Nonadiabatic effects in the dynamics of atoms confined in a cylindric time-orbiting-potential magnetic trap

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 5 B, 2004, Pages

  Franzosi, Roberto ^a   Zambon, Bruno ^a   Arimondo, Ennio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; HAMILTONIANS; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC MOMENTS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ATOMIC MOTION; BERRY PHASE; MAGNETIC TRAPS; TIME-ORBITING POTENTIAL (TOP);

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 42749100430     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.053603     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. For an introduction see the supplement in J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1994). For a review see A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989). For a list of experiments on Berry's phase see J. Anandan, J. Christiam, and K. Wakelik, Am. J. Phys. 65, 180 (1997).
2. For an introduction see the supplement in J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1994). For a review see A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989). For a list of experiments on Berry's phase see J. Anandan, J. Christiam, and K. Wakelik, Am. J. Phys. 65, 180 (1997).
3. For an introduction see the supplement in J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1994). For a review see A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989). For a list of experiments on Berry's phase see J. Anandan, J. Christiam, and K. Wakelik, Am. J. Phys. 65, 180 (1997).
4. An early study of the nonadiabatic processes for the atomic motion within an inhomogeneous magnetic field was made by E. Majorana, Nuovo Cimento 9, 44 (1932).
5. Y. Aharonov and A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3593 (1992).
6. An additional velocity-dependent potential is derived in R. G. Littlejohn and S. Weigert, Phys. Rev. A 48, 924 (1993).
7. C.-P. Sun, M.-L. Ge, and Q. Xiao, Commun. Theor. Phys. 13, 63 (1990); C.-P. Sun and M.-L. Ge, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1349 (1990).
8. C.-P. Sun, M.-L. Ge, and Q. Xiao, Commun. Theor. Phys. 13, 63 (1990); C.-P. Sun and M.-L. Ge, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1349 (1990).
9. T.-L. Ho and V. B. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2595 (1996).
10. C. V. Sukumar and D. M. Brink, Phys. Rev. A 56, 2451 (1997).
11. E. A. Hinds and C. Eberlein, Phys. Rev. A 61, 033614 (2000).
12. R. M. Potvliege and V. Zehnlé, Phys. Rev. A 63, 025601 (2001).
13. V. I. Yukalov, Phys. Rev. A 56, 5004 (1997).
14. J. Schmiedmayer and A. Scrinzi, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 693 (1996); J. R. Anglin and J. Schmiedmayer, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022111 (2004).
15. J. Schmiedmayer and A. Scrinzi, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 693 (1996); J. R. Anglin and J. Schmiedmayer, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022111 (2004).
16. J. H. Müller, O. Morsch, D. Ciampini, M. Anderlini, R. Mannella, and E. Arimondo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4454 (2000).
17. J. H. Müller, O. Morsch, D. Ciampini, M. Anderlini, R. Mannella, and E. Arimondo, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t.2 IV, 649 (2001).
18. R. Geursen, N. R. Thomas, and A. C. Wilson, Phys. Rev. A 68, 043611 (2003).
19. W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867 (1990); T. Fukui and Y. Tsue, Prog. Theor. Phys. 87, 627 (1992); A. Montorsi and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8226 (1997).
20. W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867 (1990); T. Fukui and Y. Tsue, Prog. Theor. Phys. 87, 627 (1992); A. Montorsi and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8226 (1997).
21. W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867 (1990); T. Fukui and Y. Tsue, Prog. Theor. Phys. 87, 627 (1992); A. Montorsi and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8226 (1997).
22. K. J. Challis, R. J. Ballagh, and C. W. Gardiner, e-print; condmat/0406497.
23. W. Petrich, M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3352 (1995).
24. M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995).
25. E. W. Hagley, L. Deng, M. Kozuma, J, Wen, K. Helmerson, S. L. Rolston, and W. D. Phillips, Science 283, 1706 (1999).
26. D. J. Han, R. H. Wynar, Ph. Courteille, and D. J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. A 57, R4114 (1998).
27. B. P. Anderson and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A 59, R938 (1999).
28. J. L. Martin, C. R. McKenzie, N. R. Thomas, J. C. Sharpe, D. M. Warrington, P. J. Manson, W. J. Sandle, and A. C. Wilson, J. Phys. B 32, 3065 (1999).
29. J. Arlt, O. Maragó, E. Hodby, S. A. Hopkins, G. Hechenblaikner, S. Webster, and C. J. Foot, J. Phys. B 32, 5861 (1999).
30. 0 field rotating in the horizontal plane [25].
31. J. H. Müller, D. Ciampini, O. Morsch, G. Smirne, M. Fazzi, P. Verkerk, F. Fuso, and E. Arimondo, J. Phys. B 33, 4095 (2000).
32. V. G. Minogin, J. A. Richmond, and G. I. Opat, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3138 (1998).
33. S. Gov and S. Shtrikman, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 2250 (1999).
34. D. S. Hall, J. R. Ensher, D. S. Jin, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Proc. SPIE 3270, 98 (1998).
35. The factorization of the wave function has been discussed in [10].
36. M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 452, 1207-1220 (1996).
37. R. J. Cook, D. G. Shankland, and A. L. Wells, Phys. Rev. A 31, 564 (1985).
38. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1995).
39. Since the center-of-mass motion is described by a threedimensional harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian, the centerof-mass wave function is given at all times by a Glauber coherent state |α) representing the minimum indetermination state [32]. It is easy matter to verify that (α|(xp+px)/2|α) =(α|x|α)(α|p|α). Therefore the factorization applies to those states.