Breed differences and genetic parameters of myoglobin concentration in porcine longissimus muscle

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 82, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 2264-2268

  Newcom, D W ^a   Stalder, K J ^a,d   Baas, T J ^a   Goodwin, R N ^b,d   Parrish, F C ^a   Wiegand, B R ^c  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL PORK BOARD   (United States)

^c ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d 109 Kildee Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic Parameters; Myoglobin; Pork; Quality

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 4243183658     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/2004.8282264x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allen, E., J. C. Forrest, A. B. Chapman, N. First, R. W. Bray, and E. J. Briskey. 1966. Phenotypic and genetic associations between porcine muscle properties. J. Anim. Sci. 25:962-966.
2. Ball, R. O., J. P. Gibson, C. A. Aker, K. Nadarajah, B. E. Uttaro, and A. Fortin. 1996. Differences among breeds, breed origins, and gender for growth, carcass composition, and pork quality. Pages 12-20 in Ontario Pork Carcass Appraisal Project Symp. C. A. Aker and R. O. Ball, ed. Ontario Swine Improv. Inc. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
3. Berger, P. J., L. L. Christian, C. F. Louis, and J. R. Mickelson. 1994. Estimation of genetic parameters for growth, muscle quality, and nutritional content of meat products for centrally tested purebred market hogs. Pages 51-63 in Research Investment Report 1994. Natl. Pork Prod. Counc., Des Moines, IA.
4. Bligh, E. G., and W. J. Dyer. 1959. A rapid method for total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem Physiol. 3:911-917.
5. Cravens, J. W. 1997. The role of pork quality in export marketing. Pages 17-24 in Pork Quality Summit. Natl. Pork Prod. Counc. Des Moines, IA.
6. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. MacKay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th ed. Longman, New York.
7. Faustman, C., and R. G. Cassens. 1990. The biochemical basis for discoloration in fresh meat: A review. J. Muscle Foods. 1:217-243.
8. Fujii, J., K. Otsu, F. Zorzato, S. De Leon, V. K. Khanna, J. E. Weiler, P. J. O'Brien, and D. H. MacLennan. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253:448-451.
9. nd ed. Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, TX.
10. Goodwin, R. 2000. From hog show to meat case. Natl. Hog Farmer 8:S3-S5.
11. Goodwin, R. N. 1994. Genetic parameters of pork quality traits. Ph.D. Diss. Iowa State Univ., Ames
12. Hamilton, D. N., M. Ellis, K. D. Miller, F. K. McKeith, and D. F. Parrett. 2000. The effect of the Halothane and Rendement Napole genes on carcass and meat quality characteristics of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2862-2867.
13. Hunt, M. C. 1980. Meat color measurements. Proc. Recipr. Meat Conf. 33:41.
14. HunterLab. 1983. The science and Technology of Appearance Measurement. Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA.
15. Kauffman, R. G., G. Eikelenboom, P. G. van der Wal, B. Engel, and M. Zaar. 1986. A comparison of methods to estimate water-holding capacity in post-rigor porcine muscle. Meat Sci. 18:307-322.
16. Lindahl, G., K. Lundström, and E. Tornberg. 2001. Contribution of pigment content, myoglobin forms and internal reflectance to the colour of pork loin and ham from pure breed pigs. Meat Sci. 59:141-151.
17. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA.
18. Miller, K. D., M. Ellis, F. K. McKeith, B. S. Bidner, and D. J. Meisinger. 2000. Frequency of the Rendement Napole RN- allele in a population of American Hampshire pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1811-1815.
19. Miller, R. K., S. J. Moeller, R. N. Goodwin, and G. Davis. 1999. Consistency in meat quality. Natl. Pork Prod. Counc. Quality Lean Growth Modeling Symposium II. Des Moines, IA. November 16-17.
20. Moeller, S. J., T. J. Baas, T. D. Leeds, R. S. Emnett, and K. M. Irvin. 2003. Rendement Napole gene effects and a comparison of glycolytic potential and DNA genotyping for classification of Rendement Napole status in Hampshire-sired pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 81:402-410.
21. Nakai, H. 1991. Meat color evaluation: The evaluation of beef color with standard models. Pages 175-198 in Proc. Electronic Evaluation of Meat in Support of Value-Based Marketing Symp. M. E. D. Judge, ed. Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
22. NPPC. 2000. Pork Composition and Quality Assessment Procedures. E. P. Berg, ed. Natl. Pork Prod. Counc., Des Moines, IA.
23. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
24. Sellier, P. 1998. Genetics of meat and carcass traits. Pages 463-510 in Genetics of the Pig. M. F. Rothschild and A. Ruvinsky, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, U.K.
25. USMEF. 2003. U. S. Meat Export Federation. Available: http://www. usmef.org. Accessed Aug. 10, 2003.
26. Vonada, M. L., B. S. Bidner, K. E. Belk, F. K. McKeith, W. R. Lloyd, M. E. O'Connor, and G. C. Smith. 2000. Quantification of pork belly and Boston butt quality attribute preferences of South Korean customers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2608-2614.