Significance analysis of microarray for relative quantitation of LC/MS data in proteomics

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Roxas, Bryan A P ^a   Li, Qingbo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSIONS; FALSE POSITIVE AND FALSE NEGATIVES; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY; MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS; NANO LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS; SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS OF MICROARRAYS;

BACTERIA; CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PEPTIDES; TESTING;

CELL CULTURE;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FOURIER TRANSFORM MASS SPECTROMETRY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; DNA MICROARRAY; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PEPTIDE MAPPING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PROTEOME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;

EID: 42549103254     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-187     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hendrickson EL Xia Q Wang T Leigh JA Hackett M Comparison of spectral counting and metabolic stable isotope labeling for use with quantitative microbial proteomics Analyst 2006, 131(12):1335-1341. 10.1039/b610957h 17124542
2. Xia Q: Hendrickson EL Zhang Y Wang T Taub F Moore BC Porat I Whitman WB Hackett M Leigh JA Quantitative proteomics of the archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis validated by microarray analysis and real time PCR Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5(5):868-881. 10.1074/mcp.M500369-MCP200 16489187
3. Park Y Downing SR Kim D Hahn WC Li C Kantoff PW Wei LJ Simultaneous and exact interval estimates for the contrast of two groups based on an extremely high dimensional variable: Application to mass spec data Bioinformatics 2007, 23(12):1451-1458. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm130 17459967
4. Cho SH Goodlett D Franzblau S ICAT-based comparative proteomic analysis of non-replicating persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2006, 86(6):445-460. 10.1016/j.tube.2005.10.002 16376151
5. Li L Li Q Rohlin L Kim U Salmon K Rejtar T Gunsalus RP Karger BL Ferry JG Quantitative proteomic and microarray analysis of the archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans grown with acetate versus methanol J Proteome Res 2007, 6(2):759-771. 10.1021/pr060383l 17269732
6. Molina H Parmigiani G Pandey A Assessing reproducibility of a protein dynamics study using in vivo labeling and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry Anal Chem 2005, 77(9):2739-2744. 10.1021/ac048204b 15859588
7. Piening BD Wang P Bangur CS Whiteaker J Zhang H Feng LC Keane JF Eng JK Tang H Prakash A McIntosh MW Paulovich A Quality control metrics for LC-MS feature detection tools demonstrated on Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteomic profiles J Proteome Res 2006, 5(7):1527-1534. 10.1021/ pr050436j 16823959
8. Meng F Wiener MC Sachs JR Burns C Verma P Paweletz CP Mazur MT Deyanova EG Yates NA Hendrickson RC Quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures using FTMS and differential mass spectrometry J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2007, 18(2):226-233. 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.09.014 17070068
9. Andreev VP Li L Cao L Gu Y Rejtar T Wu SL Karger BL A new algorithm using cross-assignment for label-free quantitation with LC-LTQ-FT MS J Proteome Res 2007, 6(6):2186-2194. 10.1021/pr0606880 17441747
10. Andreev VP Li L Rejtar T Li Q Ferry JG Karger BL New algorithm for 15N/ 14N quantitation with LC-ESI-MS using an LTQ-FT mass spectrometer J Proteome Res 2006, 5(8):2039-2045. 10.1021/pr060105m 16889428
11. Kim YJ Zhan P Feild B Ruben SM He T Reproducibility assessment of relative quantitation strategies for LC-MS based proteomics Anal Chem 2007, 79(15):5651-5658. 10.1021/ac070200u 17580949
12. Listgarten J Emili A Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4(4):419-434. 10.1074/ mcp.R500005-MCP200 15741312
13. Veenstra TD Global and targeted quantitative proteomics for biomarker discovery J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007, 847(1):3-11. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.004 17023222
14. Wang G Wu WW Zeng W Chou CL Shen RF Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: Reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes J Proteome Res 2006, 5(5):1214-1223. 10.1021/pr050406g 16674111
15. Tusher VG Tibshirani R Chu G Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98(9):5116-5121. 33173 11309499 10.1073/pnas.091062498
