The impact of text browsing on text retrieval performance

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 507-520

  Bodner, Richard C ^a   Chignell, Mark H ^a   Charoenkitkarn, Nipon ^b   Golovchinsky, Gene ^c   Kopak, Richard W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

^c FX PALO ALTO LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; PRECISION ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

TEXT BROWSING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035342495     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00059-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bates, M. J. (1990). Where should the person stop and information search interface start?. Information Processing and Management, 26(5), 575-591.
2. Belkin, N. J. (1995). Design principles for electronic textual resources: investigating users and uses of scholarly information. In A. Zampolli, N. Calzolari, & M. Palmer, Current issues in computational linguistics in honor of Don Walker (pp. 479-488). Pisa: Giardini Editori.
3. Belkin, N. J., Chang, S., Downs, T., Saracevic, T., & Zhao, S. (1990). Taking into account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs. In D. Hendersen, Proceedings of ASIS'90, the 53rd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 69-79).
4. Bodner, R. C., & Chignell, M. H. (1999). ClickIR: text retrieval using a dynamic hypertext interface. In E. M. Voorhees, & D. K. Harman, Proceedings of TREC-7, the seventh text retrieval conference (pp. 573-582). Gaithersburg, Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
5. Bodner, R., Chignell, M., & Tam, J. (1997). Website authoring using dynamic hypertext. Proceedings of Webnet'97 (pp. 59-64).
6. Borgman, C. L. (1989). All users of information systems are not created equal: an exploration into individual differences. Information Processing and Management, 25(3), 237-252.
7. Chang, S. L. (1995). Toward a multidimensional framework for understanding browsing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
8. Chang, S., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Browsing: a multidimensional framework. In M. E. Williams, Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 28, pp. 231-276). Medford, NJ: Learned Information Inc.
9. Charoenkitkarn, N. (1996). The effect of markup-querying on search pattern and performance in large-scale text retrieval. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
10. Charoenkitkarn, N., Chignell, M. H., & Golovchinsky, G. (1995). Interactive exploration as a formal text retrieval method: how well can interactivity compensate for unsophisticated retrieval algorithms? In D. K. Harman, Proceedings of TREC-3, the third text retrieval conference (pp. 179-199). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
11. Charoenkitkarn, N., Chignell, M. H., & Golovchinsky, G. (1996). Is recall relevant? An analysis of how user interface conditions affect strategies and performance in large scale text retrieval. In D. K. Harman, Proceedings of TREC-4, the fourth text retrieval conference (pp. 211-232). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
12. Fenichel, C. H. (1981). Online searching: measures that discriminate among users with different types of experience. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(1), 23-32.
13. Fidel, R., & Crandall, M. (1997). Users' perception of the performance of a filtering system. Proceedings of SIGIR'97, the 22nd annual international ACM-SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 198-205).
14. Golovchinsky, G. (1997a). Queries? Links? Is there a difference? Proceedings of ACM CHI'97, the conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 407-414).
15. Golovchinsky, G. (1997b). What the query told the link: The integration of hypertext and information retrieval. Proceedings of hypertext'97, the seventh ACM conference on hypertext (pp. 67-74).
16. Golovchinsky, G., & Chignell, M. H. (1993). Queries-R-Links: graphical markup for text navigation. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93 (pp. 454-460).
17. Golovchinsky, G., & Chignell, M. H. (1997). The newspaper as an information exploration metaphor. Information Processing and Management, 33(5), 663-683.
18. Golovchinsky, G., Chignell, M. H., & Charoenkitkarn, N. (1997). Formal experiments in causal attire: case studies in information exploration. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 3, 123-158.
19. Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (1990). Evaluating the impact of an online library catalogue on subject searching behaviour at the catalogue and at the shelves. Journal of Documentation, 46, 318-338.
20. Iivonen, M. (1995). Searchers and searchers: differences between the most and least consistent searchers. Proceedings of SIGIR'95, the 18th annual international ACM-SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 149-157).
21. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Mick, C. K. (1980). Human factors in information work. In A. R. Benefeld, & E. J. Kazlauskas, Proceedings of ASIS'80, the 43rd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 21-23).
23. Saracevic, T. (1991). Individual differences in organizing, searching and retrieving information. In J. Griffiths, Proceeding of ASIS'91, the 54th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 82-86).
24. Waterworth, J. A., & Chignell, M. H. (1991). A model for information exploration. Hypermedia, 3(1), 35-58.
25. Wright, P. (1991). Cognitive overheads and prostheses. Proceedings of hypertext '91, the third ACM conference on hypertext (pp. 1-12).