Automating Argumentation for Deliberation in Cases of Conflict of Interest

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 144, Issue , 2006, Pages 279-290

  Chorley, Alison ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a   McBurney, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

argument schemes; decision making based on argumentation; Reasoning about action with argument

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENT SCHEME; CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; CRITICAL QUESTIONS; DECISION MAKING BASED ON ARGUMENTATION; DECISIONS MAKINGS; OPERATIONAL INTERPRETATION; REASONING ABOUT ACTION WITH ARGUMENT; REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS;

EID: 84940505866     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. A. J. P. Kenny. Practical Reasoning and Rational Appetite, 1975. Reprinted in [9].
2. D. N. Walton. Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1996.
3. K. Atkinson. What Should We Do: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2005.
4. K. Atkinson and T. Bench-Capon. Addressing Moral Problems Through Practical Reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Eighth InternationalWorkshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2006). To appear.
5. M. Wooldridge and W. van der Hoek. On Obligations and Normative Ability: Towards a Logical Analysis of the Social Contract. In Journal of Applied Logic, 3:396-420, 2005.
6. J. Coleman. Risks and Wrongs. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
7. C. G. Christie. The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument. Kluwer Academic, 2000.
8. L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, M. Lagasquie-Schiex. On the Bipolarity in Argumentation Frameworks. NMR 2004: 1-9.
9. J. Raz, editor. Practical Reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1978