Implementing CRA with secondary students with learning disabilities in mathematics

Intervention in School and Clinic

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 270-276

  Witzel, Bradley S ^a   Riccomini, Paul J ^b   Schneider, Elke ^a  

^a WINTHROP UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning disabilities; Mathematics disabilities; Mathematics instruction; Strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 42549171986     PISSN: 10534512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1053451208314734     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adams, T.L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56, 786-795.
2. Bost, L., & Riccomini, P.J. (2006). Effective instruction: An inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention. Remedial and Special Education, 27 (5). 301-311.
3. Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk. Learning to use language. London: Oxford University Press.
4. Cass, M., Cates, D., Smith, M., & Jackson, C. (2003). Effects of manipulative instruction on solving area and perimeter problems by students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 112-120.
5. Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). SmartBrief. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from http://www.cec.sped.org.
6. Demby, A. (1997). Algebraic procedures used by 13-to-15 year olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 45-70.
7. Deno, S.L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 184-192.
8. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H.D. (1990). Memory for action events: A new field of research. Psychological Research, 51, 153-157.
9. Jordan, L., Miller, M.D., & Mercer, C.D. (1998). The effects of concrete to semiconcrete to abstract instruction in the acquisition and retention of fraction concepts and skills. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9 (3). 115-122.
10. Larkin, M.J. (2001). Providing support for student independence through scaffolded instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24 (1). 30-34.
11. Maccini, P., & Hughes, C.A. (2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15 (1). 10-21.
12. Maccini, P., & Ruhl, K.L. (2000). Effects of a graduated instructional sequence on algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 465-489.
13. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction. Columbus, OH: Merrill / Prentice Hall.
14. Miller, S.P., & Mercer, C.D. (1993). Using data to learn about concrete-semiconcrete-abstract instruction for students with math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 89-96.
15. Moses, R., & Cobb, C. (2001). Organizing algebra: The need to voice a demand. Social Policy, 4, 4-12.
16. Nilsson, L.G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137-148). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Noice, H., & Noice, T. (2001). Learning dialogue with and without movement. Memory and Cognition, 29, 820-828.
18. Oberer, J.J. (2003). Effects of learning-style teaching on elementary students' behaviors, achievement, and attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7, 193-200.
19. Peterson, S.K., Mercer, C.D., & O' Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 52-56.
20. Stein, M., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (2006). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (4 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
21. Witzel, B.S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3 (2). 53-64.
22. Witzel, B.S., Mercer, C.D., & Miller, M.D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 121-131.