Modification of the posterior cruciate ligament tension following total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of the Genesis CR and LCS meniscal bearing prostheses

Knee

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 203-208

  Siebel, Thomas ^a   Käfer, Wolfram ^b  

^a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanical study; Ligament tension; Posterior cruciate ligament; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; FORCE TRANSDUCER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT PRESSURE; KINEMATICS; KNEE; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MENISCI, TIBIAL; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 2942541599     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2003.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Del Valle M.E., Harwin S.F., Maestro A., Murcia A., Vega J.A. Immunohistochemical analysis of mechanoreceptors in the human posterior cruciate ligament: a demonstration of its proprioceptive role and clinical relevance. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;916-922
2. Emodi G.J., Callaghan J.J., Pedersen D.R., Brown T.D. PCL function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation. Iowa Orthop J. 19:1999;82-92
3. Laskin R.S. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. The Knee. 2:1995;139-144
4. Müller W. Das Knie. Form, Funktion und ligamentäre Wiederherstellungschirurgie. 1982;Springer, Berlin
5. Menschik A. Mechanik des Kniegelenkes. I Teil Z Orthop. 112:1974;481-495
6. Bolanos A.A., Colizza W.A., McCann P.D., Gotlin R.S., Wootten M.E., Kahn B.A., et al. A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;906-915
7. Dorr L.D., Ochsner J.L., Gronley J., Perry J. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retained versus cruciate-sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 236:1988;36-43
8. Shoji H., Wolf A., Packard S., Yoshino S. Cruciate retained and excised total knee arthroplasty. A comparative study in patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 305:1994;218-222
9. Arima J., Whiteside L.A., Martin J.W., Miura H., White S.E., McCarthy D.S. Effect of partial release of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 353:1998;194-202
10. Sorger J.I., Federle D., Kirk P.G., Grood E., Cochran J., Levy M. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 12:1997;869-879
11. Lewandowski P.J., Askew M.J., Lin D.F., Hurst F.W., Melby A. Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -sacrificing mobile bearing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 12:1997;777-784
12. Incavo S.J., Johnson C.C., Beynnon B.D., Howe J.G. Posterior cruciate ligament strain biomechanics in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 309:1994;88-93
13. Singerman R., Dean J.C., Pagan H.D., Goldberg V.M. Decreased posterior tibial slope increases strain in the posterior cruciate ligament following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 11:1996;99-103
14. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., Walker S.A., Dennis K.N. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;748-752
15. Lattanzio P.J., Chess D.G., MacDermid J.C. Effect of the posterior cruciate ligament in knee-joint proprioception in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;580-585
16. Simmons S., Lephart S., Rubash H., Borsa P., Barrack R.L. Proprioception following total knee arthroplasty with and without the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty. 11:1996;763-768
17. Xu W.S., Butler D.L., Stouffer D.C., Grood E.S., Glos D.L. Theoretical analysis of an implantable force transducer for tendon and ligament structures. J Biomech Eng. 114:1992;170-177
18. Glos D.L., Butler D.L., Grood E.S., Levy M.S. In vitro evaluation of an implantable force transducer (IFT) in a patellar tendon model. J Biomech Eng. 115:1993;335-343
19. Griffin F.M., Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 15:2000;970-973
20. Hüsler J., Zimmermann H. Statistische Prinzipien für medizinische Projekte. 1996;Huber, Bern
21. Imran A., O'Connor J.J. Theoretical estimates of cruciate ligament forces: effects of tibial surface geometry and ligament orientations. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 211:1997;425-439
22. Wilson D.R., Feikes J.D., O'Connor J.J. Ligaments and articular contact guide passive knee flexion. J Biomech. 31:1998;1127-1136
23. Kleinbart F.A., Bryk E., Evangelista J., Scott W.N., Vigorita V.J. Histologic comparison of posterior cruciate ligaments from arthritic and age-matched knee specimens. J Arthroplasty. 11:1996;726-731
24. Carlin G.J., Livesay G.A., Harner C.D., Ishibashi Y., Kim H.S., Woo S.L. In-situ forces in the human posterior cruciate ligament in response to posterior tibial loading. Ann Biomech Eng. 24:1996;193-197
25. Fox R.J., Harner C.D., Sakane M., Carlin G.J., Woo S.L. Determination of the in situ forces in the human posterior cruciate ligament using robotic technology. A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 26:1998;395-401
26. Tsakonas A.C., Polyzoides A.J. Reduction of polyethylene in a congruent meniscal knee prosthesis. Experimental and clinical studies. Acta Orthop Scand. 275:(Suppl):1997;127-131
27. O'Connor J.J., Goodfellow J.W. Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 210:1996;217-222
28. Sathasivam S., Walker P.S. The conflicting requirements of laxity and conformity in total knee replacement. J Biomech. 32:1999;239-247