Ki67 predicts progression in early CIN: Validation of a multivariate progression-risk model

Cellular Oncology

Volumn 26, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 13-20

  Kruse, Arnold Jan ^a,b   Baak, Jan P A ^a,b,c   Janssen, Emiel A ^a,b   Kjellevold, Kjell Henning ^a,b   Fiane, Bent ^a,b   Lovslett, Kjell ^a,b   Bergh, Johan ^d   Robboy, Stanley ^e  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Department of Education   (Norway)

^c Madla Gynecology ^*  (Norway)

^d Madla Gynecology   (Netherlands)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervix; CIN; Image analysis; Ki67; Progression

Indexed keywords

KI 67 ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUMOR GROWTH; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERUS BIOPSY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KI-67 ANTIGEN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 4243158349     PISSN: 15705870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. J.P.A. Baak, The framework of pathology: Good Laboratory Practice by quantitative and molecular methods, J. Pathol. 198 (2002), 277-283.
2. J.P.A. Baak, A. Orbo, P.J. van Diest, M. Jiwa, P. de Bruin, M. Broeckaert, W. Snijders, P.J. Boodt, G. Fons, C. Burger, R.H. Verheijen, P.W. Houben, H.S. The and P. Kenemans, Prospective multicenter evaluation of the morphometric D-score for prediction of the outcome of endometrial hyperplasias, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 25 (2001), 930-935.
3. J. Bulten, J.A.W.M. van der Laak, J.H. Gemmink, M.M. Pahlplatz, P.C. de Wilde and A.G. Hanselaar, MIB1, a promising marker for the classification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, J. Pathol. 178 (1996), 268-273.
4. S. Collins, S. Mazloomzadeh, H. Winter, P. Blomfield, A. Bailey, L.S. Young and C.B. Woodman, High incidence of cervical human papillomavirus infection in women during their first sexual relationship, B.J.O.G. 109 (2002), 96-98.
5. M.K. Heatley, How should we grade CIN?, Histopathology 40 (2002), 377-390.
6. B. Hagen and F.E. Skjeldestad, Veileder i gynekologisk onkologi 2002. Den norske laegeforening, Oslo, 2002.
7. A.G. Hanselaar, N. Poulin, M.M. Pahlplatz, D. Garner, C. MacAulay, J. Matisic, J. LeRiche and B. Palcic, DNA-cytometry of progressive and regressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Anal. Cell. Pathol. 16 (1998), 11-27.
8. S.M. Ismail, A.B. Colclough, J.S. Dinnen, D. Eakins, D.M. Evans, E. Gradwell, J.P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Summerell and R. Newcombe, Observer variation in histopathologcial diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, B.M.J. 298 (1989), 707-710.
9. S.M. Ismail, A.B. Colclough, J.S. Dinnen, D. Eakins, D.M. Evans, E. Gradwell, J.P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Summerell and R. Newcombe, Reporting cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN): intra and inter-pathologist variation and factors associated with disagreement, Histopathology 16 (1990), 371-376.
10. S.J. Keenan, J. Diamond, W.G. McCluggage, H. Bharucha, D. Thompson, P.H. Bartels and P.W. Hamilton, An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), J. Pathol. 192 (2000), 351-362.
11. N. Kiviat, Natural history of cervical neoplasia: Overview and update, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 175 (1996), 1099-1104.
12. R. Klaes, A. Benner, T. Friedrich, R. Ridder, S. Herrington, D. Jenkins, R.J. Kurman, D. Schmidt, M. Stoler and M. von Knebel Doeberitz, p16ink4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 26 (2002), 1389-1399.
13. L.A. Koutsky, K.K. Holmes, C.W. Critchlow, C.E. Stevens, J. Paavonen, A.M. Beckmann, T.A. DeRouen, D.A. Galloway, D. Vernon and N.B. Kiviat, A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection, N. Engl. J. Med. 327 (1992), 1272-1278.
14. A.J. Kruse, J.P.A. Baak, P.C. de Bruin, M. Jiwa, W.P. Snijders, P.J. Boodt, G. Fons, P.W. Houben and H.S. Tme, The Ki67 immunoquantitation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a sensitive marker for grading, J. Pathol. 193 (2001), 48-54.
15. A.J. Kruse, J.P.A. Baak, P.C. de Bruin, F.R. van de Goot and N. Kurten, Relationship between the presence of oncogenic HPV DNA assessed by polymerase chain reaction and Ki67 immunoquantitative features in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, J. Pathol. 195 (2001), 557-562.
16. A.J. Kruse, J.P.A. Baak, T. Helliesen, K.H. Kjellevold, M.G. Bol and E.A. Janssen, Evaluation of MIB-1-positive cell clusters as a diagnostic marker for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 26 (2002), 1501-1507.
17. A.J. Kruse, J.P.A. Baak, E.A. Janssen, M.G. Bol, K.H. Kjellevold, B. Fianne, K. Lovslett and J. Bergh, Low and high-risk CIN 1 and 2 lesions: prospective value of grade, HPV and Ki67 immunoquantitative variables, J. Pathol. 199 (2003), 462-470.
18. W.G. McCluggage, H. Bharucha, L.M. Caughley, A. Date, P.W. Hamilton, C.M. Thornton and M.Y. Walsh, Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems, J. Clin. Pathol. 49 (1996), 833-835.
19. A.G. Ostor, The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia- a critical review, Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 12 (1993), 186-192.
20. M.F. Parker, C.M. Zahn, K.M. Vogel, C.H. Olsen, K. Miyazawa and D.M. O'Connor, Discrepancy in the interpretation of cervical histology by gynecologic pathologists, Obstet. Gynecol. 100 (2002), 277-280.
21. E.C. Pirog, R.N. Baergen, R.A. Soslow, D. Tam, A.E. DeMattia, Y.T. Chen and C. Isacson, Diagnostic accuracy of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions is improved with MIB-1 immunostaining, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 26 (2002), 70-75.
22. A.J. Robertson, J.M. Anderson, J.S. Beck, R.A. Burnett, S.R. Howatson, F.D. Lee, A.M. Lessells, K.M. McLaren, S.M. Moss, J.G. Simpson et al., Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens, J. Clin. Pathol. 42 (1989), 231-238.
23. K. Saito, A. Saito, Y.S. Fu, D. Smotkin, J. Gupta and K. Shah, Topographic study of cervical condyloma and intraepithelial neoplasia, Cancer 59 (1987), 2064-2070.
24. M.H. Stoler and M. Schiffman, Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance-Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study, J.A.M.A. 285 (2001), 1500-1505.
25. C.B.J. Woodman, S. Collins, H. Winter, A. Bailey, J. Ellis, P. Prior, M. Yates, T.P. Rollason and L.S. Young, Natural history of cervical human papilloma virus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study, Lancet 357 (2001), 1831-1836.