Isotropic high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced 3.0-T MR angiography in patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis

Radiology

Volumn 247, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 228-240

  Kramer, Ulrich ^a   Wiskirchen, Jakub ^a   Fenchel, Michael C ^a   Seeger, Achim ^a   Laub, Gerhard ^b   Tepe, Gunnar ^a   Finn, J Paul ^b   Claussen, Claus D ^a   Miller, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RENAL ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 42449125644     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2471070565     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Tan SP, Bux SI, Kumar G, et al. Evaluation of live renal donors with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to catheter angiography. Transplant Proc 2004;36(7):1914-1916.
2. De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, et al. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2000;214(2):373-380.
3. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ. High-spatial- resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;218(2):481-490.
4. Mallouhi A, Schocke M, Judmaier W, et al. 3D MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 2002;223(2):509-516.
5. Eklöf H, Ahlstrom H, Bostrom A, et al. Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference: a multireader study. Acta Radiol 2005;46(8):802-809.
6. Glockner JF, Vrtiska TJ. Renal MR and CT angiography: current concepts. Abdom Imaging 2007;32(3):407-420.
7. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998;33(9):653-659.
8. Prasad S, Bannister K, Taylor J. Is magnetic resonance angiography useful in renovascular disease? Intern Med J 2003;33(3):84-90.
9. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, et al. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 2005;235(2):687-698.
10. Leung DA, Hagspiel KD, Angle JF, Spinosa DJ, Matsumoto AH, Butty S. MR angiography of the renal arteries. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40(4):847-865.
11. Kramer U, Nael K, Laub G, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries using parallel imaging acquisition techniques at 3.0 T: initial experience. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):125-132.
12. Korst MB, Joosten FB, Postma CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(3):629-634.
13. Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Stemerman DH, Weinreb JC. Single-dose breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the renal arteries. Radiology 1999;211(1):69-78.
14. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003;226(3):798-811.
15. Yerram P, Saab G, Karuparthi PR, Hayden MR, Khanna R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a mysterious disease in patients with renal failure - role of gadolinium-based contrast media in causation and the beneficial effect of intravenous sodium thiosulfate. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2(2):258-263.
16. Kanal E, Broome DR, Martin DR, Thomsen HS. Response to the FDA's May 23, 2007, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis update [editorial]. Radiology 2008;246(1):11-14.
17. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001;135(6):401-411.
18. Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, Lin C, Gibbs GF. Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 tesla: initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12(3):183-204.
19. Fenchel M, Nael K, Deshpande VS, et al. Renal magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 tesla using a 32-element phased-array coil system and parallel imaging in 2 directions. Invest Radiol 2006;41(9):697-703.
20. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al. The feasibility of spatial high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2005;177(6):800-804.
21. Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Breen JF, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology 2000;215(2):584-593.
22. Griswold MA, Blaimer M, Breuer F, Heidemann RM, Mueller M, Jakob PM. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging using the GRAPPA operator formalism. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(6):1553-1556.
23. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47(6):1202-1210.
24. Martin LG, Rundback JH, Sacks D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for angiography, angioplasty, and stent placement in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13(11):1069-1083.
25. Nael K, Saleh R, Lee M, et al. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal arteries with parallel acquisition at 3.0 T: initial experience in 32 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):W77-W85.
26. Willinek WA, Bayer T, Gieseke J, et al. High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2007;17(3):618-625.
27. Nael K, Michaely HJ, Villablanca P, Salamon N, Laub G, Finn JP. Time-resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):116-124.
28. Fenchel M, Nael K, Ruehm S, Finn JP, Miller S, Laub G. Isotropic high spatial resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic arteries using two-dimensional parallel imaging (iPAT2) at 3 tesla: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2006;41(7):545-552.
29. Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C, Gibbs GF, Felmlee JP. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 2001;46(5):955-962.
30. Willoteaux S, Faivre-Pierret M, Moranne O, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the main renal arteries: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2006;241(3):922-929.
31. Tan KT, van Beek EJ, Brown PW, van Delden OM, Tijssen J, Ramsay LE. Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2002;57(7):617-624.
32. Schoenberg SO, Rieger JR, Michaely HJ, Rupprecht H, Samtleben W, Reiser MF. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in renal artery stenosis. Abdom Imaging 2006;31(2):200-212.
33. Leung DA, Pelkonen P, Hany TF, Zimmermann G, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Value of image subtraction in 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(3):598-602.
34. Zhang H, Prince MR. Renal MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004;12(3):487-503.
35. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 2004;141(9):674-682.
36. Patel ST, Mills JL Sr, Tynan-Cuisinier G, Goshima KR, Westerband A, Hughes JD. The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparative analysis with conventional arteriography. J Vasc Surg 2005;41(3):462-468.
37. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16(6):685-696.
38. Kaandorp DW, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kemerink GJ, van Engelshoven JM. Motion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(6):924-928.