Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning

Journal of Applied Logic

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 135-151

  Atkinson, Katie ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AATS; Argumentation; Audiences; Moral principles; Practical reasoning; Values

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ARGUMENTATION; AUDIENCES; MORAL PRINCIPLES; MORAL REASONING; PRACTICAL REASONING; VALUES;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 42649130671     PISSN: 15708683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alur R., Henzinger T.A., and Kupferman O. Alternating-time temporal logic. ACM Journal 49 5 (2002) 672-713
2. Amgoud L., and Kaci S. On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation. In: Rahwan I., Moraitis P., and Reed C. (Eds). Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence vol. 3366 (2004), Springer 192-207
3. K. Atkinson, What should we do?: Computational representation of persuasive argument in practical reasoning, PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2005
4. Atkinson K., and Bench-Capon T. Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning. In: Goble L., and Meyer J.Ch. (Eds). Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence vol. 4048 (2006), Springer 8-23
5. Atkinson K., and Bench-Capon T. Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action. Proceedings of the Twenty Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007) (2007), AAAI Press 24-29
6. Atkinson K., and Bench-Capon T. Argumentation and standards of proof. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL 2007) (2007), ACM Press 107-116
7. Atkinson K., Bench-Capon T., and McBurney P. A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument for proposals over action. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11 2 (2005) 153-171
8. Atkinson K., Bench-Capon T., and McBurney P. Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152 2 (2006) 157-206
9. Bench-Capon T. Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 3 (2003) 429-448
10. Chorley A., and Bench-Capon T. Modelling state intervention in cases of conflicting interests. In: van Engers T. (Ed). Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2006: The Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications vol. 152 (2006), IOS Press 31-40
11. Chorley A., Bench-Capon T., and McBurney P. Automating argumentation for deliberation in cases of conflict of interest. In: Dunne P.E., and Bench-Capon T.J.M. (Eds). Computational Models of Natural Argument, Proceedings of COMMA 2006. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications vol. 144 (2006), IOS Press 279-290
12. Christie C.G. The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument (2000), Kluwer Academic Press
13. Coleman J. Risks and Wrongs (1992), Cambridge University Press
14. Dung P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357
15. Hansson S.O. The Structure of Values and Norms (2001), Cambridge University Press
16. Hare R.M. Freedom and Reason (1963), The Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
17. McNamara P. Doing well enough: Towards a logic for common sense morality. Studia Logica 57 (1996) 167-192
18. Moses Y., and Tennenholtz M. Artificial social systems. Computers and AI 14 6 (1995) 533-562
19. Urmson J.O. Saints and heroes. In: Melden A.I. (Ed). Essays in Moral Philosophy (1958), University of Washington Press 198-216
20. van der Hoek W., Roberts M., and Wooldridge M. Social laws in alternating time: Effectiveness, feasibility and synthesis. Synthese 156 1 (2007) 1-19
21. Walton D.N. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
22. Wooldridge M., and van der Hoek W. On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract. Journal of Applied Logic 3 (2005) 396-420