Effects of interaction design in digital libraries on user interactions

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 438-463

  Zhang, Xiangmin ^a   Li, Yuelin ^a   Liu, Jingjing ^a   Zhang, Ying ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Digital libraries; Information retrieval; User studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 42649090095     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00220410810867623     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bates, M. (2002), "The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface", Information Processing and Management, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 381-400.
2. Bazea-Yates, R. and Riberio-Neto, B. (1999), Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, NY.
3. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Jeng, J., Keller, A., Kelly, D., Kim, J., Lee, H.-J., Tang, M.-C. and Yuan, X.-J. (2002), "Rutgers' TREC 2001 interactive track experience", in Voorhees, E.M. and Harman, D.M. (Eds), The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2001, GPO, Washington, DC, pp. 465-72.
4. Belkin, N.J., Marchetti, P.G. and Cool, C. (1993), "Braque: design of an interface to support user interaction in information retrieval", Information Processing & Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 325-44.
5. Bodner, R.C., Chignell, M.H., Charoenkitkarn, N., Golovchinsky, G. and Kopak, R.W. (2001), "The impact of text browsing on text retrieval performance", Information Processing & Management, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 507-20.
6. Chang, S.L. (1995), "Toward a multidimensional framework for understanding browsing", unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
7. Chang, S.L. and Rice, R.E. (1993), "Browsing: a multidimensional framework", in Williams, M.E. (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 28, Learned Information, Medford, NJ, pp. 231-76.
8. Chen, S.Y., Magoulas, G.D. and Dimakopoulos, D. (2005), "A flexible interface design for web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 70-83.
9. Chimera, R. and Shneiderman, B. (1994), "An exploratory evaluation of three interfaces for browsing large hierarchical tables of contents", ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 383-406.
10. Dakka, W., Ipeirotis, P.G. and Wood, K.R. (2005), "Automatic construction of multifaceted browsing interfaces", in Chowdhury, A., Fuhr, N., Ronthaler, M., Schek, H.-J. and Teiken, W. (Eds), Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management CIKM '05, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 768-75.
11. Egan, D.E., Remde, J.R. and Landauer, T.K. (1989), "Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser", in Bice, K. and Lewis, C. (Eds), Proceedings of CHI'89 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 89, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 205-10.
12. Hartson, H.R., Shivakumar, P. and Perez-Quinones, M.A. (2004), "Usability inspection of digital libraries: a case study", International Journal of Digital Library, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 108-23.
13. Hearst, M. (1999), "User interfaces and visualization", in Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B. (Eds), Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 257-323.
14. Hearst, M., Elliot, A., English, J., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K. and Yee, K.P. (2002), "Finding the flow in website search", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45 No. 9, pp. 42-9.
15. Herner, S. (1970), "Browsing", in Kent, A. and Lancour, H. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 3, Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 408-15.
16. Hertzum, M. and Frøkjær, E. (1996), "Browsing and querying in online documentation: a study of user interfaces and the interaction process", ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 136-61.
17. Hill, L.L., Carver, L., Larsgaard, M., Dolin, R., Smith, T.R., Frew, J. and Rae, M.-A. (2000), "Alexandria Digital Library: user evaluation studies and system design", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 246-59.
18. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W.-M. and Tam, K.-Y. (2001-2002), "Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 97-124.
19. Kengeri, R., Seals, C.D., Harley, H.D., Reddy, H.R. and Fox, E.A. (1999), "Usability study of digital libraries: ACM, IEEE-CS, NCSTRL, NDLTD", International Journal of Digital Library, Vol. 2 Nos 2-3, pp. 157-69.
20. Korfhage, R.R. (1997), Information Storage and Retrieval, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
21. Lesk, M. (2005), Understanding Digital Libraries, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
22. Li, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. and Liu, J. (2006), "Trained vs untrained searchers' interaction with search features in digital libraries", Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Information Today, Medford, NJ.
23. McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R. and Cunningham, S.J. (2004), "Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone", International Journal on Digital Libraries, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 283-97.
24. Marchionini, G. (1995), Information Seeking in Electronic Environments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Marchinonini, G. and Crane, G. (1994), "Evaluating hypermedia and learning: methods and results from the Perseus project", ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 12 1, January, pp. 5-34.
26. Marchionini, G., Norman, K. and Morrell, K. (1992), Final Project Report: Computer Interface Design for Intermediate Results for Grateful Med. Report to the National Library of Medicine, NLM, Bethesda, MD.
27. Paynter, G.W., Witten, I.H., Cunningham, S.J. and Buchanan, G. (2000), "Scalable browsing for large collections: a case study", in Nürnberg, P.J., Hicks, D.L. and Furuta, R. (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 215-23.
28. Rao, R., Pedersen, J.O., Hearst, M.A., Mackinlay, J.D., Card, S.K., Masinter, L., Halvorsen, P.-K. and Robertson, G.G. (1995), "Rich interaction in the digital library", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 29-39.
29. Resnick, M.L. and Vaughan, M.W. (2006), "Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces", Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, Vol. 57 No. 6, pp. 781-7.
30. Saracevic, T. (2000), "Digital library evaluation: towards an evolution of concepts", Library Trends, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 350-69.
31. Shiri, A. and Molberg, K. (2005), "Interfaces to knowledge organization systems in Canadian digital library collections", Online information Review, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 604-20.
32. Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D. and Croft, B. (1997), "Clarifying search: a user-interface framework for text searches", D-Lib Magazine, January, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/january97/retrieval/01shneiderman.html (accessed January 20, 2006).
33. Theng, Y.L. (1999), "'Lostness' and digital libraries. Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on digital libraries", available at: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/320000/313433/p250-theng.pdf?key1= 313433&key2=9075758311&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID= 67065601&CFTOKEN=259003 (accessed January 20, 2006).
34. Thong, J.Y.L., Hong, W. and Tam, K.-Y. (2002), "Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 215-42.
35. Yee, K.P., Swearingen, K., Li, K. and Hearst, M. (2003), "Searching and organizing: faceted metadata for image search and browsing", in Cockton, G. and Korhonen, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 401-8.
36. Zhang, J. and Marchionini, G. (2005), "User interfaces for integrating web-based information: evaluation and evolution of a browse and search interface: relation browser", Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 179-88.