Theoretical diversity in political communication

Handbook of Political Communication Research

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 3-16

  Rogers, Everett M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449137131     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Cantril, H., Gaudet, H., & Herzog, H. (1940). The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Chaffee, S. H. (1986). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (3rd ed., pp. 62-80). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Chaffee, S. H., & Hockheimer, J. L. (1985). The beginning of political communication research in the United States: Origins of the 'limited effects' model. In E. M. Rogers & F. Balle (Eds.), The media revolution in America and in Western Europe (pp. 267-296). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Collins-Jarvis, L. (1993). Gender representation in an electronic city hall: Female adoption of Santa Monic'a PEN system. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(1), 49-65.
7. Converse, J. M. (1987). Survey research in the United States: Roots and emergence, 1890-1960. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Dearing, J. D., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. DeFleur, M. L. (1987). The growth and decline of research on the diffusion of news. Communication Research, 14, 109-130.
10. Deutschmann, P. J., & Danielson, W. (1960). Diffusion of the major news story. Journalism Quarterly, 37, 345-355.
11. Graber, D. (2001). Processing politics: Learning from television in the Internet age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Guthrie, K. K., & Dutton, W. H. (1992). The politics of citizen access technology: The development of public information utilities in four cities. Policy Studies Journal, 20, 574-597.
13. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
15. Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the World War. New York: Knopf.
16. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, G. (1944). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
17. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
18. Lippmann, W., & Merz, C. (1920). Test of the news. The New Republic, 33(2), 1-42.
19. Mayer, M. E., Gudykunst, W. B., Perrill, N. K., & Merrill, B. D. (1990). A comparison of competing models of the news diffusion process. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 113-123.
20. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
21. McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. H. (2002). The family in a sequence of political activation: Why civic interventions can succeed. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 4(1), 1-42.
22. McLeod, D. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (2002). Resurveying the boundaries of political communication effects. In J. Byant & D. Zillmann (Eds.). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 215-267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Curtis, A. (1946). Mass persuasion: The social psychology of a War Bond drive. New York: Harper & Brothers.
24. Rogers, E. M. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical approach. New York: Free Press.
25. Rogers, E. M. (2000). Reflections on news event diffusion research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 561-576.
26. Rogers, E. M. (2002a). Intermedia processes and powerful media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 199-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Rogers, E. M. (2002b). The digital divide. Convergence, 7(4), 96-111.
28. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion ofinnovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
29. Rogers, E. M., Collins-Jarvis, L., & Schmitz, J. (1994). The PEN Project in Santa Monica: Interactive communication and political action. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 46(6), 1-10.
30. Rogers, E. M., & Siedel, N. (2002). Diffusion of news of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Prometheus, 20(3), 209-219.
31. Schmitz, J., Rogers, E. M., Phillips, K., & Paschal, D. (1995). The Public Electronic Network (PEN) and the homeless in Santa Monica. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 26-43.
32. Sheingold, C. A. (1973). Social networks and voting: The resurrection of a research agenda. American Sociological Review, 38, 712-720.
33. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. M. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth of knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170.
34. Viswanath, K., & Finnegan, J. R. (1996). The knowledge gap hypothesis: Twenty-five years later. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 187-227). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.