Etiquette and the design of educational technology

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 45-49

  Mishra, Punya ^a   Hershey, Kathryn A ^a,b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b College of Education ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTIONS (CAI); EDUCATION CONTEXT; EDUCATIONAL TOOLS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 4243191443     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/975817.975843     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Graham, S., and Barker, G. The downside of help: An attributional- developmental analysis of helping behavior as a low ability cue. J. Educational Psychology 82 (1990) 187-194.
2. Henderlong, J., and Lepper, M.R. The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002), 774-795.
3. Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., and Lester, J.C. Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International J. AI in Education 11 (2000), 47-78.
4. Klingzing, H.G., and Tisher, T.P. Expressive nonverbal behaviors; A review of research on training with consequent recommendations for teacher education. Advances in Teacher Education, Vol. 2. J.D. Raths and L.G. Katz, Eds. Ablex Publishing, 89-133, 1986.
5. Meyer, W.U., Mittag, W., and Engler, U. Some effects of praise and blame on perceived ability and affect. Social Cognition 4, 3 (1986), 293-308.
6. Mishra, P. Affective feedback and its effect on perceived ability and affect: A test of the Computers as Social Actors Hypothesis. Submitted to the 2004 Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Assoc.
7. Mishra, P. and Hershey, K. A framework for designing etiquette for educational technology. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall 2002 Symposium on Etiquette in Human-Computer Work. AAAI Press, Washington, DC.
8. Mishra, P., Nicholson, M., and Wojcikiewicz, S. Does my word processor have a personality? Topffer's law and educational technology. J. Adolescent and Adult Literacy 44, 7 (2001-2003), 634-641.
9. Moreno, R., and Mayer, R.E. Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. J. Educational Psychology 92, 4 (2000), 724-733.
10. Morkes, J., Kernal, H., and Nass, C. Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction 14, 4 (1999), 395-435.
11. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press/CSLI, NY, 1996
12. Woolf, B.P., Beck, J., Eliot, C., and Stern, M. Growth and maturity of intelligent tutoring systems: A status report. Smart Machines in Education: The Coming Revolution in Educational Technology. K.D. Forbus and P.J. Feltorich, Eds. AAAI/MIT Press, Metro Park, CA, 2001.