On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3366, Issue , 2005, Pages 192-207

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Kaci, Souhila ^b  

^a IRIT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Negotiation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ARGUMENTATION; NEGOTIATION;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 26844440445     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. L. Amgoud. A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, ECSQARU'2003, pages 552-563, 2003.
2. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and N. Maudet. Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'00), pages 338-342, 2000.
3. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, S. Kaci, and H. Prade. Bipolar representation and fusion of preferences in the possibilistic logic framework. In Proceedings of the eighth International Confenrence on Principle of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'02), pages 158-169, 2002.
4. J. Borod. The neuropsychology of emotion. Oxford University Press, 2000.
5. J. Cacioppo and G. Bernston. The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 5:133-137, 1999.
6. J. Cacioppo, W. Gardner, and G. Bernston. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 1:3-25, 1997.
7. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
8. S. Kaci and H. Prade. Bipolar goals. A possibilistic logic characterization of preferred choices. In Proceedings of Workshop on Local Computation for Logics and Uncertainty, in conjunction with ECAI'04, 2004.
9. S. Kraus, K. Sycara, and A. Evenchik. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation, volume 104. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1998.
10. X. Luo, N. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, H. fung Leung, and J. H. man Lee. A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. In Artificial Intelligence, 148(1-2), pages 53-102, 2003.
11. I. Rahwan, L. Sonenberg, and F. Dignum. Towards interest-based negotiation. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'03), pages 773-780, 2003.
12. E. Rolls. Precis of "brain and emotion". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(2):177-234, 2000.
13. C. Sierra, N. Jennings, P. Noriega, and S. Parsons. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In Proceedings of the fourth Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL'97), pages 167-182, 1997.
14. R. Thomason. Desires and defaults: A framework for planning with inferred goals. In Proceedings of the seventh International Confenrence on Principle of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'00), pages 702-713, 2000.
15. O. Wong and R. Lau. Possibilistic reasoning for intelligent payment agents. In Proceedings of the second Workshop on AI in Electronic Commerce AIEC, pages 170-180, 2000.