relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the Wolf Motor Function Test. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:549-562.