A preliminary study for spatial representiveness of flux observation at ChinaFLUX sites

Science in China, Series D: Earth Sciences

Volumn 49, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages 24-35

  Mi, Na ^a,b   Yu, Guirui ^b   Wang, Panxing ^a   Wen, Xuefa ^b   Sun, Xiaomin ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

ChinaFLUX; Eddy covariance method; Footprint; Source weight function

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY CONTROL; DATA UNCERTAINTY; EDDY COVARIANCE; EDDY COVARIANCE METHOD; FLUX OBSERVATION; OBSERVATION DATA; OBSERVATION POINT; OBSERVATION SYSTEMS; PHYSICAL PROCESS; REFERENCE POINTS; REPRESENTIVENESS; ROUGH SURFACES; SOURCE AREA; THEORETICAL BASIS; WEIGHT FUNCTIONS; WIND DIRECTIONS;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; FUNCTION EVALUATION; SYSTEM STABILITY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

EID: 42449152223     PISSN: 10069313     EISSN: 18622801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-006-8024-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Foken T, Wichura B. Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements. Agri Forest Meteorol, 1996, 78: 83-105.
2. Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, et al. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of European forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecol Res, 2000, 30: 113-175.
3. Baldocchi D, Finnigan J, Wilson K T, et al. On measuring net ecosystem carbon exchange over tall vegetation on complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 2000, 96: 257-291.
4. Baldocchi D. Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9: 479-492.
5. Schmid H P. Experimental design for flux measurements: matching the scales of observations and fluxes. Agri and Forest Meteorol, 1997, 87: 179-200.
6. Göckede M, Corinna R, Foken T. A combination of quality assessment tools for eddy covariance measurements with footprint medelling for the characterization of complex sites. Agri Forest Meteorol, 2004, 127: 175-188.
7. Nappo C J. The workshop on the representativeness of meteorological observation. June 1981, Boulder, CO. Bulletin of America Meteorology Society, 1982, 63: 761-764.
8. Schmid H P, Oke T R. A model to estimate the source area contributing to turbulent exchange in the surface-layer over patchy terrain. Quar J Royal Meteorol Soc, 1990, 116: 965-998.
9. Wilson J D, Swaters G E. The source area influencing a measurement in the planetary boundary-layer: the footprint and the distribution of contact distance. Boundary-layer Meteorol, 1991, 55: 25-46.
10. Horst T W, Weil J C. Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1992, 59: 279-296.
11. Schmid H P. Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1994, 67: 293-318.
12. Kljun N, Kastner-Klein P, Fedorovich E, et al. Evaluation of a Lagrangian footprint model for a wide range of boundary layer stratification. Agri Forest Meteorol, 2004, 127: 189-201.
13. Rannik Ü, Aubinet M, Kurbanmuradov O, et al. Footprint analysis for measurements over a heterogeneous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 2000, 97: 137-166.
14. Kljun N, Rotach M W, Schmid H P. A 3-D backward Lagrangian footprint model for a wide range of boundary layer stratifications. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 2002, 103: 205-226.
15. Schmid H P. Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective. Agri Forest Meteorol, 2002, 113: 159-283.
16. Schuepp P H, Leclerc M Y, Macpherson J I, et al. Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1990, 50: 353-373.
17. Leclerc M Y, Thurtell G W. Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovia analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1990, 52: 247-258.
18. Vesala T, Rannik Ü, Leclerc M. Flux and concentration footprints. Agri Forest Meteorol, 2004, 127: 111-116.
19. Horst T W, Weil J C. How far is far enough-the fetch requirements for micrometeorological measurement of surface fluxes. J Atmos Ocean Tech, 1994, 11: 1018-1025.
20. Haenel H D, Grünhage L. Footprint analysis: a closed analytical solution based on height-dependent profiles of wind speed and eddy viscosity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1999, 93: 395-409.
21. Kormann R, Meixner F X. An analytic footprint model for neutral stratification. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 2001, 99: 207-224.
22. Kutsch W L, Liu C H, Hörmann G, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem carbon fluxes in a broadleaved forest in Northern Germany. Global Change Biol, 2005, 11: 70-88.
23. 2 exchange. Global Change Biol, 2004, 10: 1689-1706.
24. Leclerc M Y, Shen S H, Lamb B. Observation and large-eddy simulation modeling of footprints in the lower convective boundary layer. J Geophy Res-Atm, 1997, 102: 9323-9334.
25. Yu G R, Zhang L M, Sun X M, et al. Advances in carbon flux observation and research in Asia. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48(Supp. I): 1-16.
26. Pasquill F, Smith F B. Atmospheric Diffusion. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1983. 437.
27. Zhao X S, Guan D X, Wu J B, et al. Distribution of footprint and flux source area of the mixed forest of broad-leaved and Korean pine in Changbai Mountain. Journal of Beijing Forest University (in Chinese), 2005, 27(3): 17-23.
28. Zhou Y L, Sun X M, Zhu Z L, et al. Surface roughness length dynamic over several different surfaces and its effects on modeling fluxes. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2006, 49(Supp. II): 262-272.
29. Stull R B. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer: Academic Press, 1988.
30. Gryning S E, Holtslag A A M, Irwin J S, et al. Applied dispersion modeling based on meteorological scaling parameters. Atm Environ, 1987, 21: 79-89.
31. Baldcchi D. Flux footprints within and over forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1997, 85: 273-292.
32. Finn D, Lamb B, Leclerc M Y, et al. Experimental evaluation of analytical and Lagrangian surface-layer footprint model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 1996, 80: 283-308.
33. Sogachev A Y, Rannik Ü, Vesala T. Flux footprints over complex terrain covered by heterogeneous forest. Agri Forest Meteorol, 2004, 127: 143-158.
34. Rebmann C, Göckede M, Foken T, et al. Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modeling. Theor App Climatol, 2005, 80: 121-141.