Research leadership as entrepreneurial organizing for research

Higher Education

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 651-670

  Hansson, Finn ^a   Mønsted, Mette ^a  

^a Department of Management Politics and Philosophy Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Knowledge management; Organizational entrepreneurship; Research leadership; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449148401     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-007-9081-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adler, P. S. & Seok, W. K. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Alvesson, M. (2003a). Methodology for close up studies - struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46, 167-193.
3. Alvesson, M. (2003b). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13-33.
4. Andersen, S. (2005). De gjorde Danmark større. København: Lindhardt og Ringhof.
5. Audétat, M. (2001). Re-thinking science, re-thinking society. Social Studies of Science, 31(6), 950-956.
6. Blau, P. M. (1973). The organization of academic work. London: Transaction Publishers.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1981). The specificity of the scientific field. In C. C. Lemert (Ed.), French sociology. Rupture and renewal since 1968 (pp. 257-292). New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1998) Vom Gebrauch der Wissenschaft. Für eine klinische Soziologie des wissenschaftlichen Feldes. Konstanz: UVK Universitätsverlag.
9. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
10. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
11. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure. Oxford University Press.
12. Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A. S. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475-497.
13. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1998). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Addison-Wesley: Harlow.
14. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities - Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
15. Clark, W. (2006). Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. University of Chicago Press.
16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), 95-120.
17. Connell, H. (2004). University research management. Meeting the institutional challenge. Paris: OECD Publications.
18. DiMaggio, P. J. (1992). Nadel's paradox revisited: Relational and cultural aspects of organizational structure. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, from, and action. (pp. 118-142). Boston: Harvard University Press.
19. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
20. Foss Hansen, H. & Finn, B. (2000). The local construction and entactment of standards for research evaluation. The case of the Copenhagen Business School. Evaluation, 6(3), 281-299.
21. Fuller, S. (2001). Knowledge management foundations. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
22. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S. S. P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
23. Godin, B. (1998). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 465-483.
24. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of the weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
25. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
26. Hjorth, D. (2003). Rewriting entrepreneurship - For a new perspective on organisational creativity. Copenhagen/Malmö/Oslo: CBS Press/Liber/Abstrakt.
27. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32, 1555-1568.
28. Johannisson, B. (1998). Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: Spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship and Regional development, 10, 297-312.
29. Johannisson, B., & Mønsted, M. (1997). Contextualising entrepreneurial networking - The case of Scandinavia. International Studies of Management Organisation, 27(3), 109-136.
30. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
31. Lange, O. (2006). Stormogulen. Gyldendal: Copenhagen.
32. Merton R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure (pp. 156-171). New York: Free Press.
33. Nowotny, H., Gibbons, M., & Scott, P. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press.
34. Rinne, R., & Koivula, J. (2005). The changing place of the university and clash of values. The entrepreneurial university in the European knowledge society. A review of literature. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17, 91-123.
35. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power - and how they hold onto it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 3-21.
36. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
38. Steyaert, C. (2004). The Prosaics of entrepreneurship. In D. Hjorth & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship (pp. 8-21). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
39. Taylor, J. (2006). Managing the unmanageable; the management of research in research-intensive universities. Higher Education Management and Policy, 18, 1-25.
40. Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11-25.
41. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Noisy organizations: Uncertainty, complexity, narrativity. In H. Tsoukas (Ed.), Complex knowledge. Studies in organizational epistemology (pp. 280-296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15, 251-289.
44. Weber, M. (1964/1947). The theory of social and economic organization (Eds. A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons). New York: The Free Press.
45. Weingart, P. (2000). From "finalization" to "Mode 2": Old wine in new bottles? Social Science Information, 36(4), 591-613.
46. West, G. P. (2003). Connecting levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: A focus on information processing, asymmetric knowledge and networks. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjorth (eds.), New movements in entrepreneurship (pp. 51-72). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
47. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.