16. de Godoy LM Olsen JV de Souza GA Li G Mortensen P Mann M Status of complete proteome analysis by mass spectrometry: SILAC labeled yeast as a model system Genome Biol 2006 7(6):R50. 1779535 16784548 10.1186/ gb-2006-7-6-r50
17. Storey JD The positive discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value The Annuals of statistics 2003, 31(6):2013-2035. 10.1214/aos/ 1074290335
18. Liu H Sadygov RG Yates JR 3rd A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics Anal Chem 2004, 76(14):4193-4201. 10.1021/ac0498563 15253663
19. Callister SJ Dominguez MA Nicora CD Zeng X Tavano CL Kaplan S Donohue TJ Smith RD Lipton MS Application of the accurate mass and time tag approach to the proteome analysis of sub-cellular fractions obtained from Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. Aerobic and photosynthetic cell cultures J Proteome Res 2006, 5(8):1940-1947. 10.1021/pr060050o 16889416
20. Wu CC MacCoss MJ Howell KE Matthews DE Yates JR 3rd Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis Anal Chem 2004, 76(17):4951-4959. 10.1021/ac049208j 15373428
21. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/ http://www-stat.stanford.edu/ ~tibs/SAM/ http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/
22. Pinto R Harrison JS Hsu T Jacobs WR Jr. Leyh TS Sulfite reduction in mycobacteria J Bacteriol 2007, 189(18):6714-6722. 2045171 17644602 10.1128/JB.00487-07
23. Fisher MA Plikaytis BB Shinnick TM Microarray analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptional response to the acidic conditions found in phagosomes J Bacteriol 2002, 184(14):4025-4032. 135184 12081975 10.1128/JB.184.14.4025-4032.2002
24. Leaphart AB Thompson DK Huang K Alm E Wan XF Arkin A Brown SD Wu L Yan T Liu X Wickham GS Zhou J Transcriptome profiling of Shewanella oneidensis gene expression following exposure to acidic and alkaline pH J Bacteriol 2006, 188(4):1633-1642. 1367224 16452448 10.1128/JB.188.4.1633-1642.2006
25. Matsuno K Miyamoto T Yamaguchi K Abu Sayed M Kajiwara T Hatano S Identification of DNA-binding proteins changed after induction of sporulation in Bacillus cereus Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1995, 59(2):231-235. 7766022
26. Yohannes E Barnhart DM Slonczewski JL pH-dependent catabolic protein expression during anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli K-12 J Bacteriol 2004, 186(1):192-199. 303440 14679238 10.1128/JB.186.1.192-199.2004
27. Trivedi OA Arora P Sridharan V Tickoo R Mohanty D Gokhale RS Enzymic activation and transfer of fatty acids as acyl-adenylates in mycobacteria Nature 2004, 428(6981):441-445. 10.1038/nature02384 15042094
28. Wheeler PR Ratledge C Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, Protection, and Control Washington DC, Am. Soc. Microbiol. Bloom BR 1994:353-385.
29. Chandu D Nandi D PepN is the major aminopeptidase in Escherichia coli: insights on substrate specificity and role during sodium-salicylate-induced stress Microbiology 2003, 149(Pt 12):3437-3447. 10.1099/mic.0.26518-0 14663077
30. Schnappinger D Ehrt S Voskuil MI Liu Y Mangan JA Monahan IM Dolganov G Efron B Butcher PD Nathan C Schoolnik GK Transcriptional Adaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within Macrophages: Insights into the Phagosomal Environment J Exp Med 2003, 198(5):693-704. 2194186 12953091 10.1084/jem.20030846
31. Jakob K Satorhelyi P Lange C Wendisch VF Silakowski B Scherer S Neuhaus K Gene expression analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum subjected to long-term lactic acid adaptation J Bacteriol 2007, 189(15):5582-5590. 1951826 17526706 10.1128/JB.00082-07
32. Rao PK Roxas BA Li Q Determination of global protein turnover in stressed mycobacterium cells using hybrid-linear ion trap-fourier transform mass spectrometry Anal Chem 2008, 80(2):396-406. 10.1021/ ac701690d 18085750
33. Storey JD Xiao W Leek JT Tompkins RG Davis RW Significance analysis of time course microarray experiments Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(36):12837-12842. 1201697 16141318 10.1073/pnas.0504609102
34. Li Q Li L Rejtar T Lessner DJ Karger BL Ferry JG Electron transport in the pathway of acetate conversion to methane in the marine archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans J Bacteriol 2006, 188(2):702-710. 1347274 16385060 10.1128/JB.188.2.702-710.2006
35. Zhang X Guo Y Song Y Sun W Yu C Zhao X Wang H Jiang H Li Y Qian X Jiang Y He F Proteomic analysis of individual variation in normal livers of human beings using difference gel electrophoresis Proteomics 2006, 6(19):5260-5268. 10.1002/pmic.200600006 16947